soulcougher73
Lifer
- Nov 29, 2006
- 15,908
- 4,486
- 136
Yeah the SJW movement has gone full retard. Its a joke now.
2 problems with this thread.
A few people represent the "left" on a position not commonly represented.
How do we know you didn't just make this shit up? Its a common practice on the right. Keep repeating a lie until enough people believe. Recording, or it didn't happen
really, do tell me more about how drumpf is so truthful and honest, and how fox news never lies or misleads their audience, or how glen beck is the bastion of integrity, or limbaugh the paragon of virtue and respect, or bill o'reilly a champion of the truthThe parrot clone army of the left is built on repeating lies and changing reality to fit their lies.
What would you do with your feelings of superiority if you grew up in a world where the productive social value was that everyone was equal?
Personally I'm glad when I grew up it was still (somewhat) celebrated when someone kicked someone else's ass.
The parrot clone army of the left is built on repeating lies and changing reality to fit their lies.
More lies from a FUCKING POSEUR...The people on the left run in herds and packs. They are prone to hysteria and violence so beware. Also they are irrational and hateful to people who think differently in any way, including other leftists.
They even have a fringe army of violent psychopaths called "Antifa", followed closely by "BLM" who tend to get their panties in a bunch and burn things if you disagree with them.
The people on the left run in herds and packs. They are prone to hysteria and violence so beware. Also they are irrational and hateful to people who think differently in any way, including other leftists.
They even have a fringe army of violent psychopaths called "Antifa", followed closely by "BLM" who tend to get their panties in a bunch and burn things if you disagree with them.
They easiest way to tell if you are looking at a leftist is they are using an Obamaphone while sipping on a Starebucks latte
More lies from a FUCKING POSEUR...
There's a huge difference between celebrating a person's achievements and celebrating what they were awarded at birth.
Also, is it more worth celebrating when one person kicks another's ass or when they collaborate and make something better than either individual could?
SJWs?? Southern Jewish Women?I was just told by a group of SJWs, all in agreement, that finding intelligence attractive is "ableist and classist bigotry."
If this is the logic I was supporting I regret my vote for sanders (but clearly not my vote for Hilary).
Btw, if you do think intelligence is "classist" (not IQ, the tests are classist) then you are bigoted against the poor - I was poor for the first 33 years of my 36 years of life and knew many folks that were intellectually engaged but subject to bad circumstances.
^^ This, this right here, well right up there, is how it is done.Your use of "has" in the title has me triggered about your Cultural Appropriation!
Warning: meandering wall of text (hopefully it's interesting, it's certainly got something for most people. It's got WWI era intelligence testing for semi-illiterate soldiers, 60's youth movements and denazification)
tl;dr: Measurements of intelligence are often caught up in socioeconomic bias, and these people are conflating that with intelligence itself. They are either making assumptions about who they're speaking to or just can't represent the difference between something being fraught with bias and something being intrinsically biased. It's wrong but it's not necessarily a ton more off base than most other things but people are super touchy when accusations of bias or prejudice are thrown around.
Bingo. I hadn't heard the example from Italy, but the one presented to me was South American emigres being shown an umbrella and asked "Do you use this when the sun is out or when it's raining?"
Now here in the US the answer is "when it's raining." But in the tropics, when it rains, it's an unholy hellstorm downpour. You stay inside. And when the sun's out, it burns like an oven, so you use an umbrella (para sol = "for the sun") so you don't get turned into 130lb of carne asada.
Entirely cultural, and had the situation been reversed, the American would be branded with a low IQ for even considering going out in a storm.
Warning: meandering wall of text (hopefully it's interesting, it's certainly got something for most people. It's got WWI era intelligence testing for semi-illiterate soldiers, 60's youth movements and denazification)
tl;dr: Measurements of intelligence are often caught up in socioeconomic bias, and these people are conflating that with intelligence itself. They are either making assumptions about who they're speaking to or just can't represent the difference between something being fraught with bias and something being intrinsically biased. It's wrong but it's not necessarily a ton more off base than most other things but people are super touchy when accusations of bias or prejudice are thrown around.
He's not a moron; he's just a disgusting human being.yep. every time jeff sessions opens his mouth i think he's a blithering moron.
He's not a moron; he's just a disgusting human being.
Good.And this post will keep him up all night sobbing into his pillow, I assure you!
yesIdiots will be idiots, no matter what side of the aisle they claim to be on.
Can we be done with ridiculous tribal infighting now, and get back to the fact that our country has become an embarrassing catastrophe?
Thank you for the fantastic advice!I'm also around progressives a hell of a lot and while what DixyCrat cited is at another level, there's definitely a virulent strain out there of folks on the left who go around looking for the latest thing to denounce other people on the left for. It strikes me as Marxist in tone in that they're always all trying to outdo each other with their ideological purity, and I'm loathe to utter words around these people because there's going to be something in the sentences I utter that I'm about to be called out for as being racist, sexist, ableist, unintelligent, et cetera.
It sucks. It's divisive as hell, and potentially career and life destroying - these folks have no compunction about putting your name and/or photo on the Internet to tell other people in their social circles what a racist / sexist / whatever they've decided you are. I avoid these folks like the plague and recommend DixyCrat to do the same; don't engage them.
No, it's gradual awakening I've had to how truly ridiculous some folks can be.I like how the op is super educated but has 1 conversation with some college kids and the entire liberal movement is now bad.
I really don't care about some college kids thoughts; I DO care about Anandtech's thoughts, as it offers a cross section of relatively influential people who are typically professionals. The kind of people who have made up movements, even revolutionary movements, across time.
So if my fellow left-wing radical progressives on ATOT are not crazy, then the field as it will be enacted is not likely against me.
