• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I have a difficult time understanding why people complain about Wal-Mart....

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: tomywishbone
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I have cockroaches in my kitchen but I pay no attention to them because there are billions more outside.

😀 I don't know what this means, I just like it.

It means a couple of things. First it means, if you are stupid like me you don't deal with immediate problems because that would just lead to dealing with more if you have any success, but that if you are smart you step on those cockroaches you can that are within your reach, the big fat ones like in your kitchen or the WalMart down the street.
 
What I find funny is that the people who rail against WalMart and the insurance thing are the same people who complain about Walmart running mom-and-pop shops into the ground. The funny thing is Mom-and-pop shops generally pay lower, have no advancement opportunities, have absolutely NO benefits (medical, 401K, paid vacation, etc.).
 
Originally posted by: shrumpage
I like Wal-mart, we shop there all the time. When ya got kids and need to get clothes its a great place to go, even then we try to get stuff off the clearance rack.

I used to work in a low end retail job - it sucked. The pay was low, and my fellow co-works (with a few exceptions) weren't the brightest bunch. It doesn't take much skill to stock shelves, ring people up, or clean. I don't expect to make 10-15 bucks an hour doing it. Since then I've worked my way up via better jobs AND education.

Having a low paying job can be a great motivator.

One thing in our country is most people aren't motivated for making themselves better. If they can make by with 10 bucks an hour and putting on 2K of credit card debt every month then that is OK. They don't think for the future like when johnny needs braces.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Shivetya

unionizing low paying jobs only serves to fatten the unions war chest, it does nothing for the workers

Wrong.

Anyways, the reason why so many people talk trash about Wal-Mart is because they are the single largest target. If you have limited resources to put towards something, you can run issue ads against Uncle Jimmy's hardware store that maybe 1000 people know about, or Wal-Mart that billions of people know about. It's just the smart thing to do.

Also, Wal-Mart's treatment of their employees is particularly crappy even compared to other outlets with similar employee demographics.

The thing is almost all retail-industries are the same.

1. Low wages or lack of living wages
2. Sometimes little to no healthcare
3. Wage disparities between M and F
4. Poor treatment of employees.

This is pretty similar. I can name about 10 different employers who do the same. Conversley there are a lot of large high paying companies that have some of these points.

The difference between your 10 different employers is they are not the largest employer in the free world. Nor are they headed by some of the richest people in the world. This is Carnegie and the railroad barons all over again. The unions put an end to their practices and will do so for the WalMart employees as well. Here's your scenario:

Mom and Pop Hardware Store employs 6 people and pays them $2 an hour over minimum wage because their employees are dedicated to Mom and Pop and are interested in Mom and Pop's hardware store doing well.
WalMart moves to town and the people rejoice at the massive savings they get on Chinese made products. Mom and Pop can't compete and go out of business, the 6 employees at Mom and Pops need to get new jobs. Hey look! WalMart is hiring, but offering less and no health insurance. But what are you going to do? You gotta eat. Oh and WalMart is only going to give you 38 hours a week, which in your state means you're not working full time, hence, you're a part time worker and don't get the benefits and protection full time employment offers. Add all this up and you really don't give a crap if your employer is successful, you have a crap attitude and it shows at work, you treat your customers accordingly.

WalMart's size in the industry is enormous, suppliers have never seen such a monopolistic retailer. It allows WalMart to put huge pressure on suppliers to provide WalMart with exceptional savings on price/shipping etc that smaller businesses cannot compete with. This causes these suppliers to cut costs, reduce overhead and then their employees feel the pinch. All of the sudden their benefits are being cut, the supplier has no choice, they have to sell their product and WalMart is really the only game in town.

It is a vicious spiral downwards and "business first" conservatives can kiss my No WalMart Shopping Ass.


Quite the doom and gloom portrait you paint. I bet you sleep better at night believing such crap. Mom and Pop paying 2 bucks above min wage arent providing health insurance nor benefits either. So why arent you ragging on mom and pop shops for such crummy working conditions? Since we have established both employers offer sub par working conditions. Isnt it better if one provides lower prices to the consumer?

And all of those companies previously mentioned have buying power and do their best to negotiate the lowest possible price using that buying power. Pointing out Walmart as a sole beneficiary of such negotiation is a half truth.

btw which states have 38 hour full time requirement? i am pretty sure most states are 32 hours.

Yeah his 38 hour requirement is b.s.. The part/full time only comes in when your dealing with benefits. A person working full will likely get more reduction in medical insurance. Most companies have a graduate system where the more you work on average in a month the more reduction you get in medical bene up to 40 hours being the highest benefit. If not that then a 3 or 4 tier hour system.
 
Originally posted by: CPA
What I find funny is that the people who rail against WalMart and the insurance thing are the same people who complain about Walmart running mom-and-pop shops into the ground. The funny thing is Mom-and-pop shops generally pay lower, have no advancement opportunities, have absolutely NO benefits (medical, 401K, paid vacation, etc.).

Most of the people who complain about wal-mart are those who feel they should get something for nothing. The Canadian type of mentality. I worked to get my status in life and my great medical benefts. I worked at Office Depot, hotels and did odd jobs to move my self up. The very things people complain about I've experienced myself. But by no means did I feel Office Depot for example was my last option or main place I would work the rest of my life!!!!!!! I also did not feel Office Depot for example would have an income to raise a family.
 
Originally posted by: CPA
What I find funny is that the people who rail against WalMart and the insurance thing are the same people who complain about Walmart running mom-and-pop shops into the ground. The funny thing is Mom-and-pop shops generally pay lower, have no advancement opportunities, have absolutely NO benefits (medical, 401K, paid vacation, etc.).

Now why do you suppose you say that? Turn off Limabaugh and Faux "News." I have now placed the onus of proof on you to show that your statement is historically accurate.
 
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Originally posted by: CPA
What I find funny is that the people who rail against WalMart and the insurance thing are the same people who complain about Walmart running mom-and-pop shops into the ground. The funny thing is Mom-and-pop shops generally pay lower, have no advancement opportunities, have absolutely NO benefits (medical, 401K, paid vacation, etc.).

Most of the people who complain about wal-mart are those who feel they should get something for nothing. The Canadian type of mentality. I worked to get my status in life and my great medical benefts. I worked at Office Depot, hotels and did odd jobs to move my self up. The very things people complain about I've experienced myself. But by no means did I feel Office Depot for example was my last option or main place I would work the rest of my life!!!!!!! I also did not feel Office Depot for example would have an income to raise a family.

Take your Ayn Rand philosophy and shove it up your ass. I have a phd, great benefits, and decent pay. By your copy/paste philosophy i should just shit on the workers in this nation that have not or not able to do so? :roll:
 
I know I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth and I really hope such words don't come back to bite me, but the fact is if you are working at Walmart, you need to understand that it's going to suck, your benefits and pay will suck. That is what you get for scraping the bottom of the barrel with your employment. If you don't like it, get an education. Get motivated. Give a @(#* about your family and your life and stop doing a job that a machine and do better (as they do, automated checkout machines right next to you doing what you do while you ring things through the register).

Frankly, we live in a damn lucky society if we can take people with the crappiest jobs in our economy (walmart) and those jobs can actually provide for a family and food and shelter--WHICH THEY CAN. They just can't do it as well as the job of somebody who dumped 4 years into university and maybe more and is doing a job that cannot be automated by a machine with a scanner and a few touch-screen commands.

Anybody who just read this knows I'm right, even if they wish I weren't.
 
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: CPA
What I find funny is that the people who rail against WalMart and the insurance thing are the same people who complain about Walmart running mom-and-pop shops into the ground. The funny thing is Mom-and-pop shops generally pay lower, have no advancement opportunities, have absolutely NO benefits (medical, 401K, paid vacation, etc.).

Now why do you suppose you say that? Turn off Limabaugh and Faux "News." I have now placed the onus of proof on you to show that your statement is historically accurate.


Huh? How about you show us these high paying, great benefit, Mom and Pop shops with great advancement opportunities?

So how much do you think a district manager position at Freds corner store pays? Especially considering that Fred probably only has one store....
 
I don't like the fact that they are slowly becoming the only choice. I don't like the people who work there (they look miserable and give the minimalest effort) and they sell the lowest quality of product they can pull off. I hate going to malls nowadays since they are slowly being eaten away due to businesses closing. It pisses me off that I more or less am forced to shop online where I do not get to see the product in reallife prior to purchase.
 
