• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

i7 4770k new 3dmark physics test

C

csbin

Senior member
EJ72QSs.png


:whiste::whiste:
 
Physics score is relevant here since it measures x86 performance, but GPU score is interesting.
For GPU comparison here is 5800K:
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/139753
Here is 5800K with 7700 series hybrid CF:
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/113537

For x86 compression here is 4.4Ghz 3770K's result in physics:
http://www.3dmark.com/cg/57720
At 3.5ghz(a clock it would most likely run at in this benchmark) the 3770K would score ~6710pts. 4770K @ stock scores 7053pts. Both are 3.5/3.9Ghz parts(supposedly true for 4770K).
Maybe IDC can run new 3dmark on his machine if he finds time so we can know what it gets in Physics subtest @ stock.
 
"
At 3.5ghz(a clock it would most likely run at in this benchmark) the 3770K would score ~6710pts. 4770K @ stock scores 7053pts. Both are 3.5/3.9Ghz parts(supposedly true for 4770K).
"

- That is a little .. little :/
 
cytg111 said:
"
At 3.5ghz(a clock it would most likely run at in this benchmark) the 3770K would score ~6710pts. 4770K @ stock scores 7053pts. Both are 3.5/3.9Ghz parts(supposedly true for 4770K).
"

- That is a little .. little :/
Click to expand...
Yes but we need a real 3770K@ stock score 😉. Then we can compare them as it should be done.
 
cytg111 said:
"
At 3.5ghz(a clock it would most likely run at in this benchmark) the 3770K would score ~6710pts. 4770K @ stock scores 7053pts. Both are 3.5/3.9Ghz parts(supposedly true for 4770K).
"

- That is a little .. little :/
Click to expand...


1% better than a similar clocked 3770k...

That's probably well within the margin of error for these benchmarks too.
 
2-3% IPC increase?

Ouch.


That's even worse then the previous "leak".



Hope this doesn't turn into bulldozer part deux for intel :C

I want to upgrade with my tax dollars!
 
Guys on Q3 2013 Asus will unveil its Ivy Bridge E processors.

6core and 8core desktops and 10 and 12 core xeons E

I just upgrade BIOS and slap on a 8 core. cant wait 🙂 16 threads wow.
 
csbin said:
EJ72QSs.png


:whiste::whiste:
Click to expand...

Here's my 3770k locked at 3.5GHz:

Physics Score 6840

And here's my 3770k at 3.7GHz, which is what a stock x770k chip should run at under full load:

Physics Score 7204

I'd say there's not much improvement, if any, in that 4770k score. Assuming it's locked at 3.5GHz, it's a 3% IPC improvement.
 
Last edited:
WTF is a 4770k BTW Ivy Bridge E processor 2013 Q3. These processors will blow away anything Haswell has for 2013 at least.

Im gonna grab a 8 core, 16 threads , wow,,,,,,, How many core is that 4770k hmmm.
 
Termie said:
Here's my 3770k locked at 3.5GHz:

Physics Score 6840

And here's my 3770k at 3.7GHz, which is what a stock x770k chip should run at under full load:

Physics Score 7204

I'd say there's not much improvement, if any, in that 4770k score. Assuming it's locked at 3.5GHz, it's a 3% IPC improvement.
Click to expand...
Thanks for running the test on your system.
In this particular test there seems to be very small improvement from IB to Haswell. It's rather strange since Phycis is well MTed and additional load port and exec. unit should be able to at least provide some benefit. IB is well rounded core it seems , intel is nearing the edge of extractable IPC in legacy code. If this Physics subtest was running some specially coded AVX or FMA(if applicable) code then Haswell would probably storm ahead by some healthy margin. This is what makes it more "future proof" core.

For regular Joe users ,difference between IB and Haswell will probably be unnoticeable except when more powerful integrated GPU is used of course.
 
Termie said:
Here's my 3770k locked at 3.5GHz:

Physics Score 6840

And here's my 3770k at 3.7GHz, which is what a stock x770k chip should run at under full load:

Physics Score 7204

I'd say there's not much improvement, if any, in that 4770k score. Assuming it's locked at 3.5GHz, it's a 3% IPC improvement.
Click to expand...


Did you run with iGPU? If not, your score is not comparable. GPU has a small effect on physics scores.
 
Termie said:
Here's my 3770k locked at 3.5GHz:

Physics Score 6840

And here's my 3770k at 3.7GHz, which is what a stock x770k chip should run at under full load:

Physics Score 7204

I'd say there's not much improvement, if any, in that 4770k score. Assuming it's locked at 3.5GHz, it's a 3% IPC improvement.
Click to expand...

I can't even see a source for that graphic by the op. Am I missing something?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top