Gotta love Antifa folks... fighting fascism... with fascism. Whudda thunk it?
That said, I'll never stand by a side that supports bringing down statutes. They are for historical purposes - and nothing more. The argument of "It should be in a museum" (which is often used for the confederate flag) is complete bullshit. There is nothing that says history has one location and it's a museum.
You don't see anyone going up to these statues and worshiping them for fighting for slavery. Those that choose to try and remove and ignore history in anyway just remind me of the famous quote:
Speaking of - How many of these ignorant twats are too stupid to realize that with all the "White supremacy" talk in regards to slavery support in the South - how many of these kids do you think glazed over in school the fact that plenty of blacks owned black slaves in the United States? Not even mentioning the blacks that initially sold them into slavery in the first place? Oh those are just little details that aren't important to their "White man" messaging, best to sweep that under the rug.
well, your post here kinda proves your criticism that
you actually don't know anything about the history here. The history that these statues represent is Jim Crow and anti-Civil Rights. These statues were largely erected well after the civil war as a celebration of Jim Crowe "defeat of the free blacks" or much later, to protest the burgeoning Civil Rights movement in the 50s. Not all, but many of these statues exist expressly as a condemnation of the black race and an antagonistic support of their subjugation. Yes, white "christians" of the time approved of and built these statues.
...so, I'm not really sure what kind of history needs to be preserved here. I think maybe taking down a few of them and tossing them in a museum that shows them in the proper context ("these are explicitly monuments to hate"), but overall just tear them all down.
For
this statue, which appears to be a memorial to the unnamed, general confederate soldier...I don't know enough about its specific context to comment. The
subject, to me anyway, seems neutral and proper. An argument can be made about specific individuals that while they may have been "great leaders" at some point, went on to lead heinous lives (Forrest) or the realities of their lifestyle reject the historical myths (Lee); but I feel that a simple memorial to the ave. soldier is relatively benign. At least, it seems to me anyway. I was never subjugated or have to live my life daily expecting to be profiled in some way.