sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,778
- 6,338
- 126
wherever the hell they feel like?
...factories, farms, etc that would be under Army control. No matter how you cut it, the Navy eventually runs out of Supply.
wherever the hell they feel like?
Air Force.
Why?
They would fly away and let everyone fight to the death, thus being the only survivors and winning the war.
![]()
Ok smart guy, where do they fly to? How long can they stay airborne until they have to refuel?
...factories, farms, etc that would be under Army control. No matter how you cut it, the Navy eventually runs out of Supply.
Good luck using the entire army to secure every port in the entire world.
Good luck using the entire army to secure every port in the entire world.
Wrong, wrong wrong.If that's the case, then the Air Force has the best chance. They have the best Balance of Range, Speed, Firepower, .
Wrong, wrong wrong.
Range -- ever heard of an aircraft carrier? It means infinite range. Fixed position airfield and mid air refueling? Those only work when you have air dominace. And the Navy has just as many planes as the AF.
Speed: No advantage there.
Firepower: Navy has all the same air armaments, with a shit ton more ship bourne armaments, including missile launching subs that could torch every AF base before they even figure out where the Navy is.
Nope. It wouldn't matter where the Navy went, the Air Force can reach it.
The Air Force may be able to reach it.... but they can't do anything when they're dodging 5,000 Rounds per minute being thrown up by CIWS like:
![]()
Or Missiles being fired from these:
![]()
They won't need to. They're not trying to Land, just get within Range of their Ordnance.
you do realize that Phalanx CIWS was initially designed to shoot down missiles right?
If it was easy to attack an Aircraft carrier.. don't you think other countries would have already tried?
It isn't the Air Force that made Iraq and Afghanistan airspace owned by the US Military... it was the US Navy.
I don't see a Country Attacking Ford Broncos. Is it because they are impervious to Attack?
The Army is by far the most self sufficient. In a war of attrition, the army would win. You don't just kill a million people in 1 night.
Also people underestimate the power of SAMs. Modern patriot missiles are able to shoot down incoming missiles, not just aircraft.You can go ahead and launch tomahawks all day, but you're going to lose an awful lot of them to intercepts.
The army will always win the logistical war. The Marines aren't self sufficient, they don't even have a medical corps and the navy/airforce have very little ability to take and occupy territory. You can always deny an area through indirect fire, but it will always require boots on the ground direct engagement to actually take it. This won't be a quick war against the army so it all comes down to the capabilities of each unit's BSBs and MEDCOM.
I give a fully mobilized marine force a couple months without air force/navy support to run out of fuel and food.
except F-22s and F-15s would rape the shit out of the Navy's planes. Subs would make it interesting, but still, the Air Force would destroy all the surface ships with ease and in short order.
Agree, logistics wins large wars. If the war isn't over in first 3 months, the others will start coming apart..
That's what I figure too. The AF must have weapons that can take out ships from outside fighter range. Surface ships are large slow targets.