how much do 'values' matter when you can't eat?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: JacobJ
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: isasir
One of the things in the debates that stuck out to me was Kerry's desire to raise the minimum wage to $8/hr. So while this wasn't a major focus of the elections, this would help alleviate the problem of people feeding themselves (assuming of course they put food high on their priority list of necessities.)

I've come to realize though that a lot of people really just care about themselves (hence "moral values" having such an impact on the election) and as long as these poor people don't harass them for change, they'll just continue on their merry way.

How is raising the minimum wage going to change the poverty level? All that will do is drive up the prices of goods even further. When you raise the minimum wage you raise not just the direct cost of labor to corporations, but all the indirect costs that come with it. You're diluting everyone's earning power.

I have known families that raised 10, 15 kids in a farmhouse on a farmer's widow's income. Yes, money can be tight, or nonexistent. But it's doable. Kids get jobs and contribute to supporting the family. Remember hand-me-downs? I do. My mother's family does. Remember not having a car? Or living in a trailer? Or working menial jobs?

No one has a right to anything in this world beyond the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not happiness, not a leg up, but the right to pursue the paths we choose.
With so many of our goods being manufactured overseas now, I wonder how much it actually would drive up the price of goods...in fact inflation of wages/prices might not be a bad thing considering the sinking price of our dollar...I wonder what various economists have to say on that subject...

but the bottom line is that something is seriously wrong when 12 millions households struggle to eat in the United States of America.

I'm asking for the definition they're giving of "struggle", because I know that it's possible, though never fun, to survive on very, very little money.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

I think a car should cost $200,000,000. What? You can't afford that? Well, people that can't afford to properly compensate the automotive industry deserve to walk.

Why do some of you people seem to think business are some anonymous entities, run by hordes of unfeeling robots, perhaps? Business are run by people. People like you. People like your family. People like your friends. There are not inherently evil or corrupt, no more than people are inherently evil or corrupt.

To simply suggest that all businesses immediately be forced to pay thier employees 2x what they make now and that would "fix" any economic problems "the poor" are having shows an extreme lack of knowledge and naïvety about the workings of the economy. It's not even remotely that easy, and most of you know it.

I :heart: u!
 

AntiEverything

Senior member
Aug 5, 2004
939
0
0
Originally posted by: JacobJ
a few excerpts from the article

The definitions can be elastic and easily blurred, but essentially we're talking about individuals and families that don't have enough money to cover the essentials - food, shelter, clothing, transportation and so forth.)
Transportation? Take the bus.
According to the study: "Most low-income working families do not conform to the popular stereotype of the working poor as young, single, fast-food workers: 88 percent of low-income working families include a parent between 25 and 54 years old. Married couples head 53 percent of these families nationwide. Important jobs such as health aide, janitor and child care worker pay a poverty wage."
My ex-wife's father was a janitor. He spent wisely, saved when he could, and just built himself a nice home in Wisconsin to retire to on a pretty significant nest egg. When we bought our first house, he gave us $6K to help with the down payment. So again, I'd have to see how these people are living before I believe that they can't afford to eat.
The 12 million families represent 11.2 percent of all U.S. households. "At some time during the year," the report said, "these households were uncertain of having, or unable to acquire, enough food for all their members because they had insufficient money or other resources."
It's becoming redundant, but could they not afford to eat because they didn't make enough money, or because they're unwise with the money they do have?
A new study by the Center for an Urban Future, a nonprofit research group, found that more than 550,000 families in New York - a quarter of all working families in the state - had incomes that were too low to cover their basic needs.
Define basic needs. Clothing is a need. Designer clothes are not. Food is a need. Eating like pigs is not. Shelter is a need. Every child having their own bedroom with their own TV is not.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

I think a car should cost $200,000,000. What? You can't afford that? Well, people that can't afford to properly compensate the automotive industry deserve to walk.

Why do some of you people seem to think business are some anonymous entities, run by hordes of unfeeling robots, perhaps? Business are run by people. People like you. People like your family. People like your friends. There are not inherently evil or corrupt, no more than people are inherently evil or corrupt.

To simply suggest that all businesses immediately be forced to pay thier employees 2x what they make now and that would "fix" any economic problems "the poor" are having shows an extreme lack of knowledge and naïvety about the workings of the economy. It's not even remotely that easy, and most of you know it.
I :heart: u!
:p
 

jlmadyson

Platinum Member
Aug 13, 2004
2,201
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".


This is a quite interesting comment. I guess all the min-wagers will be losing their jobs according to your way of thinking. Damn those job providers. More importantly I certainly do not hold any grudge for the company paying me min-wage starting out. I've lived on min-wage it is difficult, but not impossible to better yourself in this society.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

I think a car should cost $200,000,000. What? You can't afford that? Well, people that can't afford to properly compensate the automotive industry deserve to walk.

Why do some of you people seem to think business are some anonymous entities, run by hordes of unfeeling robots, perhaps? Business are run by people. People like you. People like your family. People like your friends. There are not inherently evil or corrupt, no more than people are inherently evil or corrupt.

To simply suggest that all businesses immediately be forced to pay thier employees 2x what they make now and that would "fix" any economic problems "the poor" are having shows an extreme lack of knowledge and naïvety about the workings of the economy. It's not even remotely that easy, and most of you know it.

And don't get me wrong, I'm not just against minimum wage increases. In fact, I think it's about time for another small increase - due to inflation and such. But I just don't believe that the answer to the poverty level in America can be addressed by a simple Federal policy that says "Give everyone more money."
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

I think a car should cost $200,000,000. What? You can't afford that? Well, people that can't afford to properly compensate the automotive industry deserve to walk.

Why do some of you people seem to think business are some anonymous entities, run by hordes of unfeeling robots, perhaps? Business are run by people. People like you. People like your family. People like your friends. There are not inherently evil or corrupt, no more than people are inherently evil or corrupt.

To simply suggest that all businesses immediately be forced to pay thier employees 2x what they make now and that would "fix" any economic problems "the poor" are having shows an extreme lack of knowledge and naïvety about the workings of the economy. It's not even remotely that easy, and most of you know it.

And don't get me wrong, I'm not just against minimum wage increases. In fact, I think it's about time for another small increase - due to inflation and such. But I just don't believe that the answer to the poverty level in America can be addressed by a simple Federal policy that says "Give everyone more money."

I agree, it's not the simple solution to the poverty problem, but our Federal policy right now runs like "We can't afford it. Print more money." :laugh:
 

Ryan

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
27,519
2
81
Originally posted by: BBond
There should be no hungry children in America. Period.

Then make personal finace a required class in high school/middle school.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: JacobJ

but the bottom line is that something is seriously wrong when 12 millions households struggle to eat in the United States of America.

Where have you been? That's the New Proud FLL United States of America.

Either you are with us (Fat Rich and Happy) or against us (Poor SOB's struggling to serve the FLL's).

Enjoy
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JacobJ

but the bottom line is that something is seriously wrong when 12 millions households struggle to eat in the United States of America.

Where have you been? That's the New Proud FLL United States of America.

Either you are with us (Fat Rich and Happy) or against us (Poor SOB's struggling to serve the FLL's).

Enjoy
Yeah JacobJ. This is all new. Didn't know that poverty never existed and that the US was a bright, shining example of everything good and right in the world until Bush came along and drove us to the depths of despair and destruction?

Gawd Bush is such a jerk!

: Dean SCREAM;





/sarcasm
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: BBond
There should be no hungry children in America. Period.

Then make personal finace a required class in high school/middle school.

This is an over simplified answer to a very complex problem.

I don't agree with the tactic of attacking the victims of poverty. Especially when those victims are overwhelmingly children. Most Americans living in poverty don't pass up a meal for that 60" TV people here mention. They don't leave the fridge empty so their kids can play video games. They are working poor. Living on minimum wage trying to raise a family. I don't agree with those people here who suggest there be some sort of financial requrement that must be met to have children either. What ever happened to all that pro-life rhetoric? You want to save the children from abortion, but once they're here you blame them for being poor.

Make up your minds. It's as important to be pro-life after birth as it is before birth.

 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JacobJ

but the bottom line is that something is seriously wrong when 12 millions households struggle to eat in the United States of America.

Where have you been? That's the New Proud FLL United States of America.

Either you are with us (Fat Rich and Happy) or against us (Poor SOB's struggling to serve the FLL's).

Enjoy

Are you always such a generalizing ass?
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

:roll:

So then you couldn't afford to eat either :) What I mean is that your $6 burger is now $9.50


really that sounds like Amazon and Lexmark in my town two of the biggest employers they don't even employ their workers they are whored out temps or "placed" employees that have no retirement and crap or no insurance! And that is After Lexmark shipped most the jobs to Mexico! :(
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: JacobJ

but the bottom line is that something is seriously wrong when 12 millions households struggle to eat in the United States of America.

Where have you been? That's the New Proud FLL United States of America.

Either you are with us (Fat Rich and Happy) or against us (Poor SOB's struggling to serve the FLL's).

Enjoy

Are you always such a generalizing ass?

