The problem solves itself. $700 food and drink in SoCal will have $60 in tax, and my sad vulgar self would leave $100.
I here ya about the taxes. Here in NYC, we'd see your $60 on a $700 bill and raise you $2.<sigh> (Though for all I know you were rounding? Our sales tax is 8.875%, though in this particular discussion/context, I will note that most "raw" food - even high-margin "luxury" food - isn't taxed at all, though junk food, broadly speaking, is.) And after I thought about for a few minutes, I realized I'd overstated the comment about the $100. At just below 15%, it would be frowned on (for whatever that's worth), but they would be unlikely to send a dishwasher out ahead of you to slash your car's tires.
Its enough to make you want to vote for Sanders.
Well, certainly if you think that $350 meals shouldn't exist at all, but if there weren't tipping, restaurants would just end up raising prices, though at most of them, probably not all in one fell swoop. I guess the vaguely silver-lining to paying "tips" vs increased prices is that contrary to the opinion of "big spender" types and some, though not all, wait staff, there is no generally accepted convention about tipping on post-tax vs pre-tax totals. On low-moderate tabs, it really doesn't make enough difference to worry about either way, but when you get into $700+ tab territory, it starts turning into at least the modern equivalent of pocket change... And unlike fast food employees or the elderly waiters at your corner diner, wait staff at high end restaurants are quite the opposite of downtrodden, underpaid wage slaves, so as far as I'm concerned, they have no more of a moral claim on my pocket change than I do.
