War is won by tactic, strategies, and brains, not by force. California has a higher education score than Texas. California wins.
LMFAO! California schools are a joke! I used to live in Riverside. And who gives a flying fuck what the landscapes look like both have oceans and desert.
LOL, Riverside. That's the armpit of SoCal.LMFAO! California schools are a joke! I used to live in Riverside. And who gives a flying fuck what the landscapes look like both have oceans and desert.
Asking who has a bigger military presence isn't much better. California is basically home to the defense industry but Texas probably has more people who own a guy.What the fuck does armed citizens have to do with anything?
We employ armies to win wars.
Maybe someone needs to define the fight.
So with this in mind, whoever has the bigger military presence will win a war.
California is basically home to the defense industry but Texas probably has more people who own a guy.
CA to Mexico: You can have Texas back. Sit back and watch. End of war.
Mexico can't even win a war in there own country.
Asking who has a bigger military presence isn't much better. California is basically home to the defense industry but Texas probably has more people who own a guy.
Mexico can't even win a war in there own country.
No one in Texas has yet realized we have schneiderguy. CA will win for sure.
I'm always amazed that everyone discounts submarines when it comes to the military argument. Subs counted for more kills on the Japanese military than any other weapon we had and that was just the diesel electrics of back then. Now they are the most powerful weapons on earth, have been for decades and Loma is home to a bunch of them (submarine squadron 11)good luck to california with no oil.
as for doing it with federales:
california has no strategic bombers and no active army divisions. so, no, not really.