What origin of life? Has anyone established that there is an origin of life?
Argument from incredulity is a fallacy.
Are you suggesting it's possible there is no origin to life? Well for one piece of minor evidence there exists an origin to my life. My Dad fell in love with my Mom, stuck his dick in her vagina, which is above a butthole and below a peehole, then slimed up it, then my mom pooped me out her cooper. It was excruciating. Then I sucked her tits for nourishment. Maybe the absurd origin of my life is suggestive that life itself had an origin. Merely slightly suggestive.
However, I could go in to explaining how all things are finite and how nothing is infinite. I could begin by making metaphysical statements, which are admittedly weak (but true) arguments. What existed "for Mr" or "for you" before our births? Infinite nothing. Same with death. Outer space... does it end? Or is it infinite nothingness beyond what exists? Yadda yadda.
Nothing... is a state of perfect peace. Nothing is perfect, nothing lasts forever. Birth and death, beginning and end.
That's all very airy fairy philosophy though, isnt it? Many in philosophy these days won't even consider any metaphysical notion. And before you quote physics info explaining how empty space isnt truly nothing, I do consider these metaphysical truths to take precedence to your physics.
It is METAPHYSICS after all.
Anyways the notion of life without origin is idiotic. If you can't see why that is illogical whilst you speak on more complex scientific topics, then I can do nothing but laugh at you regurgitating information you don't truly understand pretending to be smart.
Questioning whether or not life has origin...
Maybe I'm ahead of myself. I should've asked first: what the hell do you mean by suggesting there may be no origin? Am I condescending you whilst misunderstanding what you mean?
Lastly, I made no such fallacy. I merely highlighted that all explanations to the origin od life are ridiculous and absurd. Maybe that implies that I'm suggesting thaylt they may be false based on that notion. But in the end, all I did was point ot that it's absurd. Food for thought is all I provided.
I never stated "that is incomprehensible therefore false". I stated "that is absurd and ridiculous" whilst suggesting that it is perhaps false.
Or, rather, suggesting that it is obviously false. But that's not the bulk of my argukent: I just made a suggestion. I didn't even make a case to be argued: I only suggested.
I didn't make argument, therefore no fallacy is even possible.