I actually agree with virtualgames0 and that you should be able to return a product if you are not satisfied with it and that is what he did. I do think that there should have been a fee, however. When you buy something it's not a free trial at all- you bought it.
Now, there are only a few things in this world that bother me and stupidity is one of them, especially when coupled with inconsistancy. And that is the issue I have with virtualgames0, not the fact that he returned, technically, damaged goods.
You pointed out that people all over the internet are complaining about how easy it is to scratch an Ipod. I'd think that before dropping $200 on something you'd do a little research, no? What's the point of finding these things out after the fact? Just so you can feel better about not being the only whiney little bitch out there?
And if it makes sense to throw down extra cash for decent headphones, wouldn't it make sense to put in an extra $30 for a protective case/cover or... and you might want to sit down for this one.. an ARMBAND for the gym? If decent headphones over the stock ones increase your enjoyment of the product, wouldn't a screen cover do the same?
The biggest issue I have with you, though, are your analogies. They're awful, just terrible. Putting all your eggs in one basket? Cheap headphones and an expensive DAP is nothing like "putting all of your eggs in one basket." And your car fender falling off from regular use? Come on, man! How about something that's actually similar to what happened? You took your new car out on a dirt road (regular use, right?) and scratched the paint (or, gasp! the windshield?) from flying rocks (jeans! what the hell were you thinking?!). You make me embarrassed to like Frou Frou.