Pepsei
Lifer
- Dec 14, 2001
- 12,895
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: shira
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Jesus can beat up Allah.
Um, Jesus IS Allah.
isn't Allah= the same god who's son is Jesus?
Originally posted by: shira
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Jesus can beat up Allah.
Um, Jesus IS Allah.
Originally posted by: Pepsei
isn't Allah= the same god who's son is Jesus?
Sausage fest :laugh: anything that screws with Christians is great in my book.
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
It's a shame there are no funny conservatives. Wit escapes them.
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: shira
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Jesus can beat up Allah.
Um, Jesus IS Allah.
isn't Allah= the same god who's son is Jesus?
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: shira
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Jesus can beat up Allah.
Um, Jesus IS Allah.
isn't Allah= the same god who's son is Jesus?
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Like I said in the Digg link - how can a RATIONAL conservative person look at this and be disappointed that these people have infected their party?
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Jesus can beat up Allah.
Originally posted by: Rainsford
This is one of the benefits of free speech. Yup, that's right, shirts like these are GOOD. You know why? Because they help identify the complete morons out there without having to do a lot of work. Making or buying these shirts is like stamping "I'm a huge assclown" on your forehead.
Originally posted by: blackangst1
aawww dont like free speech.
Although I would definitely classify it as hate speech, and as a Christian am ashamed of it, it IS protected.
And I dont see where its a McCain shirt. Nice try though.
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Obviously free speech and pathetic can exist in the same room.
This isnt anything new. Just like, if I wanted, which I dont, I can call an african american a n***** or a gay person a qu***
Theres a downside to freedom. But the alternative is worse.
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Obviously free speech and pathetic can exist in the same room.
This isnt anything new. Just like, if I wanted, which I dont, I can call an african american a n***** or a gay person a qu***
Theres a downside to freedom. But the alternative is worse.
It has yet to be proven that spouting hate can be a good thing for a free society. There are plenty of examples showing how it is not...
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Like I said in the Digg link - how can a RATIONAL conservative person look at this and be disappointed that these people have infected their party?
How can a RATIONAL democrat look at ELF, PETA, and opinions on sites like DU, and not be disappointed that they hijack the Democratic party as thier own?
Unfortunatly, you have to align yourself with 1 of 2 parties in this country if you want to have any influence at all.
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Obviously free speech and pathetic can exist in the same room.
This isnt anything new. Just like, if I wanted, which I dont, I can call an african american a n***** or a gay person a qu***
Theres a downside to freedom. But the alternative is worse.
It has yet to be proven that spouting hate can be a good thing for a free society. There are plenty of examples showing how it is not...
If you want government deciding what "hate" is, the UK is the place to be.
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Obviously free speech and pathetic can exist in the same room.
This isnt anything new. Just like, if I wanted, which I dont, I can call an african american a n***** or a gay person a qu***
Theres a downside to freedom. But the alternative is worse.
It has yet to be proven that spouting hate can be a good thing for a free society. There are plenty of examples showing how it is not...
If you want government deciding what "hate" is, the UK is the place to be.
You don't think there's a clear enough understanding of hate?