:shocked:
:laugh:
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Some of you are outright dumb. I have lived on the poverty line before and it's not fun when you can't afford to take the bus to get to work and have to fvcking walk 40min to your first job, 40min to your second job and 1h 15min back home in -45 degree C weather. It's not necessarily by choice.

You want to generalize and view everyone on the poverty level or bellow as some sort of lazy scum then let me ask you this. When are you going to hear the pop? You know. The sound of your head coming out of your ass.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: Aelius
Some of you are outright dumb. I have lived on the poverty line before and it's not fun when you can't afford to take the bus to get to work and have to fvcking walk 40min to your first job, 40min to your second job and 1h 15min back home in -45 degree C weather. It's not necessarily by choice.

You want to generalize and view everyone on the poverty level or bellow as some sort of lazy scum then let me ask you this. When are you going to hear the pop? You know. The sound of your head coming out of your ass.

Very, very few of us view people on or near the poverty line as lazy scum. I come from a mixed background, sharply mixed, of both wealthy and incredibly impoverished people, far lower than the poverty line. I will tell you that I take pride in my family and who they are; their material success in life has no meaning for me in how I value them. That extends to every person I meet, and I realize, after having gotten to know much of my extended family, that so much of life is circumstance, and only so much happens to us as a result of our own efforts.

Our actions, however, are within our control, and we control our purchasing and lifestyle decisions.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: AntiEverything

You don't understand economics, do you. $8/hr would simply put those businesses who pay minimum wage out of business.

Businesses that can't afford to properly compensate their employees deserves to be "Out of Business".

I think a car should cost $200,000,000. What? You can't afford that? Well, people that can't afford to properly compensate the automotive industry deserve to walk.

Why do some of you people seem to think business are some anonymous entities, run by hordes of unfeeling robots, perhaps? Business are run by people. People like you. People like your family. People like your friends. There are not inherently evil or corrupt, no more than people are inherently evil or corrupt.

To simply suggest that all businesses immediately be forced to pay thier employees 2x what they make now and that would "fix" any economic problems "the poor" are having shows an extreme lack of knowledge and naïvety about the workings of the economy. It's not even remotely that easy, and most of you know it.
That was actually a decent post (for an illiterate conservative ;))

The great blessing and great curse of the corporation has, IMHO, always been the seperation of power between those who run the company (CEOs, managers, etc.) and those who own/profit from the company (shareholders).

On the one hand, it allows for specialization of resources (e.g. those who are good at spotting great investment opportunities may not necesssarilly be good at business administration) while on the other hand, it leads outsiders to see the business as a big, faceless blob and forget that there are actual people behind the business.

This also seems to apply to our government--largely seen by its citizens as angry trolls, greedily hoarding giant piles of money. We scream "The government should pay for this" or "The government should pay for that" all the while forgetting that we are the source of the government's funds and that any government spending comes out of all of our pockets.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: AntiEverything
Those people who struggle to eat, I'd be very curious to see the contents of their household. Do they smoke? Drink alochol? Buy lottery tickets? Have stacks of movies and video games for the kiddies?
If you're curious, here might be a good place to start looking.
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: Aelius
Some of you are outright dumb. I have lived on the poverty line before and it's not fun when you can't afford to take the bus to get to work and have to fvcking walk 40min to your first job, 40min to your second job and 1h 15min back home in -45 degree C weather. It's not necessarily by choice.

You want to generalize and view everyone on the poverty level or bellow as some sort of lazy scum then let me ask you this. When are you going to hear the pop? You know. The sound of your head coming out of your ass.

Very, very few of us view people on or near the poverty line as lazy scum. I come from a mixed background, sharply mixed, of both wealthy and incredibly impoverished people, far lower than the poverty line. I will tell you that I take pride in my family and who they are; their material success in life has no meaning for me in how I value them. That extends to every person I meet, and I realize, after having gotten to know much of my extended family, that so much of life is circumstance, and only so much happens to us as a result of our own efforts.

Our actions, however, are within our control, and we control our purchasing and lifestyle decisions.

I agree with the way you view this but some here don't share this point of view.
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Not to generalize, but why is it that all the people I see at the grocery store who pay with WIC or food stamps are generally overweight?

The poor people in this country live like kings compared to the poor around the world.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: X-Man

The poor people in this country live like kings compared to the poor around the world.
I sincerely hope you get the chance someday to live like such a king.


 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: X-Man

The poor people in this country live like kings compared to the poor around the world.
I sincerely hope you get the chance someday to live like such a king.

<shrug>

Fine with me. I would rather be poor in this country, than be a poor person in say, Africa, or Latin America. You've got blinders on if you don't think that this country is amazing.

I'm not saying we're perfect. But I am saying that things could be much worse.