i7-3770K @ 4.8ghz - vcore

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SHAQ

Senior member
Aug 5, 2002
738
0
76
If your LLC is max you are probably underestimating the voltage. Some boards overvolt on the highest setting. Mine seems to overvolt about .03v-.035v.

I actually wanted to try to get 5 Ghz stable, but it won't even post above 4.82 so I'm trying to figure out what the "magic" setting is to get it to post. I turned off the deep C states and that seemed to help to get 4.75 stable again. I may try turning off C1e as well.
 

SHAQ

Senior member
Aug 5, 2002
738
0
76
I set CPU PLL down to 1.466v(as low as my Asrock will go) and I am now running P95 at 4.7 at the same voltage I was using at 4.625. I wasn't able to get 4.7 stable at this voltage before at 1.811v(default). I'm going to see how far I can go now. It looks like it is set way too high at default.
 

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
I'll join the ultra high voltage club more after I get my new IHS TIM and IX.

I have managed to get it 4.7Ghz stable, but that's already nearing 1.4V
 

n0x1ous

Platinum Member
Sep 9, 2010
2,574
252
126
Ok at 4.5ghz, my 3770K just beat the score for 4.7ghz (cinebench)... And no.. the 4.7ghz score was not under any throttling.. Strange huh?

but yeah.. past 4.4ghz and the voltage required increases exponentially.. I undervolted for 4.3ghz..

Not strange at all. SB (and IB now) will be "stable" but perform slower due to internal error handling. Your 4.7Ghz wasn't really stable. See Idontcare's old post regarding linpack and the GFLOPS rating at different speeds/voltages for reference.


IDC could we get some clarification on this?
 

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
Games I can assure you won't make much difference. At least not at those speeds. These procs are already mostly idle in those.
 

n0x1ous

Platinum Member
Sep 9, 2010
2,574
252
126
so your saying the benefit of the overclock is still there, but when the processor is 100% loaded its leaving some improvement on the table by not having the correct voltage?
 

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
I'm not saying that really because I don't really know. What I am saying is that games don't benefit from faster than stock because most all games are waiting on the GPU and not the CPU.
 

n0x1ous

Platinum Member
Sep 9, 2010
2,574
252
126
to a degree yes, but i just moved from a Q6600 to a 3770k and it made a HUGE difference in my 480 SLI setup that was being bottlenecked.

But I know what you mean in that most games are GPU limited.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
This. Anyway 1.4 is highly likely to get you there. But going over 4.5 isnt worth it IMO

It totally is worth it.

my sandy 2500k at 4.8 feels way faster than it is at 3.3 .:sneaky:

even if the effect is placebo, if it' feeeels real, what's the problem really, :cool:
 

LagunaX

Senior member
Jan 7, 2010
716
0
76
The newer 2013 Costa Rica batches seem incredible, might be time to sell my trusty low voltage 4.8ghz 2500k and 2600k :)
3770k48ghz3231B415_zpsdc9d043f.jpg
 
Last edited:

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
@lagunx where did you get the CR chip from? I've finally got my 3770K stable at 4.8 but requires 1.41 volts... on water. :(
 

LagunaX

Senior member
Jan 7, 2010
716
0
76
My 3700k survived the delidding surgery despite my scoring of the PCB with my X-Acto knife and exposing some yellow metal.
Die Liquid Pro, IHS MX-4, resealed with Alumina thermal bonding compound.

Highest difference 21c drop, lowest difference 15c drop, after 1 hour of Prime95.

Before:
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg84/jhchang69/3770k48ghz3231B415_zpsdc9d043f.jpg
3770k48ghz3231B415_zpsdc9d043f.jpg


After:
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg84/jhchang69/Delidded3770k_zps393f2f66.jpg
Delidded3770k_zps393f2f66.jpg


http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg84/jhchang69/IBTDelidded3770k_zps547b885a.jpg
IBTDelidded3770k_zps547b885a.jpg
 
Last edited: