I hate it how Christians attribute random events of life to "miracles."

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Garth

Which part?

The part where he would have made it not happen. I've stated this already at least twice, but I'll do it again. Consider a baby learning to walk. Each time that baby falls in his attempt, is it your fault as his guardian that he fell? You knew he would, you knew it was inevitable. But is it your fault then since you had the foreknowledge to know that he was going to fall, and you still let him?
You do not get to say that you didn't want the baby to fall if you have the full opportunity and capacity to stop it.

{snip}

You're still not understanding. Consider this: If you stood in front of a person's gun, knowing that they were going to pull the trigger, you don't get to say that you didn't want to be shot. If you didn't want to get shot, you'd move out of the way.

I'm really not sure I understand what you're saying there. Please explain that one.
Another analogy.

You set up a device that will drop a massive boulder on a certain spot at a precise time. If you were to go stand under the boulder when it drops, you don't get to say you didn't want to be crushed. You had full opportunity and capacity to affect the outcome. If you didn't want to be crushed, all you had to do is stand somewhere else.

Saying that God wants all to be saved despite that some are not is like saying you do not want to be crushed by the boulder as you stand directly under it.

He could've made it different if he didn't want it to happen. There is nothing stopping him.

But that is the flaw. There is something stopping him.
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought we were talking about an omnipotent being.

His promise to let us grow and to become like him. As I said before, he is bound by promises that he makes to each of us.
How does it make any sense to assert that an omnipotent being is "bound" by anything? Who is holding him accountable? NOBODY!

Look as all the promises that he makes in the scriptures. Could God be God if he didn't make good on all promises that he has made?
Why not? It seems rather obvious to me that God can be whatever he wants.

At the same time, does the fact that he has promised not to interfer in certain ways take away from the idea of him being all-powerful? No. That's the thing you must understand.
You're right, I don't understand, because it doesn't make any sense, and you've done nothing to make sense of it besides repeating the same incoherent assertion.

{snip}

The idea of free will itself is incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent being, because implicit in its omnipotence is infallible foreknowledge.

As I just explain, it is not incompatible.
You didn't "explain" anything. You simply asserted something incoherent.

You might as well assert that circles have corners, because it makes about as much sense as this assertion. If God wants something, he can have it. There is nothing stopping him.

Again, yes there is. Once he has given his word, he can not go back on it, no matter how powerful he is.
What's stopping him from going back on his word?

Oh, and what's with the {snip} stuff? Is that supposed to actually mean something?
Sorry, its an old forum habit. The snips denote where I have deleted parts of your previous post without addressing them individually and directly because doing so would be redundant or irrelevant in the greater context of the discussion.

 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: Geocentricity
To OP:

If you took apart a Boeing 747 and left it somewhere on the face of the earth, what are the chances that it will, by chance, become a functional 747 by all the "random" acts of nature?

Now think about the probability of life starting from unicellular organisms that eventually will become homo sapiens through "random" acts of evolution.

So how's life coming along thinking that every second of ours lives is random? Does it help you sleep at night?

Your fallacy is essentially the same as painting a target around and randomly fired arrow and then claiming that the arrow must've been aimed since it's sticking out of the bullseye.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: clickynext
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: Geocentricity
To OP:

If you took apart a Boeing 747 and left it somewhere on the face of the earth, what are the chances that it will, by chance, become a functional 747 by all the "random" acts of nature?

I hate the 747 analogy. A 747 is not alive. 747s do not reproduce. 747s do not have genetic codes to pass on.

What about the fact that random non-living chemicals do not reproduce, do not have genetic codes to pass on, yet are thought to have formed the first living organisms under the "right conditions" completely by chance?
Please elaborate on what you think the distinction is between "living" and "non-living" chemicals.
 

clickynext

Platinum Member
Dec 24, 2004
2,583
0
0
Originally posted by: sthaznpride17
To put so much faith in a simple book and an intangible thing is foolhardy. This is why we have so much trouble in the world today. Make no mistake it will drive humanity into extinction.

That's possible, but if you look at the societies, leaders, and figures who have been completely atheist going as far as rejecting religion, they don't fare any better, if not much, much worse. (ex. Marx, Hitler, Stalin, Mao)
 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: petrek
Before I attempt an explanation, lets be clear on something. I don't like to argue, discussion is good, argument is bad. For you to continue to be quick to respond, and be quick to tell me that I'm contradicting myself simply shows your not bothering to take the time to think through what I wrote, rather you are quick to repeat what you've been taught, or to reply with the first thought that comes to your mind.

So I ask you this, is God contradicting himself when He states

"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit." Proverbs 26:4-5 KJB

Dave

So, I guess you are just a liar, aren't you? Willing to make a commitment, but not willing to keep it.

Everyone can clearly see I didn't call you a fool, I asked you if God was contradicting himself when he made what appear to be contradictory statements. That was all.

Yes, I can tell by your lack of response that that is exactly what you meant. If you ever wonder why people don't accept your understanding of things, here are two shining example. You're not willing to keep your commitments and you're a liar. Neither seems very condusive to one who claims to be a "christian". But then, I guess by your interpretation, you're not supposed to talk to a fool. How convenient that you would attempt to use that to supercede you're lies.

Nice talk. Let me know if you ever grow up and are willing to talk again like a true adult.


2 Timothy 2:
[24] And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,
[25] In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
[26] And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.

1 Thessalonians 5
[14] Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient toward all men.
[15] See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men.

Romans 12
[1] I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.
[2] And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
[3] For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
[4] For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office:
[5] So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
[6] Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith;
[7] Or ministry, let us wait on our ministering: or he that teacheth, on teaching;
[8] Or he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness.
[9] Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.
[10] Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another;
[11] Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord;
[12] Rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation; continuing instant in prayer;
[13] Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality.
[14] Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.
[15] Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep.
[16] Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits.
[17] Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
[18] If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
[19] Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
[20] Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.
[21] Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Romans 2
[1] Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
[2] But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things.
[3] And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
[4] Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
[5] But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;
[6] Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
[7] To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
[8] But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,
[9] Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;
[10] But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
[11] For there is no respect of persons with God.
[12] For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
[13] (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
[14] For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
[15] Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another; )
[16] In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.
[17] Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God,
[18] And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law;
[19] And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness,
[20] An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.
[21] Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal?
[22] Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?
[23] Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?
[24] For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.
[25] For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.
[26] Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
[27] And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?
[28] For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
[29] But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Luke 6
[21] Blessed are ye that hunger now: for ye shall be filled. Blessed are ye that weep now: for ye shall laugh.
[22] Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.
[23] Rejoice ye in that day, and leap for joy: for, behold, your reward is great in heaven: for in the like manner did their fathers unto the prophets.
[24] But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
[25] Woe unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep.
[26] Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.
[27] But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
[28] Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.
[29] And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also.
[30] Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.
[31] And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.
[32] For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.
[33] And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.
[34] And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.
[35] But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.
[36] Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
[37] Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:
[38] Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again.

1 Corinthians 13
[1] Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
[2] And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.
[3] And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.
[4] Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up
[5] Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
[6] Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
[7] Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
[8] Charity never faileth...

Ephesians 4
[1] I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,
[2] With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love;
[3] Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.
[4] There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
[5] One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
[6] One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
[7] But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
[8] Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
[9] (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
[10] He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)
[11] And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
[12] For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
[13] Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
[14] That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
[15] But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
[16] From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.
[17] This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
[18] Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
[19] Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness.
[20] But ye have not so learned Christ;
[21] If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus:
[22] That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;
[23] And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
[24] And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.
[25] Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
[26] Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
[27] Neither give place to the devil.
[28] Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.
[29] Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.
[30] And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.
[31] Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
[32] And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.


It is clear to most everyone that your angry, the tone of your replies to me and others clearly shows that. And while I was taking some time to patiently think through and meditiate on the issue related to the 4 commitees, you took the time to call me a liar 3 times for not responding according to your wishes, according to your timetable.

The simple fact of the matter is that whether or not some committees (which may or may not have had Believers in their midst) immediately recognized what books were or were not Scripture, has no bearing on whether or not Christians apart from those committees recognized the books as authoritative, as the Word of God. Christians apart from those committees did recognize which books were the Word of God and which books were not, as Scripture clearly indicates. As such I have faith that KJ Bible I hold in my hands today is the complete Word of God from Genesis to Revelation, from beginning to end, pure and infallible. Just because it took 4 committees to get it right, doesn't change the fact that Believers knew all along which books contained the pure words of God. The fact that it took 4 committees to get it right only underscores the human element in the decision making process on those committees, but it does not take away the fact that Believers always had the pure words of the Living God in their possession, even if the didn't have them compiled together in the order in which they currently exist, and have existed since well before I did.

Dave
 

clickynext

Platinum Member
Dec 24, 2004
2,583
0
0
Originally posted by: Garth
Originally posted by: clickynext
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: Geocentricity
To OP:

If you took apart a Boeing 747 and left it somewhere on the face of the earth, what are the chances that it will, by chance, become a functional 747 by all the "random" acts of nature?

I hate the 747 analogy. A 747 is not alive. 747s do not reproduce. 747s do not have genetic codes to pass on.

What about the fact that random non-living chemicals do not reproduce, do not have genetic codes to pass on, yet are thought to have formed the first living organisms under the "right conditions" completely by chance?
Please elaborate on what you think the distinction is between "living" and "non-living" chemicals.

Living: a single celled organism. Non-living: anything simpler.

I'm not a biologist so I won't know the technicalities, if any such definitions exist.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: Garth

You do not get to say that you didn't want the baby to fall if you have the full opportunity and capacity to stop it.

Then I guess it's a question of whether you wanted the baby to fall, or whether you wanted the baby to walk. Depends on how you look at it. You can't have one without the other.

Another analogy.

You set up a device that will drop a massive boulder on a certain spot at a precise time. If you were to go stand under the boulder when it drops, you don't get to say you didn't want to be crushed. You had full opportunity and capacity to affect the outcome. If you didn't want to be crushed, all you had to do is stand somewhere else.

Saying that God wants all to be saved despite that some are not is like saying you do not want to be crushed by the boulder as you stand directly under it.

Guess I don't see that outcome in your analogy. If God wants all to be saved, then he's going to tell them to get out from under the boulder. If they don't listen to him, is that his fault? He promised to give them their freedom, so how can he still do that and yet force them to move?

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought we were talking about an omnipotent being.

Yes, we are talking about an omnipotent and all-powerful being. He had the foresight and the power to be able to make the commitment, as well as the power to fulfill these commitments. How does him living up to his promises take away from his abilities?

How does it make any sense to assert that an omnipotent being is "bound" by anything? Who is holding him accountable? NOBODY!

You assume nobody is, and I don't know if someone/something is or not. I have no idea. But I know that God would not be God if he didn't live up to his promises. If you assume a God that simply does as he wishes to whomever he wishes, then I understand your point of view. However, this is a God that I have no knowledge of, nor do I care to know anything about.

Why not? It seems rather obvious to me that God can be whatever he wants.

Seems rather obvious to me that God has chosen exactly what type of being he is going to be and at no point in time is he going to change that. So why would he?

You're right, I don't understand, because it doesn't make any sense, and you've done nothing to make sense of it besides repeating the same incoherent assertion.

Such is your opinion, and you're welcome to it. Makes perfect sense to me. As for the repition, if you'd pick up on it the first time, I wouldn't have to keep explaining it. Try to keep up. :)

You didn't "explain" anything. You simply asserted something incoherent.

No, you simply didn't want to accept what I stated. The concept is very, very simple. It doesn't say much for your intelligence if you are not able to understand this very simple principle.

I'll make it yet again as simple as possible. God has promises to give all people the freedom to choose for themselves what path they will take. If he therefore removes all obsticles and trials from peoples life, he is in violation of his first commitment all for something that is not even necessary. If you therefore wish to attribute every bad thing that happens to people to God because he made that promise of free will, then so be it. Doesn't make you correct, just means that's how you've chosen to interpret things. Funny though, the whole reason you have the ability to interpret it that way is because of free will.

What's stopping him from going back on his word?

Would it help if I said God was subject to someone else? Would that make you feel better? Does something/someone need to be there stopping him, or can you simply accept that he made a promise and he's not going to break it?

Sorry, its an old forum habit. The snips denote where I have deleted parts of your previous post without addressing them individually and directly because doing so would be redundant or irrelevant in the greater context of the discussion.

Gotcha. Thanks!
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Again, please don't quote the Bible to me. I'm rather familiar with it.

Originally posted by: petrek
It is clear to most everyone that your angry, the tone of your replies to me and others clearly shows that. And while I was taking some time to patiently think through and meditiate on the issue related to the 4 commitees, you took the time to call me a liar 3 times for not responding according to your wishes, according to your timetable.

Actually, I'm not angry at all. I will not lie that I have a problem with people who only ask questions but are never willing to answer any. You promised me answers and then didn't give them. If you wanted time, all you had to do was say so. You posted 6 comments during that time. I'm sure posting another to say you would answer them, but simply needed time, would have been detrimental to your meditation.

The simple fact of the matter is that whether or not some committees (which may or may not have had Believers in their midst) immediately recognized what books were or were not Scripture, has no bearing on whether or not Christians apart from those committees recognized the books as authoritative, as the Word of God. Christians apart from those committees did recognize which books were the Word of God and which books were not, as Scripture clearly indicates. As such I have faith that KJ Bible I hold in my hands today is the complete Word of God from Genesis to Revelation, from beginning to end, pure and infallible. Just because it took 4 committees to get it right, doesn't change the fact that Believers knew all along which books contained the pure words of God. The fact that it took 4 committees to get it right only underscores the human element in the decision making process on those committees, but it does not take away the fact that Believers always had the pure words of the Living God in their possession, even if the didn't have them compiled together in the order in which they currently exist, and have existed since well before I did.

As I have stated several time, I agree 100% that the Bible is the Word of God. However, even in the example you have stated, there were other writing that the Christians of that day studied that are not included in the current KJV of the Bible. Also, it is very evident in the Bible that the Jews in Israel were not the only people that God had dealing with. What of their writings? Surely they kept writings just as the early Israelites did. And what about the groups of followers that were separated over time, such as during the Tower of Babal and the captivity in Babylon? The Lost 10 tribes? Did not these people keep records as well? And if they did, would their records not serve to reinforce the teaching of the Bible. Note, not to replace, but to reinforce, the Bible.

Now the problem with the committees putting the Bible together still fails with your interpretation of Revelations. Now, on one side, there were several writings found at or around the time of the Muratorian Canon whose authorship could not be validated. However, there were also several writings that were excluded not because of attributing them to their author, but because of their contents. The early Christian church was fighting a huge battle with several groups, with Arianist being one of the largest. Many text were excluded simply because these people felt that they might support some of the Arianistic doctrines at that time.

So what I'm saying is, if you're interpretation of Revelations is correct, what right did those committees have to take away from and add to the Bible at will? And if they weren't inspired men, why are you accepting their edition of the Bible? Please help me understand this.

If I don't hear back from you for a while, I consider you to be thinking about it.

 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
Actually, I'm not angry at all. I will not lie that I have a problem with people who only ask questions but are never willing to answer any. You promised me answers and then didn't give them. If you wanted time, all you had to do was say so. You posted 6 comments during that time. I'm sure posting another to say you would answer them, but simply needed time, would have been detrimental to your meditation.

I don't know who your trying to fool, but the tone of your conversation speaks for yourself. Occasionally you do show signs of calm (like the above post, so you do have it in you to bridle your tongue), but mostly all I've seen from you is hostility.

As I have stated several time, I agree 100% that the Bible is the Word of God. However, even in the example you have stated, there were other writing that the Christians of that day studied that are not included in the current KJV of the Bible. Also, it is very evident in the Bible that the Jews in Israel were not the only people that God had dealing with. What of their writings? Surely they kept writings just as the early Israelites did. And what about the groups of followers that were separated over time, such as during the Tower of Babal and the captivity in Babylon? The Lost 10 tribes? Did not these people keep records as well? And if they did, would their records not serve to reinforce the teaching of the Bible. Note, not to replace, but to reinforce, the Bible.

Now the problem with the committees putting the Bible together still fails with your interpretation of Revelations. Now, on one side, there were several writings found at or around the time of the Muratorian Canon whose authorship could not be validated. However, there were also several writings that were excluded not because of attributing them to their author, but because of their contents. The early Christian church was fighting a huge battle with several groups, with Arianist being one of the largest. Many text were excluded simply because these people felt that they might support some of the Arianistic doctrines at that time.

So what I'm saying is, if you're interpretation of Revelations is correct, what right did those committees have to take away from and add to the Bible at will? And if they weren't inspired men, why are you accepting their edition of the Bible? Please help me understand this.

If I don't hear back from you for a while, I consider you to be thinking about it.

And my answer is simple. My faith is in Christ Jesus, and His ability to provide for me His complete and infallible Word. I don't have to worry about what may or may not have been written, what may or may not have been accepted, what tribe said who to what, I was not alive back then, and my faith isn't in what men may or may not have been thinking, in what mistakes men may or may not have been making. My faith is in Christ Jesus and His Word which He provided for me NOW, in this day and age in which I am alive, infallible, pure and complete.
My faith is rooted in the belief that the KJ Bible I hold in my hand is the complete revelation of God, and that it alone, in its current form in which it has existed for centuries, is the complete revelation from God to man. That it is all that is necessary for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness, that there is no other infallible Words of God that I may be missing, that it alone, the 66 books from Genesis to Revelation is all I need. That its current form, is exactly how God intended it to be when He began to breath His Words to Moses through to the last Epistle, complete, pure, infallible, as is, was, and always will be the perfect will of God.

You have stated you don't believe it is complete, and as such you will never understand my beliefs, because they are based on the foundation that the Bible is complete and infallible in it's current form, as it is, was, and always will be. You won't understand why the Koran is an obvious forgery until you understand that God always intended the Bible to be what it is today, that it was His plan from before the creation of the world for the Bible to exist in its current form from Genesis to Revelation. That Genesis always was the beginning of the Bible, even if men didn't recognize that fact at that time, but then how could they, they are not God.

So because my faith is rooted in Christ Jesus, the Word, the complete infallible Bible, we will never agree. You will never understand my beliefs, because in order to understand my beliefs, you must hold to the same truths regarding the foundation of the Christian faith, which is the infallible Word of God complete as it currently exists in my hands. If my faith wasn't rooted in the infallible Word of God, I could easily be led astray by every wind of doctrine, by teachers having itching ears, because my foundation would be in what may or may not be, and what will never be known. The past is gone, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

Dave

 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: petrek
I don't know who your trying to fool, but the tone of your conversation speaks for yourself. Occasionally you do show signs of calm (like the above post, so you do have it in you to bridle your tongue), but mostly all I've seen from you is hostility.

Such is your opinion, but as I stated, I am not angry, nor have I been. I know the wicked do take the truth to be hard. I wouldn't necessarily use the word wicked to describe you, as you seem like a good person, but who am I to change a word of scripture. ;)

You can laugh, that was a joke.

And my answer is simple. My faith is in Christ Jesus, and His ability to provide for me His complete and infallible Word. I don't have to worry about what may or may not have been written, what may or may not have been accepted, what tribe said who to what, I was not alive back then, and my faith isn't in what men may or may not have been thinking, in what mistakes men may or may not have been making. My faith is in Christ Jesus and His Word which He provided for me NOW, in this day and age in which I am alive, infallible, pure and complete.

I'm glad you feel that way. Now what if there was more he was trying to provide for you, but you were unwilling to accept it because it was not contained within the Bible? Not everyone the Lord spoke to lived in Israel after all.

My faith is rooted in the belief that the KJ Bible I hold in my hand is the complete revelation of God, and that it alone, in its current form in which it has existed for centuries, is the complete revelation from God to man. That it is all that is necessary for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness, that there is no other infallible Words of God that I may be missing, that it alone, the 66 books from Genesis to Revelation is all I need. That its current form, is exactly how God intended it to be when He began to breath His Words to Moses through to the last Epistle, complete, pure, infallible, as is, was, and always will be the perfect will of God.

You have stated you don't believe it is complete, and as such you will never understand my beliefs, because they are based on the foundation that the Bible is complete and infallible in it's current form, as it is, was, and always will be. You won't understand why the Koran is an obvious forgery until you understand that God always intended the Bible to be what it is today, that it was His plan from before the creation of the world for the Bible to exist in its current form from Genesis to Revelation. That Genesis always was the beginning of the Bible, even if men didn't recognize that fact at that time, but then how could they, they are not God.

So because my faith is rooted in Christ Jesus, the Word, the complete infallible Bible, we will never agree. You will never understand my beliefs, because in order to understand my beliefs, you must hold to the same truths regarding the foundation of the Christian faith, which is the infallible Word of God complete as it currently exists in my hands. If my faith wasn't rooted in the infallible Word of God, I could easily be led astray by every wind of doctrine, by teachers having itching ears, because my foundation would be in what may or may not be, and what will never be known. The past is gone, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

While I admire your dedication, you're right. We most likely will never see eye to eye. The primary reason is that I see no right or ability that man has to determine when God has said enough and when he hasn't. You believe the Bible to be all that there is. I, on the other hand, believe there to be more. I believe in modern-day prophets and that God continues even today to lead his church as he did in times of old. I believe God had dealings with others, just as he did with those in the Bible, and that these writings and teaching work together with the Bible to provide us with an even greater understanding of God. After all, if you love the Bible so much, why would you turn down additional scripture that also testify of God and his Son.

I hope one day you'll be able to see that knew the problems that would come about when the Bible was created, that even though it contained his word, men would alter it and corrupt its teachings because of "itching ears". Knowing this, he provided additional scripture to reaffirm the truthfulness of the first and to work together in testifying of his gospel. There is a lot of understanding you are missing out on. I sincerely hope one day you will change your mind.
 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
I'm glad you feel that way. Now what if there was more he was trying to provide for you, but you were unwilling to accept it because it was not contained within the Bible? Not everyone the Lord spoke to lived in Israel after all.

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: petrek
I'm glad you feel that way. Now what if there was more he was trying to provide for you, but you were unwilling to accept it because it was not contained within the Bible? Not everyone the Lord spoke to lived in Israel after all.

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

So? Try Psalms 85:11, Isaiah 29, Ezek 37:15-20, John 10:16. My viewpoint is in contradiction of none of these verses, including the ones you listed. You're viewpoint is.
 

getbush

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2001
1,771
0
0
So I haven't read any of this thread but I just want to remind you guys that the bible was written by man, who created god in his image. And then some people got together and voted on which writings they thought they could get romans to believe, and that became the WORD bah bah baahhhhh kthxbye.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
The Bible was written by men to subjugate other men. It's a blatant power grab hidden by parables and wrapped in the cloak of faith. Men have done nothing but tarnish the true message of God in their zeal to grab more power.

God created us, he gave us the power to do what we wish. We have the tools at our disposal. However, I do not believe that he alone controls our destiny, he only has allowed us to choose our own and given us the tools to select what we want to do. God gave my my intelligence, so indeed he has controlled my life. However, he doesn't manipulate how I use that tool. Can I attribute my success to him? Yes, I can, but only in the base sense.

I agree, those who attribute random acts to God are trying to deal with the reality that randomness happens. Life is nothing but probability and the will to overcome some probabilities.

To those who use some stupid 747 analogy. A 747 cannot alter it's own destiny, it is something that doesn't have the ability to change itself, or be changed by random acts (other than crashes or human manipulation). It cannot evolve, as living and changing organisms have proven they can.

The Earth is older than 6,000 years. The Universe is billions of years old. It's egocentric buffoonery to think that we are the *only* creation over billions of years and that we are somehow the only thing in the universe that God has created or manipulates.

Essentially, most religions provide a way for people to feel better about their own insignificance in the universe. That isn't to say God doesn't exist (I firmly believe he does), but it does highlight the fact that people just can't get over the fact that, in the large scheme of things, they mean nothing. Thus, they clamor for some anchor point, provided by faith.

Other people have decided to use and abuse that anchor point, wrestling for more control and manipulation. It's as simple as that.
 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
While I admire your dedication, you're right. We most likely will never see eye to eye. The primary reason is that I see no right or ability that man has to determine when God has said enough and when he hasn't. You believe the Bible to be all that there is. I, on the other hand, believe there to be more. I believe in modern-day prophets and that God continues even today to lead his church as he did in times of old. I believe God had dealings with others, just as he did with those in the Bible, and that these writings and teaching work together with the Bible to provide us with an even greater understanding of God. After all, if you love the Bible so much, why would you turn down additional scripture that also testify of God and his Son.

I hope one day you'll be able to see that knew the problems that would come about when the Bible was created, that even though it contained his word, men would alter it and corrupt its teachings because of "itching ears". Knowing this, he provided additional scripture to reaffirm the truthfulness of the first and to work together in testifying of his gospel. There is a lot of understanding you are missing out on. I sincerely hope one day you will change your mind.

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Genesis describes the very beginning, Revelation describes the very end. What God has said confirms there are no more revelations from Him which are needed, or can be trusted.
Pss.12
[6] The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
[7] Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.

2Tim.3
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

I'm a biblical Christian, what extra biblical writings do your faith add to the Bible?

Dave
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: petrek

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Did you not read it the first time? These verses showed nothing the first time you posted them. Why would you think that had changed?

Genesis describes the very beginning, Revelation describes the very end. What God has said confirms there are no more revelations from Him which are needed, or can be trusted.

No, what you think he meant is that. What he actually said is very different. I notice you still haven't looked at the verse I asked to you.

Pss.12
[6] The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
[7] Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.

2Tim.3
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Exactly. So, if other scripture has been given, there is the reason.

Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

What is it with you? Are you trying to convince yourself or is there some other reason you have quoted this a third time?

In hopes that it will stop, here an explanation for your verses. Matt. 24 is in reference to the second coming, which I don't recall even talking about. The verses in Mark and Luke are the same. Your verses in Galatian refer to a different Gospel, not the Bible. A gospel is a collection of teachings, which in the case of the Bible is the teachings of Christ. Therefore, additional scripture would not contradict this verse unless such teachings were contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ and where therefore a different Gospel.

Now, hopefully you can quit quoting those scriptures.

As for the additional scriptures, I personally use the Book of Mormon as an additional testament of Jesus Christ. Not to replace the Bible, but to stand as a second witness, with the Bible, of Jesus Christ.

 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
So? Try Psalms 85:11, Isaiah 29, Ezek 37:15-20, John 10:16. My viewpoint is in contradiction of none of these verses, including the ones you listed. You're viewpoint is.
My belief is that I am not to believe any other Gospel, that the Bible is a finished book which details the beginning (Genesis) to the end (Revelation), that the Bible is a finished book able to make the man of God perfect, that it is Lord's responsibility to preserve His words.

Dave
 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt.24
[23] Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
[24] For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Mark.13
[21] And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

Luke.21
[8] And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.

Gal.1
[6] I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
[7] Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
[8] But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
[9] As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



What is it with you? Are you trying to convince yourself or is there some other reason you have quoted this a third time?

In hopes that it will stop, here an explanation for your verses. Matt. 24 is in reference to the second coming, which I don't recall even talking about. The verses in Mark and Luke are the same. Your verses in Galatian refer to a different Gospel, not the Bible. A gospel is a collection of teachings, which in the case of the Bible is the teachings of Christ. Therefore, additional scripture would not contradict this verse unless such teachings were contrary to the teachings of Jesus Christ and where therefore a different Gospel.

Now, hopefully you can quit quoting those scriptures.

As for the additional scriptures, I personally use the Book of Mormon as an additional testament of Jesus Christ. Not to replace the Bible, but to stand as a second witness, with the Bible, of Jesus Christ.

The book of Mormon clearly teaches another Gospel other than the Gospel which was preached, which is of course why I keep pointing those verses which clearly teach us NOT to accept any other Gospel period.

Dave
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: petrek
So? Try Psalms 85:11, Isaiah 29, Ezek 37:15-20, John 10:16. My viewpoint is in contradiction of none of these verses, including the ones you listed. You're viewpoint is.
My belief is that I am not to believe any other Gospel, that the Bible is a finished book which details the beginning (Genesis) to the end (Revelation), that the Bible is a finished book able to make the man of God perfect, that it is Lord's responsibility to preserve His words.

Dave

What about all the books that were not put in the Bible because church leaders didn't like their message? The Apocalypse of Peter, The Book of Jubilee, The Book of Adam and Eve, and the Gospel of Nicodemus, to name a few.

The expanded Adam and Eve texts in The Book of Adam and Eve are an interesting read, goes into a lot more depth than the Bible does.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: petrek
So? Try Psalms 85:11, Isaiah 29, Ezek 37:15-20, John 10:16. My viewpoint is in contradiction of none of these verses, including the ones you listed. You're viewpoint is.
My belief is that I am not to believe any other Gospel, that the Bible is a finished book which details the beginning (Genesis) to the end (Revelation), that the Bible is a finished book able to make the man of God perfect, that it is Lord's responsibility to preserve His words.

