... and after two hours and forty-five minutes of graphic, digitally enhanced violence punctuated by gouts of hydraulically propelled gore, I realized that I was just happy there wasn't any sex.
Don't see any issues. Most 16 year olds can handle it.
... and after two hours and forty-five minutes of graphic, digitally enhanced violence punctuated by gouts of hydraulically propelled gore, I realized that I was just happy there wasn't any sex.
By age 16 she's probably the least of a fathers worries.
... I realized that I was just happy there wasn't any sex.
... and after two hours and forty-five minutes of graphic, digitally enhanced violence punctuated by gouts of hydraulically propelled gore, I realized that I was just happy there wasn't any sex.
Wait. Were you happy there wasn't any sex because
1) You have a 16yo daughter watching
2) You were just happy not to see sex
![]()
Your daughter knows what sex is by age 16. What, you think she's going to go out and get pregnant just because she saw two people on the screen in a love scene?
Parents are funny.
don't make him read that jeesh
... and after two hours and forty-five minutes of graphic, digitally enhanced violence punctuated by gouts of hydraulically propelled gore, I realized that I was just happy there wasn't any sex.
Which sort of activity would you rather have her involved in?
Fulfilling her biological needs, as you have clearly done
or
Violence punctuated by gouts of hydraulically propelled gore?
I still think it's backwards that, in America, violence in the media is A-OK, but sex is a big no no.
It wasn't that good. Totally over-hyped.I've heard good things about this movie but if it is 2.75 hours, I guarantee I will never watch it.
I still think it's backwards that, in America, violence in the media is A-OK, but sex is a big no no.