I bought my first pair of Wal-Mart shoes

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BrownShoes

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2008
1,055
0
0
I've been donating my time at a local animal farm - bought some waterproof work boots at Wal-Mart for $25.
They are pretty comfy. I couldn't be happier with my cheap purchase.
Although, normally, footwear is not where you want to skimp on the pennies - your feet will end up paying the price.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,546
832
126
LOL @ ATOT fashion. How do you guys ever get laid?

They just find females who don't care about things like personal appearance (nice haircut, nice clothes etc) now these females aren't exactly the cream of the crop. But if a man is fine wearing cheap $15 shoes I'm going to guess he's fine with 2nd rate pussy too.

And if you aim low your odds of scoring are infinitely better.
 

Mr. Lennon

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2004
3,492
1
81
They just find females who don't care about things like personal appearance (nice haircut, nice clothes etc) now these females aren't exactly the cream of the crop. But if a man is fine wearing cheap $15 shoes I'm going to guess he's fine with 2nd rate pussy too.

And if you aim low your odds of scoring are infinitely better.

True words. To be honest I don't spend $100+ on shoes/jeans/etc, But I maintain a good/original look.

I don't think $15 dollar Walmart shoes can even get you 2nd rate pussy :D
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
I hate to admit it, but I spend a ridonkulous amount of money on shoes :(

It's nothing to drop $300+ on a pair of shoes. Not like I have the money for it, just a weak spot for them. Have 3 closets full of shoes, would make Imelda Marcos embarrassed.

However, both men and women do notice them very frequently. Multiple times a day. So it is true that people notice shoes. Just wish I had a bit more self control when it comes to buying them...

The more expensive brands tend to be the only ones who actually pay attention to physics though.

A general cheap shoe is not a good fit for every single person. For some people, if you have a truly "average" foot, you'll be fine with the initial fit. And for the people who have both an average foot and an average stride/gait/stance, they'll feel comfortable for the long-haul (until they fall apart).

How much faster a cheap brand falls apart compared to Nike or some other mass-market higher-priced brand? Can't say for sure.
But to get shoes that won't cause problems during running or can handle nearly any task you need them to (run for a little bit, need to walk a lot or be on feet for a long time)... well, I stand by the higher-priced shoes.
Brooks were my standby running shoe, until recently...for some reason, a newer-version of the same exact "model" I've been using since a running shoe expert suggested them, began giving me problems every single time I ran. All in my shins and ankles.

Fairly certain my stride never changed, because when I went to a different store (multiple running shoe stores had people recommend me the exact same model of Brooks, or a few other brands and specific models), I had them re-check my stride just to make sure. Yet again, the Brooks Adrenaline model was recommended. I told them that model used to be great for me, but has been giving me hell lately. Recommended me the Nike LunarGlide+, and well... I'm not turning back now. Pain-free running again. :)

This was the first pair of shoes I had bought from Nike in a very long time. Typical walking athletic-style shoe was New Balance or similar, and I do have a pair of low-top K-Swiss (got them at The Buckle) that I really like... they have like zero support/cushion though, and are beat up. Still holding up, and I like wearing them with jeans... I hate the look of low-tops and shorts though, and thus time for a new pair of everyday shoes since it's getting into shorts season here. Might have to find something similar to wear when I go out and it's a cooler night or something, and to have around when the season changes.
Back to Nike again, mainly because I really wanted to give the Nike Free model-line a try. I now have a pair of Nike Free Trainers, so they aren't as "free" as the most minimal of the Nike Free line, and they also have a little bit more lateral-movement support. So far I really like them, but the long-haul will be a little more necessary.

I really don't entirely like or hate the look of wearing athletic-style shoes all the time, and is generally why I have the K-Swiss shoes I have. I need to look again into some "dressier" everyday shoes, because I'd rather have some nicer shoes when going out in jeans, as "sneakers" are kind of boring wardrobe-wise.
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
I don't really wear sneakers or athletic shoes much. I have a pair of MBTs for jogging, and ASICS for running. Been looking for cycling shoes, but haven't bit yet.

I personally prefer to wear dress shoes and the like most of the time. Not patent tuxedo shoes, but something with a little more flair and stand out from the Rockports and Bostonians.

Love leather soled boots. The loud clack when you walk is a real attention getter, which isn't a bad thing ;)
 

wheresmybacon

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2004
3,899
0
76
There are absolutely some cases where the get-what-you-pay-for rule does not apply. Shoes from Walmart is not one of those cases.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
A general cheap shoe is not a good fit for every single person. For some people, if you have a truly "average" foot, you'll be fine with the initial fit. And for the people who have both an average foot and an average stride/gait/stance, they'll feel comfortable for the long-haul (until they fall apart).

i'm pretty sure all non custom shoes are built for an average foot.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
i'm pretty sure all non custom shoes are built for an average foot.

Try and take any pair of shoes you feel like trying, and go run with them.

If you have above-average pronation or supination, don't have a perfectly average arch, and just choose any random running shoe - you might get lucky or might be in a world of hurt.

When I say average foot, I'm referring to the arch. Yes, most commercial shoes are designed for the average arch and average foot width ratio (width v. shoe size). But there are many mass-produced shoes that are tailored for those who aren't average, and more importantly, the way the shoe is designed is tailored for a certain range of gaits.
No running shoe works for every single natural gait. If you're slightly off the average gait, like me, you can't just use any neutral shoe.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,828
37
91
most all of your typical shoes and boots are actually very cheap despite the labor intensive and have a huge variety of markup depending on who's selling them. Where it gets into actual cost is the more exotic and quality, durable materials.

One reason i choose certain hiking boots over sport shoe brands like Nike besides the fact their made to sustain and soften heavier loads making any surface more comfy in long duration is the differences of materials used such as Goodyear adhesives and engineered treading, thicker leather, Goretex linings, butyl rubbers,thinsulate,vibram, steel lace eyelets...etc
vs Nike and the majority of others using Vulcanized or synth rubber, soft plastics/vinyl, polyeurithane, plastic eyelets, phylon which is weak, eva, phylite..etc. their just junk and always overpriced when you look into the actual materials and R&D and not the marketing.
though obviously a custom shoe is always going to be the most comfortable or should be at least.