Soulchaser
Member
- May 28, 2001
- 197
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Finalnight
Here is the uncensored letter with the story behind it:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/a...2009/0430091jury1.html
And he also was excused from serving on a jury.
Originally posted by: her209
If I were ever to be put on a jury, I'd try to convince the rest of the jury to go for a "guilty" verdict on whatever it is.
Originally posted by: her209
If I were ever to be put on a jury, I'd try to convince the rest of the jury to go for a "guilty" verdict on whatever it is.
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Originally posted by: her209
If I were ever to be put on a jury, I'd try to convince the rest of the jury to go for a "guilty" verdict on whatever it is.
I hope you don't mean that.
Originally posted by: Finalnight
Here is the uncensored letter with the story behind it:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/a...2009/0430091jury1.html
Slye's caustic affidavit, which he prepared with help from his wife Jennifer, can be found below.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Or how great it can be. One of the cop's fathers died that day and he was at the bar with friends who gathered to support him, when a couple assholes made some disparaging comments about the guy because he was crying. These facts were never disputed. They got their ass kicked. If you're not prepared to get your ass kicked, don't make disparaging comments to people at a bar. Implied consent.Originally posted by: Modular
Usually I would agree. But then there's this: Three Chicago Cops found not guiltly in bar brawl
Now granted is wasn't a jury trial, but it just goes to show how fucked our legal system really is.
Originally posted by: tk149
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Or how great it can be. One of the cop's fathers died that day and he was at the bar with friends who gathered to support him, when a couple assholes made some disparaging comments about the guy because he was crying. These facts were never disputed. They got their ass kicked. If you're not prepared to get your ass kicked, don't make disparaging comments to people at a bar. Implied consent.Originally posted by: Modular
Usually I would agree. But then there's this: Three Chicago Cops found not guiltly in bar brawl
Now granted is wasn't a jury trial, but it just goes to show how fucked our legal system really is.
Broken ribs and nose? Other cops showing up, and then leaving without even trying to investigate? That is completely unacceptable. Cops are not above the law, despite what they may believe.
Broken ribs and noses are fairly common injuries in fights, particularly involving participants who are past their 20's when bones, joints, ligaments, tendons, and cartilages are not nearly as resilient as when such participants were mixing it up in their teens or early 20s. And what is there to investigate? Dudes provoked fight, dudes got ass kicked. Not a crime, no matter who is involved.Originally posted by: tk149
Broken ribs and nose? Other cops showing up, and then leaving without even trying to investigate? That is completely unacceptable. Cops are not above the law, despite what they may believe.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Broken ribs and noses are fairly common injuries in fights, particularly involving participants who are past their 20's when bones, joints, ligaments, tendons, and cartilages are not nearly as resilient as when such participants were mixing it up in their teens or early 20s. And what is there to investigate? Dudes provoked fight, dudes got ass kicked. Not a crime, no matter who is involved.Originally posted by: tk149
Broken ribs and nose? Other cops showing up, and then leaving without even trying to investigate? That is completely unacceptable. Cops are not above the law, despite what they may believe.
Originally posted by: richardycc
I sat in an a jury once,it was a drug dealer case. We had to let the guy go, because he used one of those good lawyers that only drug dealer or rich white guy can afford.
Originally posted by: Newbian
I would assign him the longest possible trail I could just for that.
