halik
Lifer
I got these...I also understand 10. It's a matrix (matrice?) so you multiply 5x2. The rest make my head hurt...
/BA undergraduate
Edit: silverpig apparently has the correct answer for 10. I'm going to shut up now 😀
5 choose 2
combination
I got these...I also understand 10. It's a matrix (matrice?) so you multiply 5x2. The rest make my head hurt...
/BA undergraduate
Edit: silverpig apparently has the correct answer for 10. I'm going to shut up now 😀
I don't see seven. Just a number slightly smaller than 7 ...
Exactly how much smaller?
I don't see seven. Just a number slightly smaller than 7 ...
3 is for the unicode character 3. Not sure about the others. (2*phi-1)^2 looks familiar, but I don't know why. Something to do with trig identities, maybe? :hmm:
They should have done 9.9999999999 for 10 instead of 6.9 = 7 on the clock
12 - obvious
1 - not sure
2 - It's just the infinite sum 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8...
3 - no idea
4 - 1/2 mod 7? I dunno
5 - seen this before but I can't remember
6 - 3x2x1 = 6
7 - 6 + 0.9r = 6 + 1 = 7 🙂
8 - simple binary 0111 = 8
9 - 21 in base 4 I think
10 - combinatorics... there are 10 ways to pick 2 objects from 5
11 - that's 11 in hex
I don't see seven. Just a number slightly smaller than 7 ...
What I see is an example of one of the few imperfections in our mathmatic language. Namely; fractions don't exist in reality.
Nerd thread, not a 'tard thread. You know - the guys who are wayyyyy smarter than you?
Fake Crusher is hotter than real Crusher:
![]()
8 actually shows as 1000 in binary. 0111 would have been 7.
Infinitely smaller even!
What I see is an example of one of the few imperfections in our mathmatic language. Namely; fractions don't exist in reality.
Yes because if you a cut a cake or a pie into 6 pieces and take 1 piece you definitely don't have 5/6 of either a cake or a pie left.
Yes because if you a cut a cake or a pie into 6 pieces and take 1 piece you definitely don't have 5/6 of either a cake or a pie left.
And apparently is freezing
🙂 sadly, I could read a binary clock without flinching, at very least, the numbers 1-12 are pretty easy to see. The real test would be if they used a IEEE style float representation for the time... 🙂 (mantissa and all).The problem with that clock is any (insert word here for slow person) can read it due to position of hands. Put a binary clock up there with LEDs (like the watch) and see how many (nerd wannabes) can tell time without asking! 😀
0x0b is 11 in hex. other than that I'm with you, I have no idea what that says...
The problem with that clock is any (insert word here for slow person) can read it due to position of hands. Put a binary clock up there with LEDs (like the watch) and see how many (nerd wannabes) can tell time without asking! 😀