you need to chill :wine:Originally posted by: JohnCU
OMG I HAVE FINALLY FOUND A TERM FOR WHAT I BELIEVE.
i absolutely hate god if he exists. what a fucking piece of shit.
lol.Originally posted by: JohnCU
OMG I HAVE FINALLY FOUND A TERM FOR WHAT I BELIEVE.
i absolutely hate god if he exists. what a fucking piece of shit.
the 2 year old starving in a 3rd world country needs to chill. i'm sure god in his almightyness saw that and made the world anyway.Originally posted by: xSauronx
you need to chill :wine:Originally posted by: JohnCU
OMG I HAVE FINALLY FOUND A TERM FOR WHAT I BELIEVE.
i absolutely hate god if he exists. what a fucking piece of shit.
Pertinent quotation:Originally posted by: nkgreen
Perhaps sin is a very bad thing?Originally posted by: destrekor
eternity of damnation is a very bad punishment. this god must be a psychopath and needs a LOT of counseling by his elder gods. he's like Hitler embodied in god.Originally posted by: nkgreen
Did your mother spank you? It makes sense for one to be loved, yet face the consequences of their actions.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
This is true. He may have no problem sending you to the burning fires of hell for all eternity, but rest assured love you he does.Originally posted by: maddogchen
thats okay, God still loves you.
actually. Wow. Maybe Hitler was God embodied in man? :shocked: !!!!
Epicurus forgot something...Originally posted by: Vageetasjn
Responsibility is a slippery topic to argue, but surely a god would know what would transpire within his diorama project?Originally posted by: nkgreen
You should be ashamed of your sin, which God is not responsible for.
?Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God??
-Epicurus
This is one of the oldest arguments...
Great explanation for How, but it fails to explain the Why.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
As for god... well... I think scientists are still working on that one.
We invented birth defects, miscarriages and childhood diseases?Originally posted by: Caveman
Epicurus forgot something...Originally posted by: Vageetasjn
Responsibility is a slippery topic to argue, but surely a god would know what would transpire within his diorama project?Originally posted by: nkgreen
You should be ashamed of your sin, which God is not responsible for.
?Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God??
-Epicurus
This is one of the oldest arguments...
We all want to do it "our way". Why blame God for evil we invent?
It wasn't. The face recognition architecture is also related to perception of attractiveness, I don't know what other explanation you can come up with here. Are you trying to suggest brain function is independent of you liking a female?Originally posted by: jersiq
Great explanation for How, but it fails to explain the Why.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
As for god... well... I think scientists are still working on that one.
Why did I find one woman more attractive and compatible than any other? Surely, when I met and had relationships with other women, my neurochemistry was the same with them.
Originally posted by: destrekor
so.. is that like... your a nonconformist? If that's the case.. YOUR ACTUALLY CONFORMING TO NONCONFORMIST WAYS! CONFORMIST! :laugh:
rebel against authority! VIVA LA REVOLUTION!![]()
Those aren't love. Reality, bitch.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
Unless you have a better explanation, they are... bitch.Originally posted by: Cerpin Taxt
Those aren't love. Reality, bitch.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
What is love? Its a feeling right? The feelings and emotions you feel are chemical reactions occuring in your brain. I dare you to take ecstasy once and tell me you don't love everyone in the room with your state of mind.Originally posted by: Cerpin Taxt
Those aren't love. Reality, bitch.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
Actually the feelings and emotions are electrical impulses. Actually, they're not limited to electricity, more specifically what they are is binary information patterns, electricity just happens to be the way they are propagated. Neurochemicals are just agonists and antagonists, or shortcuts to information transmission.Originally posted by: SleepWalkerX
What is love? Its a feeling right? The feelings and emotions you feel are chemical reactions occuring in your brain. I dare you to take ecstasy once and tell me you don't love everyone in the room with your state of mind.Originally posted by: Cerpin Taxt
Those aren't love. Reality, bitch.Originally posted by: NanoStuff
I do. Norepinephrine, dopamine, pheromones, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus and clinical observation of related neurochemical proportions to human attachment. Science bitch.Originally posted by: nkgreen
But I have no physical evidence of love either, and I believe in it.
So, you believe God wants us to suffer?Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
We invented birth defects, miscarriages and childhood diseases?Originally posted by: Caveman
Epicurus forgot something...Originally posted by: Vageetasjn
Responsibility is a slippery topic to argue, but surely a god would know what would transpire within his diorama project?Originally posted by: nkgreen
You should be ashamed of your sin, which God is not responsible for.
?Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God??
-Epicurus
This is one of the oldest arguments...
We all want to do it "our way". Why blame God for evil we invent?
But birth defects aren't evil, you say. And no, from a materialist point of view they're not. They're just natural.
But it turns out when you put someone in charge of the Universe, especially someone you claim to be a moral authority, he turns out to not even be up to the ethical standards of the worst human being.
How adorable, he thinks he will get an afterlife for worshiping a character from an old story.Originally posted by: Xylitol
I'm still
going to go to heaven for believing in Jesus
God is all-knowing. From the moment of Creation, he would have known how everything would transpire, right down to every last birth defect, and stillborn child. Thus you must conclude:Originally posted by: Caveman
So, you believe God wants us to suffer?
Why?
You believe that things like birth defects, miscarriages and childhood diseases come from God?
What evidence is there of this? Doesn't logic force us to believe the very definition of "God" would make it impossible for him to hurt us?
Free moral agency is a much more plausible/logical explanation for the ills of the world. There is mountains of irrefutable empiricle evidence generated for us all on a daily basis as we react with other humans.
What about free moral agency? Doesn't everybody want that? Everyone complains when they don't feel "free" to decide for themselves.Originally posted by: Jeff7
God is all-knowing. From the moment of Creation, he would have known how everything would transpire, right down to every last birth defect, and stillborn child. Thus you must conclude:Originally posted by: Caveman
So, you believe God wants us to suffer?
Why?
You believe that things like birth defects, miscarriages and childhood diseases come from God?
What evidence is there of this? Doesn't logic force us to believe the very definition of "God" would make it impossible for him to hurt us?
Free moral agency is a much more plausible/logical explanation for the ills of the world. There is mountains of irrefutable empiricle evidence generated for us all on a daily basis as we react with other humans.
- that this horrible suffering was all part of his grand, mysterious "plan," in which case it's actually a good thing
- he didn't care enough to try again and fix the bugs in his little concoction
- he is amused by suffering
Take your pick.