• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I got the Holy Ghost today!!!!!

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
For those who seem to just be posting here, w/o having read the entire thread, here's my original post in this thread.

Alright, let's check out some verses on speaking in tongues:
Ok, let's look at the original Pentecost:

Acts 2:1 When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. 2Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. 4All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.
5Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 7Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? 8Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language? 9Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11(both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" 12Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?"
13Some, however, made fun of them and said, "They have had too much wine."


The first question I ask is, what was the reason that these apostles all of a sudden could speak many languages, by miraculous means? It was so that they could spread the word of God to other nations. If I could suddenly speak Swahili with out having studied it, I would be speaking in tongues as the apostles did. There is no mention in the bible that I could find of any apostles babbling off in some unintelagiable language that was not an actual earthly language. Many Religions claim to transfer ppl to some higher level of communications with a deity, nature or whatever. The idea of suddenly being "overcome" by the spirit and speaking in some quacked language doesn't sound like something a Christ that was a true God would cause, if every other religion can do the same thing. Would it feel any less real to those experiencing i? No, I believe it is just something that humans are capable of doing to themselves if they are short on oxygen. Think about it, hyperventalate long enough from either chanting, singing praise and worship music, or breathing in a brown paper bag and you will say all sorts of things that will feel inspired.

Summary: The apostles and the early believers could speak in tongues (other languages) so they could spread the gospel to ppl groups that did not speak their language.


1 Corinthians 14:

1Follow the way of love and eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy. 2For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. Indeed, no one understands him; he utters mysteries with his spirit. 3But everyone who prophesies speaks to men for their strengthening, encouragement and comfort. 4He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church. 5I would like every one of you to speak in tongues,[3] but I would rather have you prophesy. He who prophesies is greater than one who speaks in tongues,[4] unless he interprets, so that the church may be edified.
6Now, brothers, if I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction? 7Even in the case of lifeless things that make sounds, such as the flute or harp, how will anyone know what tune is being played unless there is a distinction in the notes? 8Again, if the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? 9So it is with you. Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air. 10Undoubtedly there are all sorts of languages in the world, yet none of them is without meaning. 11If then I do not grasp the meaning of what someone is saying, I am a foreigner to the speaker, and he is a foreigner to me. 12So it is with you. Since you are eager to have spiritual gifts, try to excel in gifts that build up the church.
13For this reason anyone who speaks in a tongue should pray that he may interpret what he says. 14For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful. 15So what shall I do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will also pray with my mind; I will sing with my spirit, but I will also sing with my mind. 16If you are praising God with your spirit, how can one who finds himself among those who do not understand say "Amen" to your thanksgiving, since he does not know what you are saying? 17You may be giving thanks well enough, but the other man is not edified.
18I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. 19But in the church I would rather speak five intelligible words to instruct others than ten thousand words in a tongue.
20Brothers, stop thinking like children. In regard to evil be infants, but in your thinking be adults. 21In the Law it is written:
"Through men of strange tongues
and through the lips of foreigners
I will speak to this people,
but even then they will not listen to me," says the Lord.
22Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers. 23So if the whole church comes together and everyone speaks in tongues, and some who do not understand or some unbelievers come in, will they not say that you are out of your mind? 24But if an unbeliever or someone who does not understand comes in while everybody is prophesying, he will be convinced by all that he is a sinner and will be judged by all, 25and the secrets of his heart will be laid bare. So he will fall down and worship God, exclaiming, "God is really among you!"

26What then shall we say, brothers? When you come together, everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church. 27If anyone speaks in a tongue, two--or at the most three--should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. 28If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God.
29Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said. 30And if a revelation comes to someone who is sitting down, the first speaker should stop. 31For you can all prophesy in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged. 32The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets. 33For God is not a God of disorder but of peace.
34As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. 35If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
36Did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people it has reached? 37If anybody thinks he is a prophet or spiritually gifted, let him acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord's command. 38If he ignores this, he himself will be ignored.
39Therefore, my brothers, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues. 40But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.


I like this last passage, especially the Rules for orderly worship found in verses 27-28. I would ask you how many people were speaking in "tongues" at the service you were at? 3, 4, 5, 20? Was there someone interpretting for each of them? If not, the action had no place in the church, assuming that this passage speaks of "tongues" as something other than another earthly language, for the sake of evangelism, but rather speaks of being able to babel in a deistic language.

Finally, what is your focus as a Christian? True, the bible says that believers are to search out the "Greater gifts", but to what point? To worship God, or to edify yourself? How about to reach "the lost" (even though I don't like that term). The problem I have with the entire apostolic movement, and to a vast extent modern Christianity is that it is very self-serving. It has ceased being about "What can I do for God" and changed into "What can God do for me?"

I'm reminded of one further passage:

1 Samuel 15
21 The soldiers took sheep and cattle from the plunder, the best of what was devoted to God, in order to sacrifice them to the LORD your God at Gilgal."
22 But Samuel replied:

"Does the LORD delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices
as much as in obeying the voice of the LORD ?
To obey is better than sacrifice,
and to heed is better than the fat of rams.
23 For rebellion is like the sin of divination,
and arrogance like the evil of idolatry.
Because you have rejected the word of the LORD ,
he has rejected you as king."


Reading that Passage, I am reminded that God's first priority is for us to obey him. All that we do in worship, in outreach, in prayer is quite secondary to living a life of obediance to him. God doesn't require that we have to be 100% perfect to be a christian, however he does require that we try. Speaking in tongues is completely fruitless if we don't live a life of obediance between Sundays.

Anyway, that's my thoughts on this topic, I hope it made some sense.

But with the apostles everyone could understand them.
 
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.

No you are wrong. Everyone heard the apostles in their own native language.
 
Originally posted by: stnicralisk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.

No you are wrong. Everyone heard the apostles in their own native language.

ROFLMAO omg now there is a true christian argument there. No support, ignores what the quoted scripture says. I love "Christians" like this. They make me feel good about my faith.
 
5Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 7Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? 8Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language? 9Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11(both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" 12Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?"

Could this passage not mean that there were say 10 different languages represented by the "God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven" and each of them heard at least one other apostle speaking their language? not necessarily that every apostle was understood by every visitor. That would be my interpretation of it anyway.
 
7Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? 8Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language?
 
Originally posted by: Kenazo
5Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 7Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? 8Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language? 9Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11(both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" 12Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?"

Could this passage not mean that there were say 10 different languages represented by the "God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven" and each of them heard at least one other apostle speaking their language? not necessarily that every apostle was understood by every visitor. That would be my interpretation of it anyway.


That is how i read it. pretty black and white if you ask me.
 
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
And I wouldn't call it disbelief. Its open-mindedness.

Something you people should try.

I didn't say there is no God. I don't know and neither do you. I'm openminded to stray from what society teaches us is correct.

Ive witnessed God. Ive seen the eye of God several times in my life. Ive heard his angels speak to me. You dont know and you dont care. When I pray, He hears me. His angles protect me. There are good and bad angels. Family members who are in Heaven and others that do satans bidding. There is a war going on everyday between good and evil. Recognize.

Wow just um wow. Your dementia is worsening. Living the path of the bible I dont understand why people think god would ever help them. In the bible he almost never helps anyone till they are almost dead. Why do people think that they are going to get the same miracles when they are asking for help. You have to face it. Either way whether there is a god or not he is not going to help you because #1 it makes no sense #2 he may not exist. Your religeon is faulty as it controdicts itself in so many ways its unbearable to be around you people any more. You claim to hear voices and sh!t well guess what. THATS BECAUSE YOU HAVE FVCKING LOST IT! Go seek professional help. Therapy, pills, whatever just do it. And stop being such tools and look at the things you are doing.

-Xionide
 
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Kenazo
He's big into the whole spiritual warfare thing, what you were talking about sounds a lot like the things he teaches, or at least the slant he puts on it.

Ill tell you what happened, but first a little background: I work in a quite office - almost library quiet. I was visiting friends and relatives Ive havent seen in a long time and had never visited before back in 2002. Then later I would get an update and what people said or did after I was gone the same day, the following day, etc. when I would overhear a conversation happening in a cubicle next to me. The voices would be the same - people I worked with for years - but the conversation would focus specifically on what I had done the previous evening, what people had said about me after I left, and what they were planning (if they were) that would involve me. Other times I would be listening to an AM talk station and I would get all sorts of opinions and advice about life. I asked a question and got an answer. Same thing with (and especially) baseball games on TV (angels in the outfield? lol). Now I dont know why this was happening and stopped and late 2002. I was also having propethic dreams, including the apocolypse (the moon, blood red, a closing circle, Chinese letters in that circle, etc). My mother has being going to same Catholic church for almost 50 years and on Wednesdays prays the rosary with a group of people and the Father. They pray for miracles and everything else. If you compelete a Novena or other prayers for years, God will (may) grant an indulgence according to belief. I know my mother has been praying for the entire family. When I told about everything that was happening it really didnt surprise her. But I couldnt believe the awesome display of Gods power. There is so much more to say, but I will leave it at this, for now.

I think you need to talk to a psychiatrist.

"Son did you know any priests at a young age? Umm hmm. And did they attempt to put gods "spirit" in you?"

-Xionide
 
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: stnicralisk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.

No you are wrong. Everyone heard the apostles in their own native language.

ROFLMAO omg now there is a true christian argument there. No support, ignores what the quoted scripture says. I love "Christians" like this. They make me feel good about my faith.

Yeah - you sure sound like a model Christian :roll:

I've read that passage, and I think it's rather clear that the crowd heard them in each of their own native tongues.
 
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: Kenazo
He's big into the whole spiritual warfare thing, what you were talking about sounds a lot like the things he teaches, or at least the slant he puts on it.

Ill tell you what happened, but first a little background: I work in a quite office - almost library quiet. I was visiting friends and relatives Ive havent seen in a long time and had never visited before back in 2002. Then later I would get an update and what people said or did after I was gone the same day, the following day, etc. when I would overhear a conversation happening in a cubicle next to me. The voices would be the same - people I worked with for years - but the conversation would focus specifically on what I had done the previous evening, what people had said about me after I left, and what they were planning (if they were) that would involve me. Other times I would be listening to an AM talk station and I would get all sorts of opinions and advice about life. I asked a question and got an answer. Same thing with (and especially) baseball games on TV (angels in the outfield? lol). Now I dont know why this was happening and stopped and late 2002. I was also having propethic dreams, including the apocolypse (the moon, blood red, a closing circle, Chinese letters in that circle, etc). My mother has being going to same Catholic church for almost 50 years and on Wednesdays prays the rosary with a group of people and the Father. They pray for miracles and everything else. If you compelete a Novena or other prayers for years, God will (may) grant an indulgence according to belief. I know my mother has been praying for the entire family. When I told about everything that was happening it really didnt surprise her. But I couldnt believe the awesome display of Gods power. There is so much more to say, but I will leave it at this, for now.

I think you need to talk to a psychiatrist.

:roll::|

I'm not trying to be funny. I'm serious. If he's hearing voices, thats not good.

You think you just know fvcking everything, don't you. :|

I agree, he def needs to see a shrink.

-Xionide
 
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: stnicralisk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.

No you are wrong. Everyone heard the apostles in their own native language.

ROFLMAO omg now there is a true christian argument there. No support, ignores what the quoted scripture says. I love "Christians" like this. They make me feel good about my faith.

Reminds me of a recent interview I heard on NPR re:a couple of books about the early church and the formation of the Bible:

Scholar Bart Ehrman, 'Lost Christianities'
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=3250048
July 9, 2004 · Ehrman is the Bowman and Gordon Gray professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina. His newest book is Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. It chronicles the period before Christianity as we know it came to be, when people with conflicting ideas about the religion were fighting for prominence in the second and third centuries. Ehrman also edited a collection of the early non-canonical texts from the first centuries after Christ called Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament.

Elaine Pagels, 'The Secret Gospel of Thomas'
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=3250046
July 9, 2004 · Her latest book, Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas, is just out in paperback. It's about a religious text that is little known -- the secret Gospel of Thomas, rediscovered in Egypt in 1945. She will explain why it was suppressed by the church and kept out of the canon. Pagels has been called one of the world's most important writers and thinkers on religion and history. She won the National Book Award for her book, The Gnostic Gospels. Pagels is a professor at Princeton University.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: stnicralisk
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: stnicralisk


But with the apostles everyone could understand them.

Well, not everyone, just the ppl that understood that language, since it is my belief that "speaking in tongues" as the apostles did it, is just speaking in a human language that you never learnt. Thus, if I all of a sudden could speak Swahili, chances are very few ppl around here could understand me, but if I went to whatever african country it is where that is the normal language, they would be able to understand me.

No you are wrong. Everyone heard the apostles in their own native language.

ROFLMAO omg now there is a true christian argument there. No support, ignores what the quoted scripture says. I love "Christians" like this. They make me feel good about my faith.

