How Long Before The Sleeping Sheeple Finally Wake Up?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

How Long Before The Levee Breaks?

  • Hard To Predict At This Time But Feel It's Inevitable

  • A Few Weeks

  • A Few Months

  • Around 6 Months

  • Around A Year

  • Around 2 Years

  • Before The Next Election In 2016

  • After The Next Election In 2016

  • 5 Years Or More Away (please specify further)

  • Never


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
As was pointed out before, a lot of violent crime indicators are not properly reported in the first place, or deliberately skewed and under reported or mischaracterized for a myriad number of reasons, such as to make a large city more appealing to keep and attract business and keep the property values higher.

What about the added violent crime statistics when law enforcement initiates it (like during no knock warrants) when they intentionally brutalize and even murder often innocent people they happen to come across? I would imagine all those violent law enforcement incidents are not going to be added to the local violent crime stats, because then the police and the feds would be actually driving the violent crime stats way up, not down. So you can certainly bet that all those police initiated violent crime stats are not going to be properly reported and mischaracterized.


Now you get to provide documented proof that there is a multi year pattern of deliberate skewing and under reporting, etc. and that it happens on a consistent basis and on a large enough scale to actually affect the overall statistics in a meaningful way.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Since none of us were there, it's all just idle scientific speculation on how it was formed. There has been so much going on geologically and environmentally in the hundreds of millions (or billions) of years since it was formed, that nobody will ever be able to say with certainty what lead to it's formation. Obviously a geologic scientist can't even accurately predict an earthquake or a volcanic eruption, either.

So, the crime statistics are all wrong cause, 'the man' is trying to hide the awful truth. Now the geologists are all wrong.

So, any thoughts on Sasquatch? Real, right?
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
The news "source" it happened to be posted on, should not completely discredit the actual "source" of the story, who happened to be a police officer working on the NY PD. He probably first tried to get his story posted at the NY Times, and they refused it for political reasons. Imagine that.

I'm sure you are also blissfully unaware that the MSM is also completely controlled by a small handful of businesses and owners and it has become mostly a mouthpiece for only politically preapproved propaganda. Or didn't you get the memo to shut your mouth and stop posting that Rupert Murdoch sent you?

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

on an Iranian internet blog....

That ain't documentation sonny. That's simply wishful thinking.

And I know exactly who owns the main stream media, and haven't trusted them for probably longer than you've been alive.

As for Murdoch, I happen to believe that he's simply a waste of human flesh so I doubt that I'll be paying attention to any memos that he might be sending out.

Now about Sasquatch....
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

on an Iranian internet blog....

That ain't documentation sonny. That's simply wishful thinking.

And I know exactly who owns the main stream media, and haven't trusted them for probably longer than you've been alive.

As for Murdoch, I happen to believe that he's simply a waste of human flesh so I doubt that I'll be paying attention to any memos that he might be sending out.

Now about Sasquatch....

You vastly undermine your many failed attempts at using disinfo by using bro, sonny, and the old stand by of "I'm older than you and Moses, so of course I'm right", just to try to get the upper hand and belittle your opponents.

Here's your Sasquatch for you, if you can stomach the "source", which was randomly pulled off Google if you'd like to complain about it:

http://www.examiner.com/article/wit...-is-america-looking-at-a-fool-me-twice-moment

bigfoot-diptych_full_600.jpg
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
You vastly undermine your many failed attempts at using disinfo by using bro, sonny, and the old stand by of "I'm older than you and Moses, so of course I'm right", just to try to get the upper hand and belittle your opponents.

That word does not mean what you seem to think it does.

And, as for the bro, sonny, etc., perhaps you can explain the difference between what I just did and what you were doing with your 'being silenced by Murdoch' and the 'bet you don't know who owns the media', etc.

"so of course I'm right", just to try to get the upper hand and belittle your opponents." cuts both ways.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
That word does not mean what you seem to think it does.

And, as for the bro, sonny, etc., perhaps you can explain the difference between what I just did and what you were doing with your 'being silenced by Murdoch' and the 'bet you don't know who owns the media', etc.

"so of course I'm right", just to try to get the upper hand and belittle your opponents." cuts both ways.

Ahh, so now you are also trying to infer I don't know what words mean and stuff, when you are completely clueless what I know and don't know. And as a bonus, even though you started the juvenile belittling demeanor, I am now suddenly guilty of doing it to you, too. And as a double bonