Question I may be building a new system soon, but not "cutting edge"

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,164
3,947
136
Win10 is EOL in 14 months, although you'll be able to pay for extended support.

Consumer pricing hasn't been announced yet. My guess is the cost will be $25/$50/$100 for the three years, respectively.

MS already announced business pricing: $61/$122/$244 .

I realize people don't like Win11 Spamvertisement edition, but there's not a whole lot of choice going forward IMO.
It's official. Consumers can pay $30 for one year, and one year only, of extended support for Win10:


They should just charge the same $30 for years 2 and 3. That's just free money (and they are supporting enterprises for 3 extra years anyway).

I imagine some clever hackers will figure out how to make the security patches freely available to all takers (like the old WinXP POSReady situation).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 511

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,164
3,947
136
It'll be glorious. 2025: The year of desktop Linux :p
New achievement unlocked.


 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,386
1,913
126
Just discovered I'd created this thread almost exactly a year ago.

If I can just get myself to agree about a motherboard, I could move forward. I WANT an ASUS motherboard. I don't want to "try" another manufacture, like Gigabyte or MSI. And -- I want the Z890 chipset. I'm not even really interested in AsRock boards, which still have some connection to the ASUS manufacture just as a matter of history.

I also want extra PCIE lanes, at least two and possibly 3 full-size PCIE x16 slots and a higher -- not highest -- phase-power design. I'm less interested in spending less if I know I will get less.

Meanwhile, I've got my anxiety about expiring Win 10 security updates totally locked down. It LOOKS LIKE I can smoothly install Win 11 on my hardware, and it LOOKS LIKE it will continue to run smoothly and get future updates.

So my biggest problem in my house now: I almost -- ALMOST -- have too many computers.
 
Jul 27, 2020
26,582
18,291
146
I also want extra PCIE lanes, at least two and possibly 3 full-size PCIE x16 slots and a higher -- not highest -- phase-power design. I'm less interested in spending less if I know I will get less.

Z890 mobos are mainly for overclockers and you are not going to do that so I don't see why you want to spend extra on that. Going with a WS mobo makes more sense since it's supposed to be for serious, stable operation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAPUNISHER

bigboxes

Lifer
Apr 6, 2002
41,922
12,346
146

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,386
1,913
126

Z890 mobos are mainly for overclockers and you are not going to do that so I don't see why you want to spend extra on that. Going with a WS mobo makes more sense since it's supposed to be for serious, stable operation.
Yes . . . I'm still looking at the options and the personal wants and needs. I've long been comfortable with this attitude that I don't NEED the Z890 chipset, but later I may WISH that I had it. So how much is that worth to me?

The biggest dilemma I see with these new motherboards is the lack of PCIE slots -- even for x1, x2 or x4.

I am likely to spend over $400 on the motherboard. I see that I can get a "TUF Gaming" or a "STRIX", but those aren't much cheaper. I have to remind myself that I don't need so many PCIE slots if there are sufficient M.2 sockets on the board, and they feature a combination of PCIE 5.0 and 4.0 sockets.

I'm also picky about phase-power design. Would I pick a board with 12+1+2 or a board with 18+2+1+2? Or even 16+1+2+1 ?

Until I get final settlement in my mind about the choice of a motherboard, I can't pull the string on a parts order. I can even convince myself that I don't need a newer computer, but we all know that sooner or later -- I WILL need one.