Jmmsbnd007
Diamond Member
- May 29, 2002
- 3,286
- 0
- 0
Just canceled my order for my VP171b (bastards at dell delayed it by a month). I could use the money, and I'll probably wait for OLED/12ms panels.
LCDs don't have a refresh rate. Therefore, your argument is moot.Originally posted by: p4crusher
Lcd's suck my old crt I bought 3 years ago for $400 bucks is running at 2048x1536 @ 75hertz how many new lcd's can do that and at what price.
Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007
LCDs don't have a refresh rate. Therefore, your argument is moot.Originally posted by: p4crusher
Lcd's suck my old crt I bought 3 years ago for $400 bucks is running at 2048x1536 @ 75hertz how many new lcd's can do that and at what price.
My point exactly.Originally posted by: p4crusher
Also my "old cheap 21" crt runs from 800x600 to 2048x1536 while still looking good no crt can claim that.Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007
LCDs don't have a refresh rate. Therefore, your argument is moot.Originally posted by: p4crusher
Lcd's suck my old crt I bought 3 years ago for $400 bucks is running at 2048x1536 @ 75hertz how many new lcd's can do that and at what price.
Originally posted by: ed21x
From a non-technical, non-quantative standpoint, there's something about the LCD that just makes it so much better than a CRT. Better to the point where once you switch from CRT to LCD, you can't really go back, and its this sorta thing that people who don't have LCD's won't understand. After owning two MAG LCD's (15'' and 17''), whenever I go back to a friend's CRT, there's just this lack of smoothness and finesse by which the LCD displays the picture- a constant smooth transition of pixel rather than a cathode ray tube scanning at insane rates that just makes it so much easier on the eyes and the mind.
Originally posted by: trikster2
Originally posted by: ed21x
From a non-technical, non-quantative standpoint, there's something about the LCD that just makes it so much better than a CRT. Better to the point where once you switch from CRT to LCD, you can't really go back, and its this sorta thing that people who don't have LCD's won't understand. After owning two MAG LCD's (15'' and 17''), whenever I go back to a friend's CRT, there's just this lack of smoothness and finesse by which the LCD displays the picture- a constant smooth transition of pixel rather than a cathode ray tube scanning at insane rates that just makes it so much easier on the eyes and the mind.
Exactly!
If all you can afford is staring into a lightbulb, OK, but don't claim it's better....
Originally posted by: TwiceOver
Granted they are beautiful, sharp, nice on the eyes... But am I the only one that hasn't gone to LCD? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to, but c'mon $450 for a DVI 17", I can't do that. I was lucky to swing $165 for my 21" crt.
Anyone else have LCD envy?
Originally posted by: bed21x
From a non-technical, non-quantative standpoint, there's something about the LCD that just makes it so much better than a CRT. Better to the point where once you switch from CRT to LCD, you can't really go back, and its this sorta thing that people who don't have LCD's won't understand. After owning two MAG LCD's (15'' and 17''), whenever I go back to a friend's CRT, there's just this lack of smoothness and finesse by which the LCD displays the picture- a constant smooth transition of pixel rather than a cathode ray tube scanning at insane rates that just makes it so much easier on the eyes and the mind.