Originally posted by: chambersc
The question is if "anti-gay protestors" would tolerate a "gay" to be who they are or not. If the answer is no, they don't believe that gays should be the way they are, then they are intolerant by definition.Originally posted by: mchammer
Originally posted by: chambersc
Originally posted by: dxkj
I hate how Heathens always think these 1 in 1,000,000 things that happen are just random, and not being directed by some greater power. Sure there is a chance that everything will line up and these things will happen, but for how often they happen, it is obviously a miracle most of the time.
......riiiiighhhtttt
Originally posted by: mchammer
Way to tolerate others beleifs :thumbsup:
Do you know what tolerance is? Tolerance is respecting the right that they can say what they want. Qualifying the beliefs isn't beling intolerant it just means that one has a negative opinion of those specific beliefs. Think of tolerance as an abstract concept and specific beliefs as being able to be criticized.
So you don't think anti-gay protesters are intolerant then?
Isn't that statement intolerant by definition? If it's intolerant for them to think being gay isn't ok, isn't it also intolerant for you to think that what they believe is not ok?