• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How the hell do you convince someone that the world WON'T end in 2012? *EDIT*

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
😱 I have never seen a (automobile) tire that has max psi at only 35. Can you post model (of the tire) and size? I would like to look into this.
My dad's older tires on his car had a max PSI rating of 35 while the newer pair that were added on have a max of 44psi.. The OEM tires for the car were Michelin Energy MXV4, max 35psi while the replacement were too Michelin Energy MXV4 but a max of 44psi...

Check out here:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.jsp?make=Michelin&model=Energy+MXV4+S8&tirePageLocQty=

Tire listed at the very bottom:
235/55R18 max psi : 35
 
don't you remember Y2K and all the dooms day kooks that whipped up alarmist crapola??
Except that Y2K was quite real and only through the diligent efforts of people who knew WTF they were talking about was disaster averted. See the difference?
 
OEM tires on a 2005 Nissan Xterra
Pix cut

I am an idiot. For some reason or other Nissan X-Terra did not register in my head as a suv. They have big aspect ratio and large diameters, thus have to have lower max psi. You would think I was asleep D:

I like how off topic we are 😛
 
Except that Y2K was quite real and only through the diligent efforts of people who knew WTF they were talking about was disaster averted. See the difference?


well of course it was real to those that bought the alarmist BS. and of course disaster was averted by the alarmist bell ringers.
 
well of course it was real to those that bought the alarmist BS. and of course disaster was averted by the alarmist bell ringers.
You are an idiot, don't take my word for it, ask anyone, they will tell you the same thing, that you're an idiot.
 
Except that Y2K was quite real and only through the diligent efforts of people who knew WTF they were talking about was disaster averted. See the difference?

Meh my old 386 PC with DOS 6.22 and windows 3.1 knew what the year 2000 was. The hubbub seemed a little trivial to me at the time.

But then, I was only 12 at the time too so didn't fully grasp all the other software out there that hadn't been programmed properly. But at least Microsoft had done it right :awe:
 
Meh my old 386 PC with DOS 6.22 and windows 3.1 knew what the year 2000 was. The hubbub seemed a little trivial to me at the time.

But then, I was only 12 at the time too so didn't fully grasp all the other software out there that hadn't been programmed properly. But at least Microsoft had done it right :awe:
Actually there WAS some MS software that had issues with Y2K and in the case of Windows 3.11, it was the file manager which had a subsequent update to address this issue. There is a BUNCH of software that had issues with Y2k, you just may not have noticed the errors because a lot were minor. The Y2K scare was more about power plants and other mission critical stuff hitting the fan when the year rolled over..
 
ya. just like all the idiots that took the bait on Y2K.

there was a real issue with y2k. and it was averted but only because people in the know did what was neccessary to modify the code in old system that had been around for decades. I work in one of those industries and was well aware of what could have happened if the trouble had not been fixed prior the new year.
 
Tell them to deposit all of their money on 31 December 2011 into your bank account. Because if it's the end of the world, they won't care; money will mean nothing. So it's not so much as a bet, but more like, "Well if you really believe it, then give me your money."
 
Easy solution.

Tell them that you'll give them $100 today, if they'll give you $1k on Jan 1, 2013. Adjust the numbers according to current financial situations and their stupidity.

I would just do a friendly bet of $10 as an "I told you" type of thing. $10 now, she gives you $20 on Jan 1.
 
Wasn't it your parents car?
The S60? That's technically owned by my dad but is suppose to be my sister's car. The Civic on the other hand is 100% MY car, no ifs ands or butts.. Also I'm confused by your sig, what do you mean you hate people but love gatherings? Magic the gathering??

-2HGEJ6572WH5*****
 
Last edited:
there was a real issue with y2k. and it was averted but only because people in the know did what was neccessary to modify the code in old system that had been around for decades. I work in one of those industries and was well aware of what could have happened if the trouble had not been fixed prior the new year.



The Fix Is In
Most computer programmers agree that it's relatively easy to fix the Y2K glitch. The debate has become primarily focused on how fast we can make the needed repairs.

The doomsayers will tell you the quantity of codes that need to be checked is so large that programmers will never make the deadline. In direct contradiction to these dire projections, a growing number of firms and institutions are reporting that their Y2K efforts are well ahead of schedule. The Federal Aviation Administration, the Pentagon, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Wall Street are all saying they will be done with their repair work Dec 31, 1998.

When it comes to searching for the Y2K bug, I witnessed first hand the process of validating a computer system to see if its Y2K compliant. I work at a military base, and this past May I was absolutely amazed at how quickly an assembled team was able to validate every computer in our department.
 
The Fix Is In
Most computer programmers agree that it's relatively easy to fix the Y2K glitch. The debate has become primarily focused on how fast we can make the needed repairs.

The doomsayers will tell you the quantity of codes that need to be checked is so large that programmers will never make the deadline. In direct contradiction to these dire projections, a growing number of firms and institutions are reporting that their Y2K efforts are well ahead of schedule. The Federal Aviation Administration, the Pentagon, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Wall Street are all saying they will be done with their repair work Dec 31, 1998.

When it comes to searching for the Y2K bug, I witnessed first hand the process of validating a computer system to see if its Y2K compliant. I work at a military base, and this past May I was absolutely amazed at how quickly an assembled team was able to validate every computer in our department.

well of course it was real to those that bought the alarmist BS. and of course disaster was averted by the alarmist bell ringers.

It was real, and it was averted because the code was fixed. You were saying that there wasn't a problem.
 
My dad's older tires on his car had a max PSI rating of 35 while the newer pair that were added on have a max of 44psi.. The OEM tires for the car were Michelin Energy MXV4, max 35psi while the replacement were too Michelin Energy MXV4 but a max of 44psi...

Check out here:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.jsp?make=Michelin&model=Energy+MXV4+S8&tirePageLocQty=

Tire listed at the very bottom:
235/55R18 max psi : 35

You are as useless as the bible thumping chick in the OP. Go back to elementary school, child, and leave the serious business to all of us grown ups.
 
Back
Top