Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
GOD! You are so sarcastic!:Q Our troops have done all that, but I guess they don't have the Saddam technique quite right yet?:lips: Still got the car bombs.
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
GOD! You are so sarcastic!:Q Our troops have done all that, but I guess they don't have the Saddam technique quite right yet?:lips: Still got the car bombs.
You're just wrong. While some bad apples did some crazy things like any army it was not sacntioned or ordered by the brass. What I hear from people I trust on the ground is enormous restraint, almost suicidal IMO. For example one time my brother in laws patrol was fired upon by someone in a crowd of about 200 iraqis, they hit two soldiers, now I would have wasted the whole crowd and Saddam would have too. But they showed tremendous disapline by not firing back. They just dispersed and searched hostile crowd to no avail never found shooter..
Originally posted by: dahunan
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
Originally posted by: Davan
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
GOD! You are so sarcastic!:Q Our troops have done all that, but I guess they don't have the Saddam technique quite right yet?:lips: Still got the car bombs.
You're just wrong. While some bad apples did some crazy things like any army it was not sacntioned or ordered by the brass. What I hear from people I trust on the ground is enormous restraint, almost suicidal IMO. For example one time my brother in laws patrol was fired upon by someone in a crowd of about 200 iraqis, they hit two soldiers, now I would have wasted the whole crowd and Saddam would have too. But they showed tremendous disapline by not firing back. They just dispersed and searched hostile crowd to no avail never found shooter..
Pieces of garbage like WHAMPON would say that they were pussies for not shooting, and murderers if they did. Typical kid behind a computer screen.
Originally posted by: Davan
Originally posted by: dahunan
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
If theres one thing youre not qualified to comment on, its reality.
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
You find it irrelevant because you like killing people who never harmed you..
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
You find it irrelevant because you like killing people who never harmed you..
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
You find it irrelevant because you like killing people who never harmed you..
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
I like killing people who never harmed me....that's about the worst thing you could say about someone. I guess I'm a murderer even though I've never harmed so much as a dog in my life.
Tell me again why you made this thread and what the point of it is? Do you just like to ask rhetorical questions?
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
You find it irrelevant because you like killing people who never harmed you..
Make a CHOICE to stay away from any thread I make in the future and you will not be harmed by reality
I like killing people who never harmed me....that's about the worst thing you could say about someone. I guess I'm a murderer even though I've never harmed so much as a dog in my life.
Tell me again why you made this thread and what the point of it is? Do you just like to ask rhetorical questions?
don't tell me my feelings and beliefs are irrelevant and trivial and I won't tell you that I think you are one of the people who still think Saddam and Osama planned 9/11 together.
If you can't figure out why someone makes a thread then THINK LONGER instead of talking trash to them
Originally posted by: dahunan
How many car bombs and suicide bombers attacked Iraq BEFORE we invaded?
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Gee.. maybe we shouldn't have played big bully and attacked a country and people who had NOTHING to do with 9/11
Maybe you should learn to formulate an argument, stop wasting bandwidth by asking random and irrelavant questions, and stop bitching about the same things over and over and over...
What are you sitting behind? You think all kids behave and understand the same things/ways?Originally posted by: DavanTypical kid behind a computer screen.
Originally posted by: ZeboImagine situations like this day in day out.. It's an enormous pressure cooker not knowing who's freind or foe.. not getting your man most of the time..not knowing when the next bomb goes off or sniper lays a beed on you.. This is why even the soldiers who do so-called "cross the line" i think we should forgive... some crack under such psychological pressure. Liberals, for all thier preported understanding of the of human condition never will forgive or excuse. In fact they'lll spit on all of them.
Actually, the UN and quite a few other NGOs were operating throughout Iraq . . . from food to vaccination programs. All were interrupted by Bush War 2003 and then had difficulty resuming during the next two years of pure chaos.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Interesting, although highly irrelevent question.
I don't think we would ever know if there were any attacks since Saddam kept such a tight control on information.
Although I doubt there were any, or maybe a few.
I guess the lesson is that we should use Saddam's tactics and start shooting people on site, gas anyone who opposes us and go door to door and put anyone in jail that we even remotely "feel" is a threat. I am sure a major Saddam like crackdown would end the resistance fight, of course it might result in the deaths of thousands of people, but at least there would be no more car bombs right?
Originally posted by: KlokWyze
Originally posted by: ZeboImagine situations like this day in day out.. It's an enormous pressure cooker not knowing who's freind or foe.. not getting your man most of the time..not knowing when the next bomb goes off or sniper lays a beed on you.. This is why even the soldiers who do so-called "cross the line" i think we should forgive... some crack under such psychological pressure. Liberals, for all thier preported understanding of the of human condition never will forgive or excuse. In fact they'lll spit on all of them.
Excellent point.
This begs the question: Why are we over there anyway? It is such an impossible situation to bring about ANYTHING @ ALL REMOTELY POSITIVE. The occupation is immoral, unjust and unwarranted in the eyes of the world.
We INVADED them. What do you guys think was going to happen? If foreigners come into your home, kill your children, build bases in your backyard and claim they are fighting for your freedom.... well lets just say thats not a very good way to make freinds.
Very puzzling that people even defend these actions. I am ashamed to be an American, but I will do my best spread truth and understanding of the whole situation.