What percentage of the bill is infrastructure what what percentage is designed for the government to grow tremendously? I'm sure gay mayor Pete is a total infrastructure expert despite being a lousy mayor of South Bend. But let's be honest, infrastructure will only be used to push more establishment rule over the population.
ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 33,349
- 16,727
- 136
I couldn’t tell you but I can say that with 100% certainty that 0% of the bill is designed to overturn a valid election which makes your point completely fucking retarded. Since you seem to be a giant fucking moron, I don’t think you should be talking about anyone’s qualifications for anything.
Btw, you giant fucking moron, it’s the will of the people who are pushing for these sort of things, hence the reason the bill was passed in the first place by politicians the people elected.
Damn, that's not very inclusive and diverse of you. And not very tolerant at all. You need some inclusivity classes, buddy.
ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 33,349
- 16,727
- 136
Sorry snowflake, this isn’t a safe space for idiots who want to spew bull shit.
Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 35,406
- 9,601
- 136
I did not say make him a Saint, but Mike Pence and other Republicans who stand up to crazy should at least receive credit where credit is due. And encouraged to do it more.
If only because we need to focus our attention on the Trumps and the crazies.
ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 33,349
- 16,727
- 136
I’d be happy if you took any classes. Your intellectual laziness is a disease that’s spreading.
- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,791
- 10,428
- 147
Fixing bridges to make them safe is your idea of government overreach?
- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,791
- 10,428
- 147
You seem disturbingly obsessed with what Pete Buttigieg does with his penis. Lonely? Not getting any? Or are you just a bigot?
I don't think @raildogg realizes the dire state of bridges, tunnels, highways, and rails in the United States. The situation only gets worsen with people glued to their phones like raildogg don't realize what's happening around them, and things like this happen.Fixing bridges to make them safe is your idea of government overreach?
*Do the ones bellow with sound on*
There even is a news report on the stupidity and the damages done. Then there are those that say the federal government is not responsible and should not pay.
Then the rail road industry has to deal with the road and rail planning stupidity sometimes. Not only you now have an angry truck driver, but angry Amtrack passengers as well.
Then the rail road industry has to deal with the road and rail planning stupidity sometimes. Not only you now have an angry truck driver, but angry Amtrack passengers as well.
I know I might be sounding dumb as if I am surprised or something, but I already know about this stuff already. it's just that I am trying to explain the importance of government funding for transportation, to raildogg who is under the age of 12 probably.
Sometimes such incidents are even more dangerous than the one above.
That is not the only such incident with rails. These rail incidents are not always die to traffic lights or a stuck truck. Sometimes its the driver that is just plain stupid to think they can beat the damn train.
So @raildogg , I hope you now understand that it's not just about bridges being fine or what not, but for repairs as well, when the federal government spends on transportation infrastructure.
Sometimes such incidents are even more dangerous than the one above.
HomerJS
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2002
- 38,660
- 31,664
- 136
That infrastructure gave us things like the Hoover Dam and the interstate highway system which have paid for themselves many times over.
Just in case you were remaining intentionally ignorant of those kinds of things.
Fenixgoon
Lifer
- Jun 30, 2003
- 33,055
- 12,448
- 136
McConnell did one good thing, but I'm not sure that comes anywhere close to making up for his fuckery.
I imagine the RNC will blink before Mitch does. He's way too good at the game.
Fenixgoon
Lifer
- Jun 30, 2003
- 33,055
- 12,448
- 136
let's suppose mitch ditches himself...would his seat even have a chance to go to Dems? McGrath was down ~20pts vs. Mitch.
trenchfoot
Lifer
- Aug 5, 2000
- 15,622
- 8,149
- 136
McConnell had already said the same thing about the Jan. 6 riot being an insurrection a few weeks after it happened. It would have looked bad for him to contradict himself, although it sure hasn't stopped him from reversing himself many times before. It seems that McConnell has decided that Trump needs to be gone from the party, the sooner the better, seeing as if Trump is in effect exploiting the party for his own purposes that will increasingly cause all manner of intra-party turmoil the closer it gets to 2024.
There's also the idea that Trump will surely usurp McConnell's agenda toward his vision of the party's future via Trump's vision of installing himself as Dictator-in-Chief, resulting in McConnell or any other high ranking Repubs playing a much less influential role in how and where the flow of cash is pilfered from the nation's treasury.
edit - added word "from"
There's also the idea that Trump will surely usurp McConnell's agenda toward his vision of the party's future via Trump's vision of installing himself as Dictator-in-Chief, resulting in McConnell or any other high ranking Repubs playing a much less influential role in how and where the flow of cash is pilfered from the nation's treasury.
edit - added word "from"
Last edited:
cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 25,661
- 15,160
- 136
McConnell did say that right after the 6th and then he backpedalled the fuck right back into party line - until now. So this is Mitch flipping his flip flopping.
cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 25,661
- 15,160
- 136
hal2kilo
Lifer
- Feb 24, 2009
- 25,673
- 12,006
- 136
Most of them secretly wish the DOJ would do their job and indict the asshole so they don't have to deal with his cult anymore.
Yup, as the evidence piles up all this is going to come down to one person, Merrick Garland and the DOJ. Judging by how long it's taking to do anything regarding the Mark Meadows situation one has to wonder if he has the balls to indite that orange bag of shit down the road.
trenchfoot
Lifer
- Aug 5, 2000
- 15,622
- 8,149
- 136
So the RNC is backtracking on the "legitimate political discourse" comment they made in reference to the Jan.6 insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol by saying that they were referring to others who did not actively participate in the attack, which leaves the question of just what the RNC considers those rioters who actively participated in the break-in to be. It seems by their making a distinction between the active and non-active participants the RNC has unwittingly admitted that those who directly participated in the violence are insurrectionists after all.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 21K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter