I don't get it

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".



 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Savij
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".

You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon of the Republican Party.

Dave, you didn't finish that last sentence. I fixed it for you though.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon of the Republican Party.

Dave, you didn't finish that last sentence. I fixed it for you though.

For the record, I don't think I've ever voted for a republican above the local city government level. I don't vote strictly by party line so I may have, but can't remember doing so.

In addition, I fall smack in the middle of the middle class (absolutely no way I could be considered anything but middle class status by any standard). My parents are also in the middle class. They do make more than me, but I don't think that the would be considered upper-middle by any stretch of the imagination.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Savij
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".

You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.

I'll agree that this happens on the shorter term 2-5 year periods. But those are spaced out by longer periods of the growth of the middle class.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
You're not going to find data that is apocalyptic, just data that is slight and subject to debate as posted above.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: torpid
You're not going to find data that is apocalyptic, just data that is slight and subject to debate as posted above.


That's what I'm asking for: data. Someone show me data that is more than just an economic cycle or fluctuation.
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: torpid
You're not going to find data that is apocalyptic, just data that is slight and subject to debate as posted above.


That's what I'm asking for: data. Someone show me data that is more than just an economic cycle or fluctuation.

No such data exists, because all economic data is subject to political spin / interpretation. No matter what data someone shows you, you will be able to have skepticism and 100 different reasons why the data doesn't prove anything. Since we live in the real world, there won't be any data where the middle class goes from 50% of americans to 0.2%, and that is the only data that will satisfy some people (you).
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: torpid
You're not going to find data that is apocalyptic, just data that is slight and subject to debate as posted above.


That's what I'm asking for: data. Someone show me data that is more than just an economic cycle or fluctuation.

No such data exists, because all economic data is subject to political spin / interpretation. No matter what data someone shows you, you will be able to have skepticism and 100 different reasons why the data doesn't prove anything. Since we live in the real world, there won't be any data where the middle class goes from 50% of americans to 0.2%, and that is the only data that will satisfy some people (you).


Ok, here's a challange: I will be happy with ANY data that shows we lost more households from the 25th to 75th percentile income group (as a percentage of the total number of households) than we gained in ANY 10 year period since the 1930's.

edit: It must be actual data from a somewhat trustworthy source. No talking heads without the numbers, no guy blogging about how he Communists should take over or any of that.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon of the Republican Party.

Dave, you didn't finish that last sentence. I fixed it for you though.

Awwwwww Thank You. :thumbsup:

I didn't forget, I'm not allowed to use that word in OT
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon of the Republican Party.

Dave, you didn't finish that last sentence. I fixed it for you though.

Awwwwww Thank You. :thumbsup:

I didn't forget, I'm not allowed to use that word in OT

And once again I'll say that I voted for Kerry.

 

RCN

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2005
2,134
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674


You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.
Well I'm once again at the bottom of the middle class/ borderline poor. Maybe you could provide a link because I don't see it shrinking either...........
 

jupiter57

Diamond Member
Nov 18, 2001
4,600
3
71
No data for you, just a sort of Rant:
The middle class is not shrinking, in fact, it's probably actually growing.
It seems that so many people feel they should add the $30K they charge yearly on their credit card to their annual income!
That's right, live like the upper class until it catches up with you! So many people nowadays paying House payments with Credit cards, paying one card with another, and as the guy in the commercial says, "I'm in debt up to my eyeballs".
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
You don't trust the fact check site? Jeez, sorry, no site will please you if that is the case.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: torpid
You don't trust the fact check site? Jeez, sorry, no site will please you if that is the case.

I see short term data there.
 

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Savij
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".

You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.


This boy has already made up his mind, so what's the point of looking up data for him if he has already postured himself in his thread to question it? :confused:
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: ValkyrieofHouston
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Savij
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".

You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.


This boy has already made up his mind, so what's the point of looking up data for him if he has already postured himself in his thread to question it? :confused:

Yes, based on the numbers I've seen I've decided one way. If someone will show me some real long term numbers disputing it then I will acknowledge it and possibly change my mind.

Show me the numbers. That's all I'm asking.
 

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: ValkyrieofHouston
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Savij
I did a quick glance through some census data and it looks like overall the trend is a shifting of households from the lower end of the pay scale to the middle and upper sections (as a percentage of the total number of households). I just don't see any actual data to back up the argument that the elite are oppressing workers and the rich are trampling over everyone else. Someone please point me to the facts that say that the average family is getting shat upon.

*I want macro data for the US. I do understand that there are cities, regions, and industries that are growing and shrinking at all times. It's unforunate but a fact of life. It's easy to point out a city that has been affected by a loss in manufacturing jobs or point out that there isn't much of a horseshoeing industry like there was in the "good old days".

**I want data that for at least 2 or 3 decades. I don't feel that any macroeconomic trends can be seen in short term (a few years) of data. We aren't doing as well as we were in the late '90s when adding an "E" to your product could net you 5 billion dollars and a Lotus, but I don't feel that the current state of the economy sucks and Marx was right just because it's not as easy to generate wealth as it was in the "New Economy".

You'll find plenty of threads and links in P&N.

However by the sound of your tone you don't believe that the middle class is shrinking because you are already in the upper echelon.


This boy has already made up his mind, so what's the point of looking up data for him if he has already postured himself in his thread to question it? :confused:

Yes, based on the numbers I've seen I've decided one way. If someone will show me some real long term numbers disputing it then I will acknowledge it and possibly change my mind.

Show me the numbers. That's all I'm asking.


I have a question for you, if you don't believe that the claims are true, then why does it matter to you? Just curious...
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: torpid
You don't trust the fact check site? Jeez, sorry, no site will please you if that is the case.

I see short term data there.

I rest my case.

Can you point out any numbers that relate more than a few years of data that say the middle class is shrinking there? I went through it, but I keep seeing 2000-2003 referenced. In my opinion that is short term data. I am not going to dispute the fact that the middle class does shrink for short periods of time, but I simply don't see any numbers to say that is true in the long run. Please, just show me the numbers.