Reminds me of a recent interview I heard on NPR re:a couple of books about the early church and the formation of the Bible:

Scholar Bart Ehrman, 'Lost Christianities'
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=3250048
July 9, 2004 · Ehrman is the Bowman and Gordon Gray professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina. His newest book is Lost Christianities: The Battle for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. It chronicles the period before Christianity as we know it came to be, when people with conflicting ideas about the religion were fighting for prominence in the second and third centuries. Ehrman also edited a collection of the early non-canonical texts from the first centuries after Christ called Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament.

Elaine Pagels, 'The Secret Gospel of Thomas'
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=3250046
July 9, 2004 · Her latest book, Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas, is just out in paperback. It's about a religious text that is little known -- the secret Gospel of Thomas, rediscovered in Egypt in 1945. She will explain why it was suppressed by the church and kept out of the canon. Pagels has been called one of the world's most important writers and thinkers on religion and history. She won the National Book Award for her book, The Gnostic Gospels. Pagels is a professor at Princeton University.

Seems like some interesting reads
 
Oh, very much so!

I have about a dozen books yet to read and then I'll pick up those. Ehrman's seems the most intriguing. Listening to him explain how the Bible was pieced together and that the Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John but, rather, attributed to them makes one realize the Bible was written by men. It was not "the word of God". It was men's interpretations of events and teachings.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Oh, very much so!

I have about a dozen books yet to read and then I'll pick up those. Ehrman's seems the most intriguing. Listening to him explain how the Bible was pieced together and that the Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John but, rather, attributed to them makes one realize the Bible was written by men. It was not "the word of God". It was men's interpretations of events and teachings.

I feel the Bible was definitely written by man, but we'll never know. I know many religious people including a Rabbi that believes the Bible was written by men. Its a big storybook. Whether thats a bad or a good thing, is up to you.
 
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: conjur
Oh, very much so!

I have about a dozen books yet to read and then I'll pick up those. Ehrman's seems the most intriguing. Listening to him explain how the Bible was pieced together and that the Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John but, rather, attributed to them makes one realize the Bible was written by men. It was not "the word of God". It was men's interpretations of events and teachings.

I feel the Bible was definitely written by man, but we'll never know. I know many religious people including a Rabbi that believes the Bible was written by men. Its a big storybook. Whether thats a bad or a good thing, is up to you.

The bible's real and I know it, my priest told me so. He said that's why we had to watch those movies togeather and I had to exercise in his lap...
 
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: conjur
Oh, very much so!

I have about a dozen books yet to read and then I'll pick up those. Ehrman's seems the most intriguing. Listening to him explain how the Bible was pieced together and that the Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John but, rather, attributed to them makes one realize the Bible was written by men. It was not "the word of God". It was men's interpretations of events and teachings.

I feel the Bible was definitely written by man, but we'll never know. I know many religious people including a Rabbi that believes the Bible was written by men. Its a big storybook. Whether thats a bad or a good thing, is up to you.

The bible's real and I know it, my priest told me so. He said that's why we had to watch those movies togeather and I had to exercise in his lap...

Of course it was written by man. And Lazy8s now I know where they got the idea for this stained glass window 😛
 
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Originally posted by: conjur
Oh, very much so!

I have about a dozen books yet to read and then I'll pick up those. Ehrman's seems the most intriguing. Listening to him explain how the Bible was pieced together and that the Gospels were not written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John but, rather, attributed to them makes one realize the Bible was written by men. It was not "the word of God". It was men's interpretations of events and teachings.

I feel the Bible was definitely written by man, but we'll never know. I know many religious people including a Rabbi that believes the Bible was written by men. Its a big storybook. Whether thats a bad or a good thing, is up to you.

The bible's real and I know it, my priest told me so. He said that's why we had to watch those movies togeather and I had to exercise in his lap...

Of course it was written by man. And Lazy8s now I know where they got the idea for this stained glass window 😛

Sick. Sadly, there is so much corruption in the Christian religion
 
Originally posted by: Tinkerhell
Sick. Sadly, there is so much corruption in the Christian religion

A great man once said "Never judge the Jewish religion by the Jews". I think that can go for every religion.
 
I'm scared of God, personally.

For all his infinite love he shows these tongue speaking people, think of the other 5 billion people on earth who aren't christian that are going to suffer forever.
 
Back
Top