Howard Dean Portrays Rush Limbaugh as Cokehead?

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link
 

KidViciou$

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,998
0
0
your right rip, howard dean was wrong for what he said. he shoudl have called rush limbaugh a FAT cokehead!
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. Your just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

No ideas eh?

How bout just about everything opposite of what the Repugs are doing now to destroy the U.S.

Funny how you talked about War on Terror and Iraq separately, your hero and party talks of them as one in the same. Hmmmmmm

Administration and supporters of Lies, anything other than them in power will be enough for me if the Country survives long enough to get the Liars out of Power.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
your right rip, howard dean was wrong for what he said. he shoudl have called rush limbaugh a FAT cokehead!

You forgot to include hypocrite.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Aww, your not going to vote Dem??
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
your right rip, howard dean was wrong for what he said. he shoudl have called rush limbaugh a FAT cokehead!

Have you SEEN pictures of Limbaugh the past few years? The man is anything but fat, LOL.

Jason
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Tabb
How are showing the facts a personal attack? :)

How is this showing the facts? As I recall, Limbaugh was addicted to pain killers, not coke.

Jason

Actually, cocaine I beileve was used a painkiller....
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link

But really, why even bother quoting a worthless rag like that? Can't you embarrass yourself enough with your stupid comments and Fundamentalist fraudulence?

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Tabb
How are showing the facts a personal attack? :)

How is this showing the facts? As I recall, Limbaugh was addicted to pain killers, not coke.

Jason

Actually, cocaine I beileve was used a painkiller....

I don't think so, I never once heard that. I do recall hearing that it was a PRESCRIPTION drug (and Cocaine is NOT prescription).

In either case, come on, Rush has plenty of VALID reasons to be criticized for, this is just a bunch of nonsensical crap.

Jason
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
A recent study indicated that Oxycontin and Vicodin are the new drugs of choice among high school students. So it seems that Rush is a trendsetter for the youth of America.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
your right rip, howard dean was wrong for what he said. he shoudl have called rush limbaugh a FAT cokehead!

Sheesh can't you get anything right? He's a skinny Oxycontin addict . . . ;)
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link

Having NO ideas is better than having BAD ideas ... at least in my book. Not in yours, apparently.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link

Having NO ideas is better than having BAD ideas ... at least in my book. Not in yours, apparently.

I disagree on the following grounds: A person whose ideas you think are BAD at least has the courage and intellectual fortitude to THINK to some extent. Perhaps he doesn't think enough, perhaps he never learned to reason well (which is pretty likely given the state of our educational system in the US).

Meanwhile a person with NO ideas hasn't bothered to muster the motivation to even *start* his brain.

Bad ideas may equal a good person with a bad approach, but no ideas definitely equals a lazy, non-intellectual buffoon.

Jason
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Tabb
How are showing the facts a personal attack? :)

How is this showing the facts? As I recall, Limbaugh was addicted to pain killers, not coke.

Jason

Actually, cocaine I beileve was used a painkiller....

the difference is that one is LEGAL, and one is not. Rush got hooked on painkillers he took LEGALLY. He didn't just choose to start taking coke b/c he wanted to.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link

No "ideas" on Social Security. Well, majority of Americans agree with the Democrats on that, and reject Republican "ideas."
Democrats do have ideas on the war on terror. Um.. How about going after the actual terrorists who struck us on 9/11. There is an idea.
No ideas on the war on iraq? How about bringing in more allies, instead of alienating them and nominating some pighead to head diplomacy at the UN. There is an idea.
What are Bush's "ideas" on North Korea? Let the Chinese and Europeans take care of it?
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Riprorin
No ideas on social security, no ideas on the war on terror, no ideas on the war in Iraq, no ideas on North Korea, etc.

The obstructionist party has been reduced to immature falicious personal attacks.

Keep up the good work Democratic party. You're just insuring that your power will continue to dwindle.

Link

Having NO ideas is better than having BAD ideas ... at least in my book. Not in yours, apparently.

I disagree on the following grounds: A person whose ideas you think are BAD at least has the courage and intellectual fortitude to THINK to some extent. Perhaps he doesn't think enough, perhaps he never learned to reason well (which is pretty likely given the state of our educational system in the US).

Meanwhile a person with NO ideas hasn't bothered to muster the motivation to even *start* his brain.

Bad ideas may equal a good person with a bad approach, but no ideas definitely equals a lazy, non-intellectual buffoon.

Jason
Right you are, however the net effect is far worse with the person with BAD ideas than the status quo would be from the person with NO ideas. You'd have to agree with me there.

Besides, the Democrats actually DO have ideas, however the talking point morons who will remain nameless can't be bothered to even find out what they are. Who's intellectually lazy now?
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Well, Hitler had ideas, as did Lenin, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot. They don't get points for having ideas in my book.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Did you learn that Bush is Hitler from Moveon or did you think that up all by yourself?

Where did I say Bush is Hitler? Did you learn how to put words in other people's mouths from the Rush School of Dittoheads or it just comes naturally?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Did you learn that Bush is Hitler from Moveon or did you think that up all by yourself?

Hey, you said it :D

I think the point was that just having ideas isn't always a good thing. Taking some time and thinking up good ideas is preferable to going forward with the first dumbass idea that comes into your head. Or maybe the Republicans have it right..."A crummy plan now is better than a good plan later!"
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Did you learn that Bush is Hitler from Moveon or did you think that up all by yourself?

Where did I say Bush is Hitler? Did you learn how to put words in other people's mouths from the Rush School of Dittoheads or it just comes naturally?

You need to work on your originality.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Did you learn that Bush is Hitler from Moveon or did you think that up all by yourself?

Where did I say Bush is Hitler? Did you learn how to put words in other people's mouths from the Rush School of Dittoheads or it just comes naturally?

You need to work on your originality.

What does that have to do with you putting words in my mouth?
:roll: