If liberals care more for the little guy, why do conservatives give more to charity?

[imported_Crusader]

edit to add- same answer applies to this old socialist as well-

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No you're a mouthy punk emboldened by the anonymity of the Internet. What you are advocating is the exact same thing that the Muslim Extremists/Terrorists are advocating except with different victims. The difference is at least they are willing to put their lives on the line however fscked up it is. Both of you are cowards its just that your level of cowardice is higher as you'd have someone else do your dirty work for you

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
LOL, yeah, but your not willing to actually go to Iraq. I have to admire your "commitment" to finish what you started. :laugh: If you really felt so stongly about the US being nuked and that we could prevent it then you should quit what3ver it is your doing and join up ASAP, otherwise it's all just big talk and everyone knows that talk is cheap.

This is basically all you said over and over in your reply ezduzit.. so its all I'm going ot bother replying to.

Its a typical move to attempt to discredit anyone who supports the War on Terror, yet isnt there right now.
If you arent there, you MUST be a hypocrite.

Thats whats unique about liberals like yourself. Let me explain: you have no firm principles or moral standing, nor any sense of what you are.. or self-pride. Everyone else claims to be things like pro-American (=for the War on Terror), or a Christian (or another religous sect). Those people are NOTHING but hypocrites and frauds because they have standards, dreams, visions, goals.. and fail to live up to them sometimes.

Its FAR easier to sit behind your keyboard and cry out 'chickenhawk neocon' all day long.. which I"m sure you do well bitching to your family and friends constantly like the pitiful man you appear to be.
You cannot POSSIBLY be a hypocrite because you stand for nothing.
Thats nice.


And by the way, if you were some sort of great man who was def NOT a hypocrite (like myself apparantly).. where were you deployed to in Afghanistan yourself?

Oh wait.. you're full of s*** following typical left wing lines. Chickenhawk/neocon was already expected to come from you.. esp considering once I owned you on the actual issues you turned the debate into a chickenhawk/neocon battle.
Thats nice, and might convince some people who like the easy-way-out of an ideological debate (such as you).. but I'm not impressed.



People against the War on Terror are angry about the USA promoting democracy/capitalism. Thats what its all about at the root. The rest of you are just useful idiots furthering their cause.
Since the Soviets are no longer pushing communism, theres no counter force to the USA. And our mideast actions continue our push to spread our way of life.
Thats EXTREMELY alarming to the people who were pro-Soviet prior to Reagan defeating them.

The people behind the anti-war movement would sacrifice your life in an INSTANT to spread socialism and communism. You are just a blind fool.
Its not about war or lives, or even oil. The left is concerned with the spreading of American influence, period. Failing in Iraq weakens the USA.
And a socialists enemy #1 is the US government.

So congrats, you are a traitor and you probably had no clue. Which is how the Left likes you.

 

[1EZduzit]

Originally posted by: Crusader
edit to add- same answer applies to this old socialist as well-

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No you're a mouthy punk emboldened by the anonymity of the Internet. What you are advocating is the exact same thing that the Muslim Extremists/Terrorists are advocating except with different victims. The difference is at least they are willing to put their lives on the line however fscked up it is. Both of you are cowards its just that your level of cowardice is higher as you'd have someone else do your dirty work for you

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
LOL, yeah, but your not willing to actually go to Iraq. I have to admire your "commitment" to finish what you started. :laugh: If you really felt so stongly about the US being nuked and that we could prevent it then you should quit what3ver it is your doing and join up ASAP, otherwise it's all just big talk and everyone knows that talk is cheap.

This is basically all you said over and over in your reply ezduzit.. so its all I'm going ot bother replying to.

Its a typical move to attempt to discredit anyone who supports the War on Terror, yet isnt there right now.
If you arent there, you MUST be a hypocrite.

By your own admission you aren't willing to go fight unless drafted, so yes, you are a hypocite, and the worst kind, a flag waving hypocrite.

Thats whats unique about liberals like yourself. Let me explain: you have no firm principles or moral standing, nor any sense of what you are.. or self-pride. Everyone else claims to be things like pro-American (=for the War on Terror), or a Christian (or another religous sect). Those people are NOTHING but hypocrites and frauds because they have standards, dreams, visions, goals.. and fail to live up to them sometimes.

And you can tell all that because I'm against the war in Iraq? Gee, I should just give up arguing with you right now if your that all-knowing.

I know what I am, a concerned American trying to get to the truth and hopefully save some american soilders from needlessly givng up life and/or limb. You on the other hand are willing to use lies and fear mongering to try and sway other people's opinions. You just can't get it through your thick skull that war is the last option, not the first. That's the main problem I have with chickenhawks such as yourself. You are willing to sacrafice so many others to do what you think is right, but you just aren't ready to make any real sacrafices yourself or compromise your own safety to do what you think is right. Now that is the defintion of hypocrite in my book.

If you could show me a good reason why this war is worth pursuing then I would be willing to change my view, but all you have is that we are going to get nuked by terrorists someday. That may be true, but if your and your ilk aren't concerned enough about that possibility to join up and fight (until forced to by the draft), then I have to beleive that either you are not the true patriot you try and make yourself out to be or in your heart of hearts you don't really believe we are in great enough dange for you to risk your life. Funny though how you think anybody who sees things differntly is a tool of the left and are bent on destroying America.

Its FAR easier to sit behind your keyboard and cry out 'chickenhawk neocon' all day long.. which I"m sure you do well bitching to your family and friends constantly like the pitiful man you appear to be.
You cannot POSSIBLY be a hypocrite because you stand for nothing.
Thats nice.

