Originally posted by: dirtboy
Originally posted by: LunarRay
The issue was interest rates and the affect they have on the price of homes. I said ''all other things being equal" if rates go up there is less demand for the house then before -fewer folks can meet the income qualification. If an owner wishes to sell his home he has to price it where someone will buy it and if there are fewer folks able at one price more if he lowers the price the more of a market he attracts. So depending on his need he may lower it.
Research house prices in the early 80's when interests rates were 14, 16, 18% on a VARIABLE loan. Prices were up in the LA area. People were still buying.
I'll try again...maybe latin.. Ceteris Paribus... you take all the conditions at play and determine the interest rate had no impact. The same house may have had a greater increase if the rates were lower..
IF you assume every one just popped out of the university you'd be wrong. But, for the sake of argument take a house say the one across the street, all of them an entire development of houses. Say they have 150K$ of wood in the house and the land was sold for an average of 20K$ per lot.. OK... now.. draw a graph with zero to a million along the bottom and quantities along the left margin from one to 100 say.. now then how many will be sold at the million and how many at 10$ ... then tell me about elasticity.
No, I was just assuming you and the other guy posting here, because you seem to have no actual experience with the things you are basing your opinions on.
You said prices will go down when rates go up. Unfortunately, you have not much evidence to prove it other than your little elasticy chart. Too bad it isn't very helpful in this example.
Either you don't understand the term elastic or you were saying houses don't stretch like a rubber band.
If you think that the price of houses will not be affected by the movement of interest rates.. fine.