AtenRa
Lifer
- Feb 2, 2009
- 14,001
- 3,357
- 136
Except that this thread is not about SFF.
Where does it says its only about Full Towers ??
The thread is about iGPUs but you had no problem talking about CPU + dGPUs.
double standards ??
Except that this thread is not about SFF.
For idle power consumption, I do wonder how the APUs compare to CPU + dGPU?
Lets say Athlon x 4 860K + R7 250 vs. A10-7850K......idle power consumption difference?
Where does it says its only about Full Towers ??
The thread is about iGPUs but you had no problem talking about CPU + dGPUs.
double standards ??
If i remember correctly i believe the A10-7850K has lower.
This thread is about performance in games, not about case size.
Because this thread is about the (only) selling point of APUs: gaming at a low budget.
I asked you to show games that do not run on a dual core CPU (because it is only a dual core), but are playable on a [more than dual core] CPU with only the integrated graphics.
You posted a GTA 5 benchmark with various CPUs, all paired with a GTX 970. "Jeez..", indeed.
Yes, I figured the APU would have lower idle power consumption....I just wonder how much lower?
Is the cost saving difference enough that maybe the APU is worth going to for a 24/7 server that can also play games, use Open CL apps?
Or maybe the lack of dGPU helps the user puts more hard drives in the enclosure.
There are pictures if you can't read it.Die Anzahl der physischen Kerne ist dagegen offensichtlich zweitrangig, so lange es vier logische sind.
Also, I enjoyed BattleFront beta immensely, as well as console peasants did.
How well did it run on pentium + gtx750?
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-10/star-wars-battlefront-erste-benchmarks-der-open-beta/
There are pictures if you can't read it.
Even console peasants could try it for free.
900p on apu:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0ckfy4n6z8
And for a good reason!In your first link I see a GTX 750 Ti that performs at 35fps in a 40 player multiplayer game, at 1920x1080 with unknown game settings (since they test cards like R9 Fury X and GTX 980 Ti, it could be at maximum settings). Probably they've done the tests with that i7-4770k. Not seen a Pentium mentioned there.
Die Anzahl der physischen Kerne ist dagegen offensichtlich zweitrangig, so lange es vier logische sind.
Battlefront on a G3258 with GTX960.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE5LW18k_r0
Looks fine to me on a dualcore.
Except that this thread is not about SFF.
i3-6100's MSRP is $117, and you can, in fact, get them around MSRP from 3rd party Amazon sellers.
So you need AMD's top of the line APU for $140 to get less performance than you would from a dual-core Pentium Haswell and a GTX 750 as Seba pointed out.
Where's the draw? Even if you're building a SFF system, you can get ITX versions of a lot of NVIDIA cards.
1. CPU throttling on the Kaveri APU during iGPU load. (Athlon x4 860K doesn't have this problem)
2. Price of dual channel 2 x 4GB DDR3 2133/DDR4 2400 RAM vs. dual channel kit 2 x 4GB 1600 kit (or maybe even one 8GB DDR3 1600 stick)
3. Resolution being tested. In the low resolution case shown below a Athlon x4 860K plus R7 240 DDR3 beats a A10-7850K with dual channel DDR4 2400:
Hahahahah such a great experience..28 fps is gorgeus...apu won big time.Also, I enjoyed BattleFront beta immensely, as well as console peasants did.
How well did it run on pentium + gtx750?
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-10/star-wars-battlefront-erste-benchmarks-der-open-beta/
There are pictures if you can't read it.
Even console peasants could try it for free.
900p on apu:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0ckfy4n6z8
Hahahahah such a great experience..28 fps is gorgeus...apu won big time.
I would rather not play the game at all instead of playing at 28fps which gives you an headcache after 5 minutes.
what happened to games like LoL where you can run settings on MAX (as in the ad campaign) without difficulty? The campaign pertains to products like that, not AAA titles.
LoL is nothing special in graphics, there are many many more games that you can almost max out or play at way higher IQ/Resolutions with AMD APUs but not with Intel.
And many of them are free to play.
edit:
The funny thing is that AMD would only need to put HBM on Kaveri and without even changing the architecture or increase Steam Processors it would gain 30-50% higher performance.
Next year Carrizo with DDR-4 and Color compression will be enough for 1080p 30+fps at sub $150.00
I could play the game with the sub $100 A8-7600 at nice 40fps and above. No need to play at 28fps.
With vsync you will be playing at 30fps. That's unbearable.
nobody plays online fps with vsync