Originally posted by: sirjonk
Frankly, it's not that people think Obama thinks these things (excluding Hannity), they merely do not like that he chose to stay at a church where the pastor did think these things. It's really just that simple. McCain is doing the pandering thing to Robertson and people are accepting that in election years base-pandering is expected. The situation here is that Obama attended the church without the pandering motive, and that's the issue. If Obama went to a more moderate church the last 20 years, but in 2008 spoke at Wright's church, sure there'd be a few snipes about how he's pandering to 'angry blacks' to get their vote, but it would be a flash in the pan issue.
Ignoring the very real difference between what McCain is doing with the hatemongers on the right and what Obama has done for the last 20 years is a mistake. He really does need to explain it better, because I don't think he hit the right notes in his speech. I really think this is a serious problem for his campaign, and trying to brush it off as the same as what McCain is doing will not be a satisfactory response. Obama has had very strong answers for just about everything so far, and is a master of language. He should sit down and come up with some really good explanation on why he stayed in that church. Because if he gets the nom, I'll vote for him, but I still don't get why he stayed. And if I as an eventual Obama supporter don't get it, I don't think those who are on the fence about him are going to get it.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
In fact, I agree with his pastor on several points.
God **** America.
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Frankly, it's not that people think Obama thinks these things (excluding Hannity), they merely do not like that he chose to stay at a church where the pastor did think these things. It's really just that simple. McCain is doing the pandering thing to Robertson and people are accepting that in election years base-pandering is expected. The situation here is that Obama attended the church without the pandering motive, and that's the issue. If Obama went to a more moderate church the last 20 years, but in 2008 spoke at Wright's church, sure there'd be a few snipes about how he's pandering to 'angry blacks' to get their vote, but it would be a flash in the pan issue.
Ignoring the very real difference between what McCain is doing with the hatemongers on the right and what Obama has done for the last 20 years is a mistake. He really does need to explain it better, because I don't think he hit the right notes in his speech. I really think this is a serious problem for his campaign, and trying to brush it off as the same as what McCain is doing will not be a satisfactory response. Obama has had very strong answers for just about everything so far, and is a master of language. He should sit down and come up with some really good explanation on why he stayed in that church. Because if he gets the nom, I'll vote for him, but I still don't get why he stayed. And if I as an eventual Obama supporter don't get it, I don't think those who are on the fence about him are going to get it.
Basically it comes down to it being better to play the political field and pander (which is basically lying) to people to get their support than to feel anger about the socio-economic status of the people you closely relate to. It's not as if Wright didn't do alot of good for his community. It only takes a few minutes of research to see the principles the man stands for that overrides the anger he feels. It also doesn't take long to see why black Americans would attend his church if you spent a few minutes in South Chicago. As an example of the fair and equal practices of politics in Chicago, a quick look at where the public transportation system ends is enough to show you how a community organizer in Hyde Park would feel.
Dr. Wright?s talking points (3.1.7) for Trinity United Church of Christ its Web site and the Black Value System
Quote:
One of the biggest gaps in knowledge that causes the kind of ignorance that you hear spouted by this man [Erik Rush] and those like him, has to do with the fact that these persons are completely ignorant when it comes to the Black religious tradition. The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone?s book, Black Power and Black Theology.
Dr. Cone has explained the his theology as follows[1],[2],[3]
Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. . . . Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Topic Title]: I declare Barack Hussein Obama unelectable
Topic Summary: He should GTFO the race
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: jpeyton
In fact, I agree with his pastor on several points.
God **** America.
Wow, that is just outright pathetic.
Polls taken before his last speech. Opinions change.Originally posted by: lupi
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: jpeyton
In fact, I agree with his pastor on several points.
God **** America.
Wow, that is just outright pathetic.
Nothing more than your typical Obamabot, which is probably why he's now losing in polls to Hillary and Mccain.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Receiving go-aheads is different from getting hateful sh!t preached to you every Sunday.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
He's electable, even with his pastor.
In fact, I agree with his pastor on several points.
God **** America.
Originally posted by: Bird222
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Receiving go-aheads is different from getting hateful sh!t preached to you every Sunday.
I suppose you have been a faithful member of Obama's church for the past 20 years, otherwise how would you know what has been preached every Sunday. See that's the problem with people, they take 3-4 snipets of something and stretch it into 'preached every Sunday'. Give me a break.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
The flyover already always votes Republican. Nobody cares about them.
Originally posted by: senseamp
I have a feeling Wright will be the least of Blabla Blablama's problems. This guy is like an onion where we are just now starting to pull away the layers, and there is a lot of tears ahead for the Democrats when he's the nominee.
Originally posted by: Bird222
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Receiving go-aheads is different from getting hateful sh!t preached to you every Sunday.
I suppose you have been a faithful member of Obama's church for the past 20 years, otherwise how would you know what has been preached every Sunday. See that's the problem with people, they take 3-4 snipets of something and stretch it into 'preached every Sunday'. Give me a break.
