i just saw this link, strange...

[wepopfresh]

well, i joined october 5 of 2001 and that doesn't mean a thing.

my opinion is still worth squat, but i'm still a member like those that joined in 1999.

 

[Russ]

I would point out that Ornery has been maintaining an archive of interesting threads for ages. He even has a pic of me edited to look like that wrestler-governor dude. OMG! Should I be worried?

Russ, NCNE

 

[Geekbabe]

<< I would point out that Ornery has been maintaining an archive of interesting threads for ages. He even has a pic of me edited to look like that wrestler-governor dude. OMG! Should I be worried?

Russ, NCNE >>



Actually it's the rest of us that should be worried, that pic blows the glass out of even brand new monitors


Just kidding, I said I was kidding dammit !!!!

 

[Ameesh]

<< "...please don't assume that anyone who asks about this issue or who has heard confusing bits and pieces of whatever happened is trying to cause trouble or should be snapped at."

Are you referring to WW snapping at Ameesh? If so, he's got a pretty poor history with Jean, so I doubt he's surprised by her response. He did apologize, so that's cool. Some other posts I've seen don't seem to qualify as mere curiosity, do they? They're pretty much asking for a flame war, IMO. Can't cry for them when they get what they ask for, now can ya? >>





I have zero history with her as far as i know this is the first post shes ever responded to mine in any thread. She has never pm'd me or i her. and i dont believe we have ever chatted or interacted in anyway before this thread so i'm not sure what she told you but its obviously not true.


as for this thread, i saw the link and was curious if WW had seen the extensive collection someone had made of her posts. It had niether a bad or good connataion attached it to it. (and if you think the word "strange" has a malicious connataion, you need to relax and get that stick out of your butt)


i appreciate all the supporitve pms and especially all the people who came out with public support in this thread. Lets just let this thing drop, the people who are flaming are completely ridiculous, i made a goof up in another thread a long time ago and i apologized for it and yet they are still yapping about it. this thread had no ill intentions for anyone but it looks like people have them for me, and its interesting to see where they come from.

and lastly if Jean wanted to be an adult about it she could have easily pm'd me saying i got her and nowheremom mixed up, and i would have corrected myself publicly, instead she built up some strange hostility against me and is now apparently telling Ornery that we have bad "history" which is total BS.

grow the fvck up.

and let this be an example to all of you who are watching from the sidelines if your not going to refer to her as the second coming dont refer to her at all or the same stuff will happen to you.




im done with this retarded thread.

 

[Ornery]

"What's your reason for asking peoples reasons for posting?"

The ones that I am asking that question to have posted nothing but flame bait and mentioning that they don't understand the reason for the intense interest in the subject, yet they chose to post! Talk about rather odd!

There is also 0sully's mentioning of the fact that SO MANY that troll around hoping to jump into a thread with the name "WombatWoman" in it. I'd like to know why they are among them. I suspect somebody relatively new, like jthsmak, that jumps into such a thread might have a little history here from before they got the new handle. Call it a hunch...


"I have zero history with her as far as i know..."

Does "that stupid bitch" and "that crazy old lady" ring a bell?

"...i saw the link and was curious if WW had seen the extensive collection someone had made of her posts."

That's what you say now, but initially you said, "i find it strange that some one would take so much interest in an online persona." I'm not the only one who thinks your intentions are a little suspect. I find this topic STRANGE, if it wasn't intended to cause trouble. You asked for it, you got it. I cut you some slack and I have the PM to prove it. I'm not the one who kept reviving it either, am I?


"...im done with this retarded thread."

You started it, TARD!

 

[Ameesh]

<< Does "that stupid bitch" and "that crazy old lady" ring a bell? >>




no it doesnt, in fact i invite any subscriber to do a full search on current and archived messages where i am the author. i didnt find a single thread where i used "bitch" to refer to her

either you just made that up or shes lying to you either way one of you is a liar.






<< That's what you say now, but initially you said, "i find it strange that some one would take so much interest in an online persona." I'm not the only one who thinks your intentions are a little suspect. I find this topic STRANGE, if it wasn't intended to cause trouble. You asked for it, you got it. I cut you some slack and I have the PM to prove it. I'm not the one who kept reviving it either, am I? >>




what i said now and what i said initially are no different, and for cutting me some slack you told me you werent offended but obviously that was disingenious. And if a person didnt know you and WW were good friends that site is almost creepy but regardless of that fact it is very stalker-ish. as someone so aptly put it lets call a spade a spade.

 

[jthsmak]

You keep referring to me as if we have been having two-way conversations, Ornery. I had one post. If you want to know my intentions I posted because everyone was giving Ameesh and 0sully a hard time for nothing. My argument was sound. It stopped people from wrongly thinking that 0sully called WW an attention whore. You take more interest in who posted than what was posted. Take the words at face value.

I have had no other names here, ask a mod if you want to. Its not like the stories are a secret to anyone.

 

[Russ]

Ameesh,

I thought you were done with your retarded thread.

Russ, NCNE

 

[Ameesh]

<< Ameesh,

I thought you were done with your retarded thread.

Russ, NCNE >>




true but ornery started making up stuff contrary to what i had said so i thought i should set the record straight before people took his word for it.

 

[GrumpyMan]

I'm going to check out AndyHui's FAQ and see if there's anything on this WW woman everyone speaks of.

 

[docmanhattan]

<< That's what you say now, but initially you said, "i find it strange that some one would take so much interest in an online persona." I'm not the only one who thinks your intentions are a little suspect. I find this topic STRANGE, if it wasn't intended to cause trouble. You asked for it, you got it. >>

I would say that since it's *your* page that's the topic of this thread that your opinion on the intentions of Ameesh might be a bit skewed. And besides which, just because it's not another "rah-rah <insert popular member name here> thread" ( NAPMT? ) doesn't mean it's meant to cause trouble.

<< I cut you some slack and I have the PM to prove it. I'm not the one who kept reviving it either, am I? >>

I hate to say it, but who are you that anyone should care if you "cut some slack" for Ameesh? I haven't read many posts by you, but more and more you really seem to smack of an elitest and condescending attitude to people who haven't been here as long as you have.

edit: ok. i dug through the archives going back to sept. 2000. i didn't feel like going any further. I was able to enjoy posts by Thunderbooty to WW to dennilfloss and everyone inbetween. Strangely, most of the thread topics are pretty much the same as they are now... Anyways, I will retract my snap judgement, as it seems like you're a nef like the rest , but not conscending or elitest toward newbies.

Next week on "As ATOT Turns"...

 

[Cougar]

seriously, who on earth is WombatWoman and why is she so special? I've seen her referred to a few times here and there but all I can piece together is that she's been here a long time and maybe something bad happened to her......pretty vague info. And before you ask, no I ain't gonna search through 8 million threads to figure it out. There's enough people here that seem to be up to speed so I'd imagine someone could post a message saying what the big deal is.

Now, if you feel you must flame me for not knowing then so be it, but until someone speaks out I'm left in the dark.

 

[Ornery]

"no it doesnt, in fact i invite any subscriber to do a full search on current and archived messages where i am the author. i didnt find a single thread where i used "bitch" to refer to her either you just made that up or shes lying to you either way one of you is a liar."

It won't be found here at ATOT, I didn't say it would be. Are you denying you said it?

 

[yllus]

What a surprise. By wishing aloud everyone would shut up and perhaps even let the woman post in peace, I've become one of the faceless conspirators. Ameesh, it looks like our plan to discredit WombatWoman and simultaneously take over the world has failed.

Just in case the reading impaired like BettyBoop happen by (did you only read the words "WombatWoman" and "attention whore" in that paragraph? Way to go.), that was sarcasm. Stop jumping all over great veteran members like the thread originator here and let's all go back to arguing upon topics that inspire a whole lot less aggression. Like whether God exists or if celibacy = pedophilia. *thumbs up!*

Edit: I am not replying to this thread anymore. For real, like not Ameesh did.

 

[Ameesh]

<< "no it doesnt, in fact i invite any subscriber to do a full search on current and archived messages where i am the author. i didnt find a single thread where i used "bitch" to refer to her either you just made that up or shes lying to you either way one of you is a liar."

It won't be found here at ATOT, I didn't say it would be. Are you denying you said it? >>




yeah i deny it, i'd like to see a link or screenshot, i would remeber getting thrashed on aduls board by baffeld, GF, or Adul if i said anything like that.