how much better is a X1950XT to a evga 7800GT CO?

Lord Banshee

Golden Member
Sep 8, 2004
1,495
0
0
I was looking on newegg and i seached for the x1950xtx and i see they are still pretty expensive 350-400. Then i notice there was a x1950xt which was 219 NICE :)

Then i start looking for reviews and they seem few, so i was wondering do you guys think it would be worth to upgrade to this card from the 7800gt in my sig to last another year ( i should be done with college in a year woot!! ).

I guess i should list what i would be using the card for,
Vista
AOE3
FPS (hopefully ut2007 and maybe quake wars), but right now just hl2
CAD programs (it seems there are a script to turn these radeons to FireGL for my XP boot)

Thanks
 

nOOky

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2004
3,233
2,290
136
I have the X1950XT and it was quite a difference over my 7900GS, not the best comparison but the best I can do. I would think the difference should be noticable for you, and I surely hope it's fast enough for the next year or so. I also got mine for $219 after rebate which sealed the deal.
 

firewolfsm

Golden Member
Oct 16, 2005
1,848
29
91
I think you should wait. You would get a decent increase, especially at your resolution but once DX10 cards' prices settle they'll be much better. The 8600 series should perform like the X1900XT, maybe slightly better (or worse), but with DX10 support and a lower power consumption.
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
Half a year ago a x1950xt would have been a good upgrade from a 7800gt. Now, with the release of next gen cards coming close, I'd just wait for the newer cards.
 

Lord Banshee

Golden Member
Sep 8, 2004
1,495
0
0
Well sounds like i should wait....

This was to be bought with some of my Tax return so it isn't like i already got it :)

But i don't think i will get a 8600GT as i would see that 128-bit memory interface being an issue at 1920x1200.

So maybe a nice 8900GTS will come out by then and will cost around 350-400 and be as fast as the current GTX. But who knows maybe ATI will have their next gen out the door too or we can only hope.

Thanks again.
 

latino666

Golden Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,103
0
0
Originally posted by: Lord Banshee
Well sounds like i should wait....

This was to be bought with some of my Tax return so it isn't like i already got it :)

But i don't think i will get a 8600GT as i would see that 128-bit memory interface being an issue at 1920x1200.

So maybe a nice 8900GTS will come out by then and will cost around 350-400 and be as fast as the current GTX. But who knows maybe ATI will have their next gen out the door too or we can only hope.

Thanks again.

Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Memory interface isnt a big factor in terms of performance. Its the architecture that matters the most. You can clearly see this in the form of the 7600GT 128bit, beating the 6800ultra all across the board. The 6600GT 128bit outperformed both 9700pro/5950FX ultra, while being toe to toe with the 9800pro.

I agree with what that guy said and he makes a good point

 

yh125d

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2006
6,886
0
76
Originally posted by: latino666
Originally posted by: Lord Banshee
Well sounds like i should wait....

This was to be bought with some of my Tax return so it isn't like i already got it :)

But i don't think i will get a 8600GT as i would see that 128-bit memory interface being an issue at 1920x1200.

So maybe a nice 8900GTS will come out by then and will cost around 350-400 and be as fast as the current GTX. But who knows maybe ATI will have their next gen out the door too or we can only hope.

Thanks again.

Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Memory interface isnt a big factor in terms of performance. Its the architecture that matters the most. You can clearly see this in the form of the 7600GT 128bit, beating the 6800ultra all across the board. The 6600GT 128bit outperformed both 9700pro/5950FX ultra, while being toe to toe with the 9800pro.

I agree with what that guy said and he makes a good point

I still wish my 7600gt was 256bit

/cry
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
My X1900XT performed very close to my 7800GTs in SLI. You'll notice a big difference between the two cards, but if you game at 1920x1200 than the 256MB might limit you.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
7800GS OC > x1950xt should be *significant*

i have a 7800GS OC and a x1950p ... the x1950p IS a more powerful card ... and the xt is still more powerful than the Pro
... and my rig is somewhat CPU-limited, so you should have even *more* of an upgrade

just make *sure* your PS is capable
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
7800GS OC > x1950xt should be *significant*

i have a 7800GS OC and a x1950p ... the x1950p IS a more powerful card ... and the xt is still more powerful than the Pro
... and my rig is somewhat CPU-limited, so you should have even *more* of an upgrade

what are you saying?
7800gs is better than x1950xt?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Why would you buy a x1950xtx when you can buy a 8800GTS 640MB for same price?

I saw one for $339 at newegg today (cheaper even?)

AFAT x1950xt, its the best deal in graphics and will be 2x faster than a 7800GT.