Schmide
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2002
- 5,745
- 1,036
- 126
Hey HomerJS you've been here since 2002, pls show me your post back in '03 when Austin Goolsbee (Obama economic advisor) claimed the "books were cooked" when positive economic numbers were posted during the Bush admin:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/30/o...conomic-indicators-the-unemployment-myth.html
TIA
Fern
Kind of funny the BLS changed their way of gathering statistics about unemployment in 1994 directly because of what Austin Goolsbee was talking about in that article. Before that they were using rules and methods from 1967.
If there is a myth/corruption about the unemployment numbers, those complaining should site the reasons and declare a method for correcting these numbers as Austin Goolsbee did. Rather they just declared them corrupt, which kind of affirms the original reason for this thread.
Edit: I'd also like to point out that the date of the article is post election.
Last edited: