Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dnuggett
The question is moot. Ask in another four years after he steps down from being President.
I thought i mentioned in the OP that this is hypothetical, and that it wasnt a debate on results.
Disregarding the thought doesnt help your case for re-electing someone without sellable qualities.
That's all we are looking for, qualities Bush could sell after this term expires.
Why do you care? Has he asked to crash on your couch? This isn't a particularly clever Bush-bashing thread, and it deserves no serious responses.
Edit: Oh, and Stunt, shouldn't your title be "If Bush Loses (not Looses) the election . . ."? I went to public school so I'm no grammar and spelling ace, but it seems to me that if you're going to call someone stupid, you ought to at least offer some evidence you're a little smarter. Otherwise, it's "Pot, meet kettle!"
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
You Bush-Haters just can't get over it can you?a) Bush can't lecture and isn't smart enough to actually give intellectual insight.
This is the most hateful, childish thread i've seen today, but the day is young...
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
You Bush-Haters just can't get over it can you?a) Bush can't lecture and isn't smart enough to actually give intellectual insight.
This is the most hateful, childish thread i've seen today, but the day is young...
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dnuggett
The question is moot. Ask in another four years after he steps down from being President.
I thought i mentioned in the OP that this is hypothetical, and that it wasnt a debate on results.
Disregarding the thought doesnt help your case for re-electing someone without sellable qualities.
That's all we are looking for, qualities Bush could sell after this term expires.
Why do you care? Has he asked to crash on your couch? This isn't a particularly clever Bush-bashing thread, and it deserves no serious responses.
Edit: Oh, and Stunt, shouldn't your title be "If Bush Loses (not Looses) the election . . ."? I went to public school so I'm no grammar and spelling ace, but it seems to me that if you're going to call someone stupid, you ought to at least offer some evidence you're a little smarter. Otherwise, it's "Pot, meet kettle!"
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: dnuggett
The question is moot. Ask in another four years after he steps down from being President.
I thought i mentioned in the OP that this is hypothetical, and that it wasnt a debate on results.
Disregarding the thought doesnt help your case for re-electing someone without sellable qualities.
That's all we are looking for, qualities Bush could sell after this term expires.
Why do you care? Has he asked to crash on your couch? This isn't a particularly clever Bush-bashing thread, and it deserves no serious responses.
Edit: Oh, and Stunt, shouldn't your title be "If Bush Loses (not Looses) the election . . ."? I went to public school so I'm no grammar and spelling ace, but it seems to me that if you're going to call someone stupid, you ought to at least offer some evidence you're a little smarter. Otherwise, it's "Pot, meet kettle!"
Lol, right on with your response. When you say things like "the momentum has switched to Kerry" and "even hardcore Republican supporters"....... then go on to bash him, what do you expect, Stunt? Hiding behind the self imposed "I wanna make a hypothetical" comment isn't going to stop me from calling you out on an ignorant statement. Your hypothetical sucks, let me give you some realism.....
BUSH & CHENEY YOUR NEXT PRESIDENT/ VICE PRESIDENT.
Quit crying about how this thread didn't turn out they way you want it. Try stepping back and looking at your OP... maybe that'll help you figure it out.
Also, even though i stated my personal views, you might have noticed this: "Rebuttles?", implying i proposed myself that the three points mentioned can be scrutinized.
Originally posted by: dnuggett
Also, even though i stated my personal views, you might have noticed this: "Rebuttles?", implying i proposed myself that the three points mentioned can be scrutinized.
Your rebuttle is.... (get this) the hypothetical dream you have of Bush losing is moot. Your topic title asks what happens when Bush loses. It's not gonna happen. You state you are entitled to your opinion and I should stop complaining. Ditto.
Who is complaining? Certainly not me. I'm just trying to help you with the obvious.
