I need a CPU for a system with a Z490 motherboard and 3600MHz RAM. Assuming I wouldn't overclock and kept the CPU at stock, how do these two compare?
I read that the 10600K is made out of a 10 core die with 4 cores disabled, whereas the 10600 is made from a 6 core die (like the 8700K). Does this give the non-K an advantage in terms of core-to-core latency?
And how much does the higher base clock of the 10600K matter?
I read that the 10600K is made out of a 10 core die with 4 cores disabled, whereas the 10600 is made from a 6 core die (like the 8700K). Does this give the non-K an advantage in terms of core-to-core latency?
And how much does the higher base clock of the 10600K matter?