Originally posted by: Fausto
I'd reply, but there is no combination of words in the English language sufficiently sarcastic to meet my needs at the moment.
PS- Go you.
Can I blow you now, or do you have more words of wisdom for us?Originally posted by: Vikaden
Originally posted by: Fausto
I'd reply, but there is no combination of words in the English language sufficiently sarcastic to meet my needs at the moment.
PS- Go you.
far out
Originally posted by: Vic
Drivers who equate driving slowly with driving safely are simply covering up for a lack of driving ability. Of course, a good driver always drives at speeds that are appropriate given the conditions, but generally the average so-called "safe" driver out there who does not signal, who cannot use proper lane discipline and stay right, who hasn't adjusted his rear view mirrors since the day they bought the car, and who blocks the roads in rampant angry slow-driving/lane-blocking displays of passive aggressiveness is FAR more dangerous than the so-called "agressive", "dangerous" driver who cruises an open freeway in a well-maintained vehicle at 10 or so over.
Convincing the brainwashed, oblivious, passive-aggressive masses of that fact is pretty much impossible.
The difference in force between decelerating from 60-0 mph and 55-0 mph in less than a tenth of second is not going to be enough to save your life. Differences in braking distances between vehicles and driver awareness and reflex times (hence proper driver education, not the joke they teach now) are more likely to save lives.Originally posted by: Yossarian
the good thing is that when you crash, your car and body will receive exponentially more damage than if you didn't speed.
Originally posted by: Vic
The difference in force between decelerating from 60-0 mph and 55-0 mph in less than a tenth of second is not going to be enough to save your life. Differences in braking distances between vehicles and driver awareness and reflex times (hence proper driver education, not the joke they teach now) are more likely to save lives.Originally posted by: Yossarian
the good thing is that when you crash, your car and body will receive exponentially more damage than if you didn't speed.
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: Vic
The difference in force between decelerating from 60-0 mph and 55-0 mph in less than a tenth of second is not going to be enough to save your life. Differences in braking distances between vehicles and driver awareness and reflex times (hence proper driver education, not the joke they teach now) are more likely to save lives.Originally posted by: Yossarian
the good thing is that when you crash, your car and body will receive exponentially more damage than if you didn't speed.
actually a 3000lb vehicle travelling at 60mph has almost 20% more kinetic energy than if it were going 55.
the rest is just speculation on your part.
Originally posted by: Bryophyte
These girls liked to speed on highways too.
Which explains why 80,000lb vehicles (or hell, even 6,000lb SUVs) have the same speed limits as 3,000lb vehicles, right? Or that before impact reaction distance (time and distance between when the driver sees the distance put before applying the brakes) is usually similar in length (and often shorter) to braking distance? Or that driver inattention, and not speeding, is the leading cause of traffic collisions? Speculation?Originally posted by: Yossarian
actually a 3000lb vehicle travelling at 60mph has almost 20% more kinetic energy than if it were going 55.
the rest is just speculation on your part.
Originally posted by: sharkeeper
We are developing a network that will allow law enforcement agencies to remotely deploy vehicle airbags and apply brakes on some ABS equipped cars. This will be used to stop runaways...
So if they try to pull you over, you had better obey them or else be prepared to be punched in the face like Mr. Tyson was behind the wheel in front of you...
You have been warned Mr. Speeder!
Cheers!
Originally posted by: Vikaden
I like to speed
From me to everyone that thinks they are holier than thou and tell other people how to drive.
BLOW ME!
And not only would very few people wish to pay for Big Brother, but that would work no better than attempts by the software and media industries to prevent piracy. And even if it were make hack-proof, it would still not be effective in preventing most accidents, and likely would even cause quite a few on its own.Originally posted by: virtueixi
I'm sure care manufacturers will love to put those in! I'm sure they customer would equally love to pay for it.Originally posted by: sharkeeper
We are developing a network that will allow law enforcement agencies to remotely deploy vehicle airbags and apply brakes on some ABS equipped cars. This will be used to stop runaways...
So if they try to pull you over, you had better obey them or else be prepared to be punched in the face like Mr. Tyson was behind the wheel in front of you...
You have been warned Mr. Speeder!
Cheers!