You don't knowthe first thing about me and yet you can sit there and procalim with 100% confidence that I stand for nothing?? You are such a fraud, you are pathetic, truly.

And by the way, if you were some sort of great man who was def NOT a hypocrite (like myself apparantly).. where were you deployed to in Afghanistan yourself?

How do you know I wasn't? Did you ask me or do you just like jumping to conclusions that fit your argument. :laugh:

Oh wait.. you're full of s*** following typical left wing lines. Chickenhawk/neocon was already expected to come from you.. esp considering once I owned you on the actual issues you turned the debate into a chickenhawk/neocon battle.
Thats nice, and might convince some people who like the easy-way-out of an ideological debate (such as you).. but I'm not impressed.

You owned me?? Yeah, just like your side owned the last elections.

I call them the way I see them, if you don't like it, too bad, so sad. What's the matter, are you getting tired of being called a chickenhawk? Sometimes the truth hurts.

People against the War on Terror are angry about the USA promoting democracy/capitalism. Thats what its all about at the root. The rest of you are just useful idiots furthering their cause.
Since the Soviets are no longer pushing communism, theres no counter force to the USA. And our mideast actions continue our push to spread our way of life.
Thats EXTREMELY alarming to the people who were pro-Soviet prior to Reagan defeating them.

The people behind the anti-war movement would sacrifice your life in an INSTANT to spread socialism and communism. You are just a blind fool.
Its not about war or lives, or even oil. The left is concerned with the spreading of American influence, period. Failing in Iraq weakens the USA.
And a socialists enemy #1 is the US government.

So congrats, you are a traitor and you probably had no clue. Which is how the Left likes you.

It's not my/our responsibility to establish a democracy/capitalism in Iraq and if GWB had said he that's why he wanted to invade Iraq, he never would been given enough wiggle room to do so. Your not going to change my view and you don't seem to have the intellectual capability to understand mine so I'm going to stop wasting my time with you. I do think you should contimue on winning friends and influencing people by calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor. It's worked so far, right!!

We shall see what happens at the next election. I'd wish you good luck, but that would be hypocitical on my part.

 

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by: Crusader
edit to add- same answer applies to this old socialist as well-

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No you're a mouthy punk emboldened by the anonymity of the Internet. What you are advocating is the exact same thing that the Muslim Extremists/Terrorists are advocating except with different victims. The difference is at least they are willing to put their lives on the line however fscked up it is. Both of you are cowards its just that your level of cowardice is higher as you'd have someone else do your dirty work for you

Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
LOL, yeah, but your not willing to actually go to Iraq. I have to admire your "commitment" to finish what you started. :laugh: If you really felt so stongly about the US being nuked and that we could prevent it then you should quit what3ver it is your doing and join up ASAP, otherwise it's all just big talk and everyone knows that talk is cheap.

This is basically all you said over and over in your reply ezduzit.. so its all I'm going ot bother replying to.

Its a typical move to attempt to discredit anyone who supports the War on Terror, yet isnt there right now.
If you arent there, you MUST be a hypocrite.

Thats whats unique about liberals like yourself. Let me explain: you have no firm principles or moral standing, nor any sense of what you are.. or self-pride. Everyone else claims to be things like pro-American (=for the War on Terror), or a Christian (or another religous sect). Those people are NOTHING but hypocrites and frauds because they have standards, dreams, visions, goals.. and fail to live up to them sometimes.

Its FAR easier to sit behind your keyboard and cry out 'chickenhawk neocon' all day long.. which I"m sure you do well bitching to your family and friends constantly like the pitiful man you appear to be.
You cannot POSSIBLY be a hypocrite because you stand for nothing.
Thats nice.


And by the way, if you were some sort of great man who was def NOT a hypocrite (like myself apparantly).. where were you deployed to in Afghanistan yourself?

Oh wait.. you're full of s*** following typical left wing lines. Chickenhawk/neocon was already expected to come from you.. esp considering once I owned you on the actual issues you turned the debate into a chickenhawk/neocon battle.
Thats nice, and might convince some people who like the easy-way-out of an ideological debate (such as you).. but I'm not impressed.



People against the War on Terror are angry about the USA promoting democracy/capitalism. Thats what its all about at the root. The rest of you are just useful idiots furthering their cause.
Since the Soviets are no longer pushing communism, theres no counter force to the USA. And our mideast actions continue our push to spread our way of life.
Thats EXTREMELY alarming to the people who were pro-Soviet prior to Reagan defeating them.

The people behind the anti-war movement would sacrifice your life in an INSTANT to spread socialism and communism. You are just a blind fool.
Its not about war or lives, or even oil. The left is concerned with the spreading of American influence, period. Failing in Iraq weakens the USA.
And a socialists enemy #1 is the US government.

So congrats, you are a traitor and you probably had no clue. Which is how the Left likes you.

So you're bitching about 1EZduzit stereotyping and generalizing "everyone else" (ie, conservatives who think exactly like you do) while generalizing and stereotyping all liberals as some sort of "anti-war on terror" communists who hate America? That's some Zen sh!t right there...

 

[CitizenKain]

Originally posted by: Crusader

Thats whats unique about liberals like yourself. Let me explain: you have no firm principles or moral standing, nor any sense of what you are.. or self-pride

HAHAHAHAHA, thats funny from someone who considers genocide and murder to upstanding character traits.
Reagen defeated the Soviets? That funny, Reagan didn't do anything but massively drive up spending, while selling weapons to terrorists. Fine upstanding person he was. No wonder you worship him.