Originally posted by: homercles337
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
If you have no degree of higher education, no special skills and no job experience. What the hell do you expect. EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS THEIR WAY UP. PEOPLE DON'T GET THINGS FOR FREE. This is not Canada. You have to do something to get something. I don't understand why people feel they have to make a living wage at wal-mart. A living wage is based on how you live on it. If you expect a house a car medical insurance and a good meal on the table with Wal-mart your living in a dream world. Unless your a manager or even a district manager of the company your dreaming.

Wow, i am just wowed everytime i look into P&N. Honestly sometimes i feel like its trying to teach quantum mechanics to some one with no math background at all. Where the hell do you start? Obviously with the math, but its quantum mechanics and you should have prerequisite math before showing up. Too many posters here dont have the prerequisites to post the shit that they do. 🙁

Well I for one and honored that such an acomplished quantum mechanic such as yourself is willing to take the time out of your busy day to enlighten us. :roll:
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: steppinthrax

If you have no degree of higher education, no special skills and no job experience.

What the hell do you expect.

EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS THEIR WAY UP. PEOPLE DON'T GET THINGS FOR FREE. This is not Canada. You have to do something to get something.

I don't understand why people feel they have to make a living wage at wal-mart.

A living wage is based on how you live on it. If you expect a house a car medical insurance and a good meal on the table with Wal-mart your living in a dream world. Unless your a manager or even a district manager of the company your dreaming.

So what kind of living do you expect out of a full 40 hour work week?

Enough to live in a cardboard box in a park, barely enough to eat and no health insurance?

Like I said, Low expectations for America.

Welcome to Third World America supported by steppinthrax and his Republican friends.

So you actually think people with no degrees or ambition or people who didn`t apply themselves in school should get a free ride just because others who applied themselves and studied or for that matter went to tech school or a trade school and learned a trade should get the same benefits that those of us who worked hard and didn`t complain when others who had more education were paid better and recieved benefit packages.......hmmmmm

"Why should a job that requires zero skills, zero training pay 40k/year?"
 
I think a big problem in this country is that false statement that "you can be anything you want to be." That is the biggest bunch of bull****. Some people are born with much greater advantages than others. some people don't ever really have a chance to get a better job than Walmart. People need to be more understanding and compassionate in regard to those who don't have the same opportunites. People need to stop assuming that everyone has the opportunity to "do something" with their lives. For some of us, "doing something with our lives" is a simple statement. For others, it is incredibly complicated and has to do with much more than just financial and educational issues.

The problem with Walmart is that they make billions and the worker bees don't see any of it except a pittance. If Walmart didn't make much money that would be different. However, like most companies, there is a huge discrepancy between what the people n the top make as opposed to the people on the bottom. Obviously the people on the top should make more. But, I think the pay should balance out a little bit more b/c the people on the top would be without a job if it were not for the people on the bottom. I understand that this would mean slower growth for Walmart. But, if people really care about other people like the Walmart ads seem to insinuate, growth would be on the same level with quality of company.
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: steppinthrax

If you have no degree of higher education, no special skills and no job experience.

What the hell do you expect.

EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS THEIR WAY UP. PEOPLE DON'T GET THINGS FOR FREE. This is not Canada. You have to do something to get something.

I don't understand why people feel they have to make a living wage at wal-mart.

A living wage is based on how you live on it. If you expect a house a car medical insurance and a good meal on the table with Wal-mart your living in a dream world. Unless your a manager or even a district manager of the company your dreaming.

So what kind of living do you expect out of a full 40 hour work week?

Enough to live in a cardboard box in a park, barely enough to eat and no health insurance?

Like I said, Low expectations for America.

Welcome to Third World America supported by steppinthrax and his Republican friends.

So you actually think people with no degrees or ambition or people who didn`t apply themselves in school should get a free ride just because others who applied themselves and studied or for that matter went to tech school or a trade school and learned a trade should get the same benefits that those of us who worked hard and didn`t complain when others who had more education were paid better and recieved benefit packages.......hmmmmm

"Why should a job that requires zero skills, zero training pay 40k/year?"

I didn't say that.

I simply said you guys support those working 40 hours at Walmart to only be able live in a cardboard box and the resounding answer is yes.

Congrats on your Third Worldization of America, you've succeeded well while your Corporate Execs rake in billions.
 
Also there is a technical issue with this as well. What is the main or most important person in the store. The Cashier. If you've been to a store recently they have electronic checkout lines. Right now they are just accompanying actual human begins. At home depot for example they have 4 of such machines being supervised by one employee. We all know one thing leads to another and once the door opens it can only get wider. I don't see in the future why you can't have 8 to 10 of these such machines while one or two employees supervise people from a one-way mirror booth. I mean with a machine it never takes a break, never gets pregnant, hurt, go postal, create unions, bitch, sue you among other things.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: steppinthrax

If you have no degree of higher education, no special skills and no job experience.

What the hell do you expect.

EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS THEIR WAY UP. PEOPLE DON'T GET THINGS FOR FREE. This is not Canada. You have to do something to get something.

I don't understand why people feel they have to make a living wage at wal-mart.

A living wage is based on how you live on it. If you expect a house a car medical insurance and a good meal on the table with Wal-mart your living in a dream world. Unless your a manager or even a district manager of the company your dreaming.

So what kind of living do you expect out of a full 40 hour work week?

Enough to live in a cardboard box in a park, barely enough to eat and no health insurance?

Like I said, Low expectations for America.

Welcome to Third World America supported by steppinthrax and his Republican friends.

So you actually think people with no degrees or ambition or people who didn`t apply themselves in school should get a free ride just because others who applied themselves and studied or for that matter went to tech school or a trade school and learned a trade should get the same benefits that those of us who worked hard and didn`t complain when others who had more education were paid better and recieved benefit packages.......hmmmmm

"Why should a job that requires zero skills, zero training pay 40k/year?"

I didn't say that.

I simply said you guys support those working 40 hours at Walmart to only be able live in a cardboard box and the resounding answer is yes.

Congrats on your Third Worldization of America, you've succeeded well while your Corporate Execs rake in billions.


You need to visit other counteries like China where labor workers are treated considerbly worse and have almost no rights compared to US labor workers.
 
I don't complain about them as a corporation really, but as a shopping experience, they suck. The Mrs goes there for stuff like bird feed, cat food, cosmetic stuff, household cleaners, but I never go near the place anymore. Crowded, narrow isles, long checkout lines, and the parking lot is a zoo.
 
The reason I hate Walmart is because, as a result of them dictating price to their manufacturers, their manufacturers often use inferior components/manufacturing methods. In short, a lot of the products at Walmart are crappy quality. However, because the price is so good on them, many people purchase those goods instead of similar, slightly more expensive goods from local stores that specialize in that type of product.

Now, those local stores not only have the somewhat lower quality items, but they also carry several tiers of those items they specialize in, in terms of quality. Now, since the lower level quality items still constituted the majority of their sales, they're left trying to compete on level of service as well as their higher quality items. Unfortunately, many of these stores end up going out of business, and the consumer loses choices.

To try to give a more concrete example, go out and try to buy a quality badmitton set. Some of the sporting goods stores near me used to sell sets that could even be passed down a generation. Those stores are out of business. Alas, now all that's available are the crappy $9.99 sets, the like of which Walmart sells.

So, hurray, we can all purchase our goods for less money. Quite honestly, I really don't mind for a lot of types of purchases. However, Walmart impacts so many other "niches" that overall, there's a decrease in the quality of items available to purchase.
 
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I don't complain about them as a corporation really, but as a shopping experience, they suck. The Mrs goes there for stuff like bird feed, cat food, cosmetic stuff, household cleaners, but I never go near the place anymore. Crowded, narrow isles, long checkout lines, and the parking lot is a zoo.
Amen, but you know what? Only 99% of walmarts are like that. 99% of them are zoos full of riff-raff and white trash and crowding and inbreds meandering down isles at .02 mph or in the parking lot surprised that a car is trying to drive down an aisle but 1% of them are not and one recently opened by our house that falls in the 1%. It is quite pleasant and in an area so uncrowded that parking is no problem, the riff raff haven't yet spilled in, and it's really not a bad place to visit.
 
We have a local super-wallmart, but I think as stores goes it is right up there with target or best buy or a lot of the other stores like k-mart or the dollar store or whatever else you might see. It is just another junky retail store that sells lots of plastic junk and cheap to standard food and goods for the masses. Sometimes I go there and sometimes I dont. It is a large store, so it makes for a nice walk.
 
Originally posted by: DrPizza
The reason I hate Walmart is because, as a result of them dictating price to their manufacturers, their manufacturers often use inferior components/manufacturing methods. In short, a lot of the products at Walmart are crappy quality. However, because the price is so good on them, many people purchase those goods instead of similar, slightly more expensive goods from local stores that specialize in that type of product.

Now, those local stores not only have the somewhat lower quality items, but they also carry several tiers of those items they specialize in, in terms of quality. Now, since the lower level quality items still constituted the majority of their sales, they're left trying to compete on level of service as well as their higher quality items. Unfortunately, many of these stores end up going out of business, and the consumer loses choices.

To try to give a more concrete example, go out and try to buy a quality badmitton set. Some of the sporting goods stores near me used to sell sets that could even be passed down a generation. Those stores are out of business. Alas, now all that's available are the crappy $9.99 sets, the like of which Walmart sells.

So, hurray, we can all purchase our goods for less money. Quite honestly, I really don't mind for a lot of types of purchases. However, Walmart impacts so many other "niches" that overall, there's a decrease in the quality of items available to purchase.

That may be true for "niche" items, but you are flase that it is somehow the rule and not the exception. The products WalMart carries are the smae EXACT products most other retailers carry. So the argument they carry nothing but crap is...well...crap. They sell what people buy.

The WalMart haters place the blame of ma and pa shops going out of business on WalMart, instead of where it belongs: on the consumer. If Billy Bob needs an oil change, why would he go to Joe's Auto shop and get a LOF for 29.99 when he can go to WalMart and get the exact same LOF, including oil of his choice, for 19.99? With all this talk of inflation, over-pricing, etc, I would think more of you would favor a store who sells the same thing for less? I guess not. In your example, a badminton set. Perhaps if consumers bought more $99 dollar sets ma and pa sporting goods would be in business yes? Is it WalMart's fault if people dont WANT to pay $99 for a badmonton set? Is it? The beauty of free market is is...if both the buyer and the seller are happy, it's a fair deal. Thus, WalMart passed Exxon as the largest company on the planet this year. They offer what people want. It's not being force fed. Sure, they dont provide high-end niche items. Thats not their market! If I want a cheap computer for the wife to surf on and chat on while Im gaming, hell yeah I'll go to WalMart and get one for $199.99. It's cheaper than building it myself WITH THE SAME PARTS! If I want a gaming rig, I dont go there. If I want a cheap stereo for the kids room (if I had kids), hell yeah I'd go to WalMart and buy a $99 setup. If I want to buy a new surround sound receiver, I go to a specialty store. Can someone explain why I would want to pay 2.99 for a jar of JIF peanut butter instead of 1.99? WTF is the difference?

Where's the problem?
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: DrPizza
The reason I hate Walmart is because, as a result of them dictating price to their manufacturers, their manufacturers often use inferior components/manufacturing methods. In short, a lot of the products at Walmart are crappy quality. However, because the price is so good on them, many people purchase those goods instead of similar, slightly more expensive goods from local stores that specialize in that type of product.

Now, those local stores not only have the somewhat lower quality items, but they also carry several tiers of those items they specialize in, in terms of quality. Now, since the lower level quality items still constituted the majority of their sales, they're left trying to compete on level of service as well as their higher quality items. Unfortunately, many of these stores end up going out of business, and the consumer loses choices.

To try to give a more concrete example, go out and try to buy a quality badmitton set. Some of the sporting goods stores near me used to sell sets that could even be passed down a generation. Those stores are out of business. Alas, now all that's available are the crappy $9.99 sets, the like of which Walmart sells.

So, hurray, we can all purchase our goods for less money. Quite honestly, I really don't mind for a lot of types of purchases. However, Walmart impacts so many other "niches" that overall, there's a decrease in the quality of items available to purchase.

That may be true for "niche" items, but you are flase that it is somehow the rule and not the exception. The products WalMart carries are the smae EXACT products most other retailers carry. So the argument they carry nothing but crap is...well...crap. They sell what people buy.


Where's the problem?

Wrong. Many manufactors have their own "wal-mart" line. The items have the same name and most of the time look the same, but are made much cheaper. Look at Levis. They have a factory that makes jeans only for wal-mart. They say Levis like other retailers but are made much cheaper just for wal-mart to meet their price demands. Same for other products. Yes some are the same, but a lot of them are not. YMMV when shopping at wal-mart.

 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: DrPizza
The reason I hate Walmart is because, as a result of them dictating price to their manufacturers, their manufacturers often use inferior components/manufacturing methods. In short, a lot of the products at Walmart are crappy quality. However, because the price is so good on them, many people purchase those goods instead of similar, slightly more expensive goods from local stores that specialize in that type of product.

Now, those local stores not only have the somewhat lower quality items, but they also carry several tiers of those items they specialize in, in terms of quality. Now, since the lower level quality items still constituted the majority of their sales, they're left trying to compete on level of service as well as their higher quality items. Unfortunately, many of these stores end up going out of business, and the consumer loses choices.

To try to give a more concrete example, go out and try to buy a quality badmitton set. Some of the sporting goods stores near me used to sell sets that could even be passed down a generation. Those stores are out of business. Alas, now all that's available are the crappy $9.99 sets, the like of which Walmart sells.

So, hurray, we can all purchase our goods for less money. Quite honestly, I really don't mind for a lot of types of purchases. However, Walmart impacts so many other "niches" that overall, there's a decrease in the quality of items available to purchase.

That may be true for "niche" items, but you are flase that it is somehow the rule and not the exception. The products WalMart carries are the smae EXACT products most other retailers carry. So the argument they carry nothing but crap is...well...crap. They sell what people buy.

The WalMart haters place the blame of ma and pa shops going out of business on WalMart, instead of where it belongs: on the consumer. If Billy Bob needs an oil change, why would he go to Joe's Auto shop and get a LOF for 29.99 when he can go to WalMart and get the exact same LOF, including oil of his choice, for 19.99? With all this talk of inflation, over-pricing, etc, I would think more of you would favor a store who sells the same thing for less? I guess not. In your example, a badminton set. Perhaps if consumers bought more $99 dollar sets ma and pa sporting goods would be in business yes? Is it WalMart's fault if people dont WANT to pay $99 for a badmonton set? Is it? The beauty of free market is is...if both the buyer and the seller are happy, it's a fair deal. Thus, WalMart passed Exxon as the largest company on the planet this year. They offer what people want. It's not being force fed. Sure, they dont provide high-end niche items. Thats not their market! If I want a cheap computer for the wife to surf on and chat on while Im gaming, hell yeah I'll go to WalMart and get one for $199.99. It's cheaper than building it myself WITH THE SAME PARTS! If I want a gaming rig, I dont go there. If I want a cheap stereo for the kids room (if I had kids), hell yeah I'd go to WalMart and buy a $99 setup. If I want to buy a new surround sound receiver, I go to a specialty store. Can someone explain why I would want to pay 2.99 for a jar of JIF peanut butter instead of 1.99? WTF is the difference?

Where's the problem?

I think the thing your sacrificing when you go to Wal-Mart is the shopping experience. When I buy things at Wal-mart it's common to see crushed packaging and or missing components. Wal-mart employees are some of the rudest around. However, they are improving their customer service in some ways. Their turnover is quite high. However, when they get new employees they come with "young blood" and a smile on their face. When I see this I think in my head yeah you act like this it will only last and it does. They are usually out in 1 month or so. I would say the entire store staff changes every 1 year. But that is what you expect if you want to buy from the cheapest in town. They cut corners in ways to accommodate the customer more then anything.

 
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: steppinthrax

If you have no degree of higher education, no special skills and no job experience.

What the hell do you expect.

EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS THEIR WAY UP. PEOPLE DON'T GET THINGS FOR FREE. This is not Canada. You have to do something to get something.

I don't understand why people feel they have to make a living wage at wal-mart.

A living wage is based on how you live on it. If you expect a house a car medical insurance and a good meal on the table with Wal-mart your living in a dream world. Unless your a manager or even a district manager of the company your dreaming.

So what kind of living do you expect out of a full 40 hour work week?

Enough to live in a cardboard box in a park, barely enough to eat and no health insurance?

Like I said, Low expectations for America.

Welcome to Third World America supported by steppinthrax and his Republican friends.

So you actually think people with no degrees or ambition or people who didn`t apply themselves in school should get a free ride just because others who applied themselves and studied or for that matter went to tech school or a trade school and learned a trade should get the same benefits that those of us who worked hard and didn`t complain when others who had more education were paid better and recieved benefit packages.......hmmmmm

"Why should a job that requires zero skills, zero training pay 40k/year?"

I didn't say that.

I simply said you guys support those working 40 hours at Walmart to only be able live in a cardboard box and the resounding answer is yes.

Congrats on your Third Worldization of America, you've succeeded well while your Corporate Execs rake in billions.


You need to visit other counteries like China where labor workers are treated considerbly worse and have almost no rights compared to US labor workers.

Give it time, we're getting there thanks to you and your heroes.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: DrPizza
The reason I hate Walmart is because, as a result of them dictating price to their manufacturers, their manufacturers often use inferior components/manufacturing methods. In short, a lot of the products at Walmart are crappy quality. However, because the price is so good on them, many people purchase those goods instead of similar, slightly more expensive goods from local stores that specialize in that type of product.

Now, those local stores not only have the somewhat lower quality items, but they also carry several tiers of those items they specialize in, in terms of quality. Now, since the lower level quality items still constituted the majority of their sales, they're left trying to compete on level of service as well as their higher quality items. Unfortunately, many of these stores end up going out of business, and the consumer loses choices.

To try to give a more concrete example, go out and try to buy a quality badmitton set. Some of the sporting goods stores near me used to sell sets that could even be passed down a generation. Those stores are out of business. Alas, now all that's available are the crappy $9.99 sets, the like of which Walmart sells.

So, hurray, we can all purchase our goods for less money. Quite honestly, I really don't mind for a lot of types of purchases. However, Walmart impacts so many other "niches" that overall, there's a decrease in the quality of items available to purchase.

That may be true for "niche" items, but you are flase that it is somehow the rule and not the exception. The products WalMart carries are the smae EXACT products most other retailers carry. So the argument they carry nothing but crap is...well...crap. They sell what people buy.

The WalMart haters place the blame of ma and pa shops going out of business on WalMart, instead of where it belongs: on the consumer. If Billy Bob needs an oil change, why would he go to Joe's Auto shop and get a LOF for 29.99 when he can go to WalMart and get the exact same LOF, including oil of his choice, for 19.99? With all this talk of inflation, over-pricing, etc, I would think more of you would favor a store who sells the same thing for less? I guess not. In your example, a badminton set. Perhaps if consumers bought more $99 dollar sets ma and pa sporting goods would be in business yes? Is it WalMart's fault if people dont WANT to pay $99 for a badmonton set? Is it? The beauty of free market is is...if both the buyer and the seller are happy, it's a fair deal. Thus, WalMart passed Exxon as the largest company on the planet this year. They offer what people want. It's not being force fed. Sure, they dont provide high-end niche items. Thats not their market! If I want a cheap computer for the wife to surf on and chat on while Im gaming, hell yeah I'll go to WalMart and get one for $199.99. It's cheaper than building it myself WITH THE SAME PARTS! If I want a gaming rig, I dont go there. If I want a cheap stereo for the kids room (if I had kids), hell yeah I'd go to WalMart and buy a $99 setup. If I want to buy a new surround sound receiver, I go to a specialty store. Can someone explain why I would want to pay 2.99 for a jar of JIF peanut butter instead of 1.99? WTF is the difference?

Where's the problem?

You and people like you are slowing killing America. Why do you hate America so much?
Picture it this way:
Communist Premier of China standing on the corner selling his $1.99 jar of peanut butter
On the other corner is Grandma and grandpa Jones with their 14 employees standing behind them selling their $2.99 jar of peanut butter

It is that simple. Really.
At what cost do your precious cost savings really cost America?
Buy American
 
Back
Top