• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I don't understand women going first

CrazyLazy

Platinum Member
The recent plane landing in the Hudson made me think of this. People were talking about how noble the passengers were for letting the women go first. This doesn't make sense to me. Maybe back when the Titanic sunk women had a right to go first, they tended to be much weaker strength wise and would have a much more difficult time surviving than a man.

But in modern times I would say an average man thrown into the water to die vs. an average female getting thrown in would last the same amount of time. I think along with all the rights woman have gained (voting, employment etc.) they should also have to give up perks like this.

I think instead we should just give priority to children and the elderly, both of which are significantly weaker and stand a much greater chance of dying for that reason.
 
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.
 
Originally posted by: TallBill
100 women and 1 man can repopulate. 100 men and 1 woman can't.

That is the most awesome, relevant answer I have seen out of ATOT in 2009.

:beer:
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.

Another incredibly witty personal attack from oldsmoboat.
 
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
The recent plane landing in the Hudson made me think of this. People were talking about how noble the passengers were for letting the women go first. This doesn't make sense to me. Maybe back when the Titanic sunk women had a right to go first, they tended to be much weaker strength wise and would have a much more difficult time surviving than a man.

But in modern times I would say an average man thrown into the water to die vs. an average female getting thrown in would last the same amount of time. I think along with all the rights woman have gained (voting, employment etc.) they should also have to give up perks like this.

I think instead we should just give priority to children and the elderly, both of which are significantly weaker and stand a much greater chance of dying for that reason.

Children and Elderly do get priority, dumbass. Stop asking stupid questions.
 
Originally posted by: FP
Originally posted by: TallBill
100 women and 1 man can repopulate. 100 men and 1 woman can't.

That is the most awesome, relevant answer I have seen out of ATOT in 2009.

:beer:

That's not really relevant with modern day fertility technologies.
 
It's called chivalry you sack of crap. Same reason we open doors for them. George Costanza is probably your hero.
 
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
Originally posted by: FP
Originally posted by: TallBill
100 women and 1 man can repopulate. 100 men and 1 woman can't.

That is the most awesome, relevant answer I have seen out of ATOT in 2009.

:beer:

That's not really relevant with modern day fertility technologies.

Man you are really stupid aren't you?

Fertility technologies have nothing to do with a 9-month gestation period you fool.
 
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
The recent plane landing in the Hudson made me think of this. People were talking about how noble the passengers were for letting the women go first. This doesn't make sense to me. Maybe back when the Titanic sunk women had a right to go first, they tended to be much weaker strength wise and would have a much more difficult time surviving than a man.

But in modern times I would say an average man thrown into the water to die vs. an average female getting thrown in would last the same amount of time. I think along with all the rights woman have gained (voting, employment etc.) they should also have to give up perks like this.

I think instead we should just give priority to children and the elderly, both of which are significantly weaker and stand a much greater chance of dying for that reason.

Children and Elderly do get priority, dumbass. Stop asking stupid questions.

In the Hudson crash women and children were given priority. Transcript: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0901/15/ijvm.01.html

Relevant text:

JEFF KOLODJAY, PASSENGER ON U.S. AIRWAYS FLIGHT 154: There was the baby with the lady I remember on my left-hand shoulder, and she was trying to crawl over the seats. And I just remember saying, you know, women and children first, you know?
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.

:laugh:

:laugh:

 
Think about it. Would you jump out of a dry aircraft into the icy waters of the Hudson River in January? I think I'd start looking for luggage to help off load in that situation.
 
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.

Another incredibly witty personal attack from oldsmoboat.
How is pointing out the obvious an attack? It's true that you rode the short bus to school. It's true that you constantly whine like a 6 year old girl. It's true that the sky is blue.
Facts are facts.

 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: WaTaGuMp
What about the fact women already out populate men by a shitload?

Where do you get that 'fact' from?

ETA - Concentration on the 'shitload' remark.

Heard it on the radio or TV a long time ago, at the time it was 4-1 so could be higher now.
 
When I get on a plane I size up all the people between me and the exit and decide if I can take them. Doesn't everybody do this?
 
Originally posted by: WaTaGuMp
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: WaTaGuMp
What about the fact women already out populate men by a shitload?

Where do you get that 'fact' from?

ETA - Concentration on the 'shitload' remark.

Heard it on the radio or TV a long time ago, at the time it was 4-1 so could be higher now.

You shouldn't take everything you hear from Howard Stern or South Park so seriously.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.

Another incredibly witty personal attack from oldsmoboat.
How is pointing out the obvious an attack? It's true that you rode the short bus to school. It's true that you constantly whine like a 6 year old girl. It's true that the sky is blue.
Facts are facts.

Accusing another member of being retarded is a personal attack. I don't think anyone would dispute that. It also serves no purpose. ATOT needs to review their manners.
 
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: CrazyLazy
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
There's a lot of things you don't understand OP. Please don't bore us with them all. We'd have to make a forum for just you.

Another incredibly witty personal attack from oldsmoboat.
How is pointing out the obvious an attack? It's true that you rode the short bus to school. It's true that you constantly whine like a 6 year old girl. It's true that the sky is blue.
Facts are facts.

Accusing another member of being retarded is a personal attack. I don't think anyone would dispute that. It also serves no purpose. ATOT needs to review their manners.
This coming from the poster who thinks he should get priority in an emergency situation, to hell with all the women and children. 😉
 
Back
Top