• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How many billions will die in the next 100 years from global warming.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: sao123
I believe that the climate is changing... how much of that change is natural vs how much of it is man cause i think is the debateable subject.

It stands to reason that if it was that way a long time ago (as i bolded in your post)... then we could be returning to that point naturally. Everything is cyclical. Maybe even that is the preferred state of balance, and were just living in a temporary abnormality.

The simple fact remains that every time a super disaster happens, (volcano, meteor, whatever) After every mass exctintion event - BTW these are for more destructive than what man is doing now... the fact that the eart returns to a habital state, is evidence of the self correcting power of the earth.
Sure, Earth self-corrects. But how long does it take to do that? Are we willing to wait 700 generations while the planet gets itself back to our comfort zone? We could dump all of our nuclear, biological, and chemical waste into the oceans, and the planet would eventually get itself back to some semblance of stability. How long might it take though? 100,000 years for the last of the low-level radioactive stuff to decay, and for the heavy metals to sink to the depths, or be otherwise removed from the ecosystem at large?

We seem to want the planet to be comfortable and predictable for every generation now. That's where things become dicey.

It won't be a doom and gloom thing like some (the true "eco-kooks," similar to those whom IGBT obsessively squawks about) are saying. It won't render the planet uninhabitable. Only something like an impact by an object the size of Mars, or perhaps the sun suddenly exploding, would be capable of doing that.
It won't kill billions of people. Some may die because of more severe, unpredictable weather patterns, which can destroy critical crops. Therein lies the problem which I alluded to earlier, being pushed out of our comfort zone of being able to predict weather patterns. Weather that is unexpected can be labeled as "severe." What qualifies as a severe drought in one place may simply qualify as normal in another. Why? Because it's unexpected.


Yes, maybe this is a temporary abnormality. Maybe it's part of a natural swing. Whatever is happening, it may well affect local weather patterns, which affects the people living there. As such, it's in our best interests to learn as much as possible about what really is going on.

I think a more looming problem is scarcity of necessary resources. As long as people continue to reproduce in desert areas where there's enough water, water is going to be a precious resource. Eventually, it's going to lead to some fighting.
 
Originally posted by: DrPizza
I think a more looming problem is scarcity of necessary resources. As long as people continue to reproduce in desert areas where there's not enough water, water is going to be a precious resource. Eventually, it's going to lead to some fighting.
I think you missed an important word there. 😉

Yes, quite possible. Ancient deposits of water won't last forever, since they are no longer replenished by the now-absent rainfall.
I seem to recall that in a southern city recently, I want to say it was in Alabama or Georgia, where they had to shut down a nuclear reactor because the nearby water source it required for cooling was getting dangerously low due to drought.
People complain about gas (and yet will still buy bottled water at an incredibly high price), but really, water is a hell of a lot more vital. The price of bottled water can be at least 1000% higher than that of tap water, and you have to burn gas in order to buy it. It comes packaged in another petroleum-dependent product: polyethylene. Finally, it was delivered to the store by, what else, a truck, burning diesel fuel.


 
Originally posted by: Triumph
A monumental tragedy looms for all of us who are alive today. We are being stalked by a ruthless killer, one that will not kill hundreds, or thousands, tens of thousands, or even millions, within the next 100 years. No, those numbers pale in comparison to the number of people living today who will almost assuredly die within the next 100 years. Most recent estimates point to casualties on a scale heretofore unseen, that almost 6 billion people will die within the century. Never before in human history have this many people died in any single 100 year period. And what is our government doing about it??!?!

Ummm ... there are over 6.7 Billion people on the planet and the world's average life expectancy is about 66 years. So I would say at least 6.7 Billion people will die within the next 66 years probably more.

So I have 10.4% more people dieing in 34% less time ... we are doomed.

I would even venture to guess that 9 or 10 billion will die in the hundred year period after this one.
 
Originally posted by: pyonir
I voted for the end of humanity. because that's as ridiculous as this thread.


Your new president and Hillary don't share your views Watch his speech. Nice tinfoil hats their wearing . Looks good on them . As coastal waters rise fertile farmland willbe under water. We already have food shortages. Billions will die.

 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: pyonir
I voted for the end of humanity. because that's as ridiculous as this thread.


Your new president and Hillary don't share your views Watch his speech. Nice tinfoil hats their wearing . Looks good on them . As coastal waters rise fertile farmland willbe under water. We already have food shortages. Billions will die.

Troll elsewhere, troll.
 
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: pyonir
I voted for the end of humanity. because that's as ridiculous as this thread.


Your new president and Hillary don't share your views Watch his speech. Nice tinfoil hats their wearing . Looks good on them . As coastal waters rise fertile farmland willbe under water. We already have food shortages. Billions will die.

OH MY GAWD WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!!!!
 
So...wait....there are people who think the millions if not billions of tons of carbon we're shooting into the atmosphere are harmless?
 
Originally posted by: ICRS
Watch an inconvienent truth. The temperature of the earth is rising due to human intervention. Crops around the world are failing because they can no longer withstand the harsh climent being induced by humans. People are all ready starving to death due to global warming. Also notice the increase in hurricanes, all of this can be pin pointed to human caused global warming.

You'd get a better idea of what is happening with the global climate watching the breast exam channel.
 
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
So...wait....there are people who think the millions if not billions of tons of carbon we're shooting into the atmosphere are harmless?

Yessir! Right here.

Ever seen a volcano? One decent eruption from one of any of the 10,000 or so active ones on the planet releases more greenhouse gases than all of humanity does in a year. Also, it's not just CO2, which is really a pretty weak greenhouse gas.

Also, the average global temperature has FALLEN for the past decade.

Also, it is clear we are in an interglacial period of the CURRENT ICE AGE.

Also, people PROFIT from scaring you. It appears to be working too. A good cure for the heebie jeebies though, is to USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN, rather than resign yourself to the fact the planet is dying because some ditz on the news, who can't spell climate ,told you so.

Please go take physical geography, Everybody.
 
Originally posted by: Oceandevi
I predict that over 6 billion people will die of something in the next 100 years.

I predict you are dead wrong on this. Serious, no joke. No small print. No tricks.
 
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
0

/thread

The fact that the OP didn't even include 0 is embarrassing. How the fuck do you even die from 'global warming'?

[A highway, bumper to bumper traffic on the way out. A lot of drivers beep their horns hoping other drivers in front of them start moving]

Randy: [beeping his own horn] Come onnn, come on!
Sharon: It's useless. This traffic isn't moving!
Stan: Dad, isn't it possible the flood wasn't caused by global warming? I, I mean, the water was held back by a giant beaver dam, after all.
Randy: No, Stan, I'm afraid us adults just let you children down. We didn't take care of our earth, and now you've inherited our problems.
Driver: We didn't listen!
Randy: [hears this and rolls down his window] Weh, we didn't listen! [rolls up his window] Come on! Everyone grab what you can! We have to walk!

[the Marshes get out the car, carrying what they can, and leave the highway. In town the looting continues. An elderly man carrying a TV comes into view...]

Man 7: [drops the TV and points] Oh Jesus, here it comes!
Man 8: Global warming! [everyone runs away from whatever the man was pointing to, and soon the street is empty.]
Man 9: [in the middle of the crowd] It's coming! Here comes global warming!
Man 10: We didn't listen!
[a camera in the sky begins to act the part of Global Warming as it focuses on a man and zooms in on him. The man turns and freezes in his tracks. The POV changes to a camera on the sidewalk watching the man's reactions. The man turns over a few times and stops moving, but no other camera is seen]

Randy: [moving along with his family] Come on, hurry! [the panicking crowd overtakes them]
Man 11: It's right behind us!

[the Marshes stop to let the crowd through, then start moving again. The crowd returns and passes them again in the opposite direction] It's coming the other way! [the Marshes stop, then run back the way they came]

Randy: Go back, go back!!
 
Originally posted by: ICRS
How many billions will parish due to global warming in the next 100 years?

when you say parish, are you referring to a county in Louisiana or something to do with a church?


And billions of what? billions of ice worms?

 
Originally posted by: SphinxnihpS
Originally posted by: Oceandevi
I predict that over 6 billion people will die of something in the next 100 years.

I predict you are dead wrong on this. Serious, no joke. No small print. No tricks.

I will bet you 1 billion pesos I am right.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
well 100 years is 9 billion...
so we will have plenty to spare if many die.

only 9 billion? At what point do we double every 100 years?
Or can we even feed that amount of people.
 
Originally posted by: Oceandevi
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
well 100 years is 9 billion...
so we will have plenty to spare if many die.

only 9 billion? At what point do we double every 100 years?
Or can we even feed that amount of people.

hm maybe thats 50 years then, but still. even more to spare!
 
Back
Top