Dave

Wow, what a cop-out. None of those beliefs infringe on the idea of additional scripture. You claim to believe the Bible, but when it clearly proves you wrong, you just resort back to some other base belief. God offers you more of his word and you simply turn your nose up at him and say "I have all I need". There is a great verse that describes this exact attitude.

2nd Nephi:29 (Book of Mormon, written around 550bc)
1 But behold, there shall be many?at that day when I shall proceed to do a marvelous work among them, that I may remember my covenants which I have made unto the children of men, that I may set my hand again the second time to recover my people, which are of the house of Israel;
2 And also, that I may remember the promises which I have made unto thee, Nephi, and also unto thy father, that I would remember your seed; and that the words of your seed should proceed forth out of my mouth unto your seed; and my words shall hiss forth unto the ends of the earth, for a standard unto my people, which are of the house of Israel;
3 And because my words shall hiss forth?many of the Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible, and there cannot be any more Bible.
4 But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing forth salvation unto the Gentiles?
5 O ye Gentiles, have ye remembered the Jews, mine ancient covenant people? Nay; but ye have cursed them, and have hated them, and have not sought to recover them. But behold, I will return all these things upon your own heads; for I the Lord have not forgotten my people.
6 Thou fool, that shall say: A Bible, we have got a Bible, and we need no more Bible. Have ye obtained a Bible save it were by the Jews?
7 Know ye not that there are more nations than one? Know ye not that I, the Lord your God, have created all men, and that I remember those who are upon the isles of the sea; and that I rule in the heavens above and in the earth beneath; and I bring forth my word unto the children of men, yea, even upon all the nations of the earth?
8 Wherefore murmur ye, because that ye shall receive more of my word? Know ye not that the testimony of two nations is a witness unto you that I am God, that I remember one nation like unto another? Wherefore, I speak the same words unto one nation like unto another. And when the two nations shall run together the testimony of the two nations shall run together also.
9 And I do this that I may prove unto many that I am the same yesterday, today, and forever; and that I speak forth my words according to mine own pleasure. And because that I have spoken one word ye need not suppose that I cannot speak another; for my work is not yet finished; neither shall it be until the end of man, neither from that time henceforth and forever.
10 Wherefore, because that ye have a Bible ye need not suppose that it contains all my words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused more to be written.
11 For I command all men, both in the east and in the west, and in the north, and in the south, and in the islands of the sea, that they shall write the words which I speak unto them; for out of the books which shall be written I will judge the world, every man according to their works, according to that which is written.
12 For behold, I shall speak unto the Jews and they shall bwrite it; and I shall also speak unto the Nephites and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto the other tribes of the house of Israel, which I have led away, and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto all nations of the earth and they shall write it.

So much is written and you would just throw it away because you feel the Bible is all you need. I truly feel pitty for you. There is not lack of devotion to God on you part, that much is evident. As wonderful as the Bible is, I would think people like you would welcome more of his word.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: petrek

The book of Mormon clearly teaches another Gospel other than the Gospel which was preached, which is of course why I keep pointing those verses which clearly teach us NOT to accept any other Gospel period.

It clearly doesn't, and the fact that you would think so means either one of two things. You are only repeating what you have heard, or you don't understand the Gospel that is taught in the Bible. If you'd care to list something the Book of Mormon preaches that is contrary to the Bible, please do so.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Originally posted by: petrek
So? Try Psalms 85:11, Isaiah 29, Ezek 37:15-20, John 10:16. My viewpoint is in contradiction of none of these verses, including the ones you listed. You're viewpoint is.
My belief is that I am not to believe any other Gospel, that the Bible is a finished book which details the beginning (Genesis) to the end (Revelation), that the Bible is a finished book able to make the man of God perfect, that it is Lord's responsibility to preserve His words.

Dave

What about all the books that were not put in the Bible because church leaders didn't like their message? The Apocalypse of Peter, The Book of Jubilee, The Book of Adam and Eve, and the Gospel of Nicodemus, to name a few.

The expanded Adam and Eve texts in The Book of Adam and Eve are an interesting read, goes into a lot more depth than the Bible does.

I've already asked that question because that's the same thing I was wondering. I don't see why people simply accept that the current version is all there is when is was based completely off the opinions of a group of people.