glenn1
Lifer
- Sep 6, 2000
- 25,383
- 1,013
- 126
How can you form a well regulated militia without weapons?
The average 2A supporter without a weapon is still more effective at defending people than any policy a progressive ever came up with.
How can you form a well regulated militia without weapons?
So are you saying that GUN NUTTERS are part of an insurrection and a rebellion?? If you are I would agree!!
The sad part is most of you are cowards and would never even want to be part of a well regulated militia!!How can you form a well regulated militia without weapons?
The sad part is most of you are cowards and would never even want to be part of a well regulated militia!!
It`s all about the Gunz baby!!!
We all know that vehicles kill far more children every year than firearms do. Have you given up your car yet, or are you just another typical libtard hypocrite that wants everyone else to make sacrifices except for themselves?Ah so Spidey was right for once!! You do have this thing about penises!!!
The sad part is most of you are cowards and would never even want to be part of a well regulated militia!!
It`s all about the Gunz baby!!!
Proof of said claim please? I won't deny that some would indeed be cowards, I'm just asking for evidence that it would be most.
Side note. If you have served in the military, a sincere thank you for your service. If you served in actual hostile territory / came under fire, an extra special thank you.
Yo dumdum, you think there is a connection between the evolution of mankind and the evolution of transportation? Google motherfucker, you speak it?We all know that vehicles kill far more children every year than firearms do. Have you given up your car yet, or are you just another typical libtard hypocrite that wants everyone else to make sacrifices except for themselves?
Yo dumdum, you think there is a connection between the evolution of mankind and the evolution of transportation? Google motherfucker, you speak it?
But yea ... guns... cars... same fucking shit.
Its a moot-non-point anyway, in a decade they will be all self-navigating... away with the human factor and no more accidents. Now about those self-navigating guns.
Dumdum.
As long as automobiles are widespread, you're a fool to think there won't be any more accidents ever. The point is we understand that cars bring enough benefit to us that we're willing to take the risk of having them widely in use in society, we feel the good outweighs the bad. With guns, thankfully some very forward thinking individuals codified that right, because they felt that the good of society being armed outweighed the bad. And when we compare guns to other rights, liberties, and conveniences that can and do kills us, guns do comparatively little damage, and yet have a tremendous upside. With that said, it is hard to argue for further restrictions on guns. Just because you personally don't feel their benefit is greater than their downside is meaningless here. Let's look at guns as a right that can cause harm and weigh that against other things in society that do the same. That's why I continually bring up tobacco and how no Democrat is running on a platform of further limiting that much, MUCH larger killer than firearms. It is obvious that the laser focus on guns is nothing more than NPC programming by your handlers. They don't care about saving lives, they care about their political agenda.
As long as automobiles are widespread, you're a fool to think there won't be any more accidents ever. The point is we understand that cars bring enough benefit to us that we're willing to take the risk of having them widely in use in society, we feel the good outweighs the bad. With guns, thankfully some very forward thinking individuals codified that right, because they felt that the good of society being armed outweighed the bad. And when we compare guns to other rights, liberties, and conveniences that can and do kills us, guns do comparatively little damage, and yet have a tremendous upside. With that said, it is hard to argue for further restrictions on guns. Just because you personally don't feel their benefit is greater than their downside is meaningless here. Let's look at guns as a right that can cause harm and weigh that against other things in society that do the same. That's why I continually bring up tobacco and how no Democrat is running on a platform of further limiting that much, MUCH larger killer than firearms. It is obvious that the laser focus on guns is nothing more than NPC programming by your handlers. They don't care about saving lives, they care about their political agenda.
Truth hurts?? What I said is true!1 None of you idiots care one bit about being part of a well rregulated militia!!!The first step in creating a well regulated militia is excluding dumbasses like you from the militia.
So your telling me that you would gladly become part of a well regulated militia and go through combat raining and learn how to work as a team player in agroup with others who are gun owners? You see in the end this has nothing to do with the while 2nd amendment -- it only has to do with your right to own gunz!! It is all about the gunz, baby!!How can you form a well regulated militia without weapons?
Lets clarify that...… a lot of people on these forums would be the first out of their house to get together with other gunj owners and form a militia if needed!Proof of said claim please? I won't deny that some would indeed be cowards, I'm just asking for evidence that it would be most.
Side note. If you have served in the military, a sincere thank you for your service. If you served in actual hostile territory / came under fire, an extra special thank you.
I am part of a regulated militia. Since our political officials are the ones doing the regulating it doesn't happen to be well done is all.
Time for a Founding Fathers quote.So you were there at the Bundy ranch? Or was it Srebrenica?
Time for a Founding Fathers quote.
“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”
– George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 "
Again you pick and choose! use the whole quote! You see my main objextion to the use of the word Militia is that we have a lot of xcowards who have guns who would run and hide if they were ever called upon to be part of a militia.....Time for a Founding Fathers quote.
“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”
– George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 "
Gee wizz I didn`t know that....hmmmmmmView attachment 10625
Again you pick and choose! use the whole quote! You see my main objextion to the use of the word Militia is that we have a lot of xcowards who have guns who would run and hide if they were ever called upon to be part of a militia.....
I sense you have your personal rock all picked out to hide under!!
Yes.When you look for founding father quotes they seem to be overwhelmingly FOR the individual right to own arms as that provides the ability to form a militia to fight back against an invader or tyrannical government.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
- Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789
When you look for founding father quotes they seem to be overwhelmingly FOR the individual right to own arms as that provides the ability to form a militia to fight back against an invader or tyrannical government.
We know you didn't research those quotes yourself, so what's the source?