http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2004/pdf/hdr04_complete.pdf
interesting to check out the stats for each country, very interesting read
interesting to check out the stats for each country, very interesting read
2003 ranks:
1.Norway
2.Iceland
3.Sweden
4.Australia
5.Netherlands
6.Belgium
7.United States
8.Canada
9.Japan
10.Switzerland
2004 ranks: (change)
1.Norway (0)
2.Sweden (+1)
3.Australia (+1)
4.Canada (+4)
5.Netherlands (0)
6.Belgium (0)
7.Iceland (-5)
8.United States (-1)
9.Japan (0)
10.Ireland (+2)
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'm glad canada is talking back our lead....
we were 1st for a decade or so...plunged to 8th last year...anybody know why?
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'm glad canada is talking back our lead....
we were 1st for a decade or so...plunged to 8th last year...anybody know why?
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
the subtitle of the report is pretty strange:
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
While I'm not debating the rankings, the subtitle of the report is pretty strange: Cultural liberty in today's world. The human development rankings are supposed to take into account health, education, life expectancy, income, poverty levels and environmental quality. How does that relate to culture?
Looking at the top countries, many of those countries are pretty oppressive towards other cultures.
The Canadian government tries to control Canadian culture, TV, etc.
The Netherlands have officially claimed that multiculturalism is a failure.
Japan is extremely xenophobic (somewhat related ot culture).
Belgium is extremely racist (somewhat related to culture).
Switzerland's government has a party that has slogans such as "The Swiss are becoming negroes."
etc.
Canada isn't that bad though, not even in the same ballpark as the others I mentioned. I wonder why it's subtitled "Cultural Liberty in Today's World." Maybe it's buried deep within that 100 or so page report.
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Japan is extremely xenophobic (somewhat related ot culture).
Originally posted by: Kibbo
The title didn't affect any of the individual rankings, I don't think it would affect the overall rankings. They probably pick one pet issue every year and write about how the rankings and statistics reflect on that topic.
When they were referring to cultural freedom, they particularly focused on multi-culturalism.
This would be a plus for Canada, seeing as most of our regulations are there to preserve a place for culture that might be overwhelmed by the mass media, such as minimum Canadian content on the radio and in magazines, and Quebec's French language laws.
If these laws do have an effect on our overall culture, it would be to keep Canada from being even more American than it already is. Their effect is most noticed up here by what plays on the radio, and it seems to have an effect, seeing how many of our musicians have success down in your country (BNL, Sarah McLaughlin, Avril Lavigne.) It also leads to many bands that are hugely successful up here, even though they don't make it anywhere else.
Compare that to TV, where the stations can fulfill most of their content requirements through news reporting, which would be Canadian-made anyway. Can you name a single Canadian TV program? I bet that most teens here couldn't. The closest I think we can get to good shows are a few hyper-intellectual media satires, or a few political comedy programs.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Kibbo
The title didn't affect any of the individual rankings, I don't think it would affect the overall rankings. They probably pick one pet issue every year and write about how the rankings and statistics reflect on that topic.
When they were referring to cultural freedom, they particularly focused on multi-culturalism.
This would be a plus for Canada, seeing as most of our regulations are there to preserve a place for culture that might be overwhelmed by the mass media, such as minimum Canadian content on the radio and in magazines, and Quebec's French language laws.
If these laws do have an effect on our overall culture, it would be to keep Canada from being even more American than it already is. Their effect is most noticed up here by what plays on the radio, and it seems to have an effect, seeing how many of our musicians have success down in your country (BNL, Sarah McLaughlin, Avril Lavigne.) It also leads to many bands that are hugely successful up here, even though they don't make it anywhere else.
Compare that to TV, where the stations can fulfill most of their content requirements through news reporting, which would be Canadian-made anyway. Can you name a single Canadian TV program? I bet that most teens here couldn't. The closest I think we can get to good shows are a few hyper-intellectual media satires, or a few political comedy programs.
Red Green, there are many more, but that one is well known on both sides of the Border. I'm not a Teen though and may have just mucked up your question! :Q![]()
Originally posted by: Kibbo
When they were referring to cultural freedom, they particularly focused on multi-culturalism.
This would be a plus for Canada, seeing as most of our regulations are there to preserve a place for culture that might be overwhelmed by the mass media, such as minimum Canadian content on the radio and in magazines, and Quebec's French language laws.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Article 1
Article 2---same website, but different source--AP
Kibbo's "pet issue" suggestion seems supported by these links.
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Article 1
Article 2---same website, but different source--AP
Kibbo's "pet issue" suggestion seems supported by these links.
I would hardly call Belgium, a country where 82% of society has racist views, as a successful multicultural society.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Article 1
Article 2---same website, but different source--AP
Kibbo's "pet issue" suggestion seems supported by these links.
I would hardly call Belgium, a country where 82% of society has racist views, as a successful multicultural society.
Well, I guess you disagree with their assessment, make your own report then.
Perhaps they know something you don't?
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Article 1
Article 2---same website, but different source--AP
Kibbo's "pet issue" suggestion seems supported by these links.
I would hardly call Belgium, a country where 82% of society has racist views, as a successful multicultural society.
Well, I guess you disagree with their assessment, make your own report then.
Perhaps they know something you don't?
Perhaps they lack something... like common sense. It's just too gross of an error to take lightly. Just like forgetting that the Netherlands has officially declared multiculturalism a failure.
I find your way of thinking interesting... it's against the basic idea of a message board where you discuss issues. It's pretty silly to say things like "go do something about it instead of whining", "go write a report on it", etc.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: sandorski
Article 1
Article 2---same website, but different source--AP
Kibbo's "pet issue" suggestion seems supported by these links.
I would hardly call Belgium, a country where 82% of society has racist views, as a successful multicultural society.
Well, I guess you disagree with their assessment, make your own report then.
Perhaps they know something you don't?
Perhaps they lack something... like common sense. It's just too gross of an error to take lightly. Just like forgetting that the Netherlands has officially declared multiculturalism a failure.
I find your way of thinking interesting... it's against the basic idea of a message board where you discuss issues. It's pretty silly to say things like "go do something about it instead of whining", "go write a report on it", etc.
Their declaration matters how?