BurnItDwn
Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 26,353
- 1,862
- 126
Since the left seems to be champions of private property rights in the building of the 'Near Ground Zero' Mosque and are claiming that opposing building it on the grounds that its inappropriate is somehow against the Constitution
I stopped reading after this line. Are you really that fucking stupid? Is building a church or a synagogue appropriate? If so, then building a mosque is appropriate.
I don't like any religion, but, the constitution protects all religions equally. This a very much a black/white issue with no middle ground, no grey. It is absolute in it's simplicity.
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
In other words, people can pick whatever religion they want, no matter how fucked up it is. They can practice where they want too. Making rules about "religion A can have buildings here, but religion B is evil so they can not" is a direct violation of the constitution. No "crazy lefty twisting" required, it's plain English, most 2nd graders could figure this shit out.
Now, if you hate Muslims and don't want them to build their mosque, just say it. But don't spew retarded bullshit about how it's "inappropriate" and that somehow the constitution does not protect them. If they can afford to buy the property, and if it doesn't violate zoning laws, then they can build their silly religious building there as long as they abide by all the building codes.
Last edited:
