Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Of course his educated point of view pisses you perverts off. Do any of you nitwits have a psychology show or even a psyhcology degree? :roll:
I've been saying all along that porn is NOT normal and shouldn't be accepted behavior. People who post frequently on the Internet are people who spend a lot of time there and probably get their porn fix on it too, so the opinions expressed on forums like this are totally skewed. Porn is NOT healthy....it does the same damage mentally as smoking does physically and should be similarly viewed as reprobate behavior.
You "hate" the guy because he expresses an opinion opposite to your own? Yeah, that's rational. Maybe you're a little TOO addicted...er...attached to your porn.
A couple of things.
First, having a show on television says absolutely nothing about a person's credentials. The only thing having a television show says about a person is that they are sufficiently popular within a specific subset of the population that a network can sell commercials during that person's show. As "Dr." Laura proved, a person need not have any qualifications for the persona that he presents on his show.
Second, please post links to some objective and peer-reviewed journals where one can find studies to back up your assertions. Without any sort of bibliography provided from you, we have no rational option other than to assume that you're pulling everything you say out of thin air.
My inclination would be that the unhealthiness of pornography is directly linked to the severity of said pornography. I would agree that anything aside from so-called "softcore" pornography (i.e. nudes without any vulgar posing) is likely to be at least slightly degenerate and in especially vulgar forms is clearly severely degenerate. However, it would take a good deal of studies to convince me that artistic softcore pornography is a degenerate behaviour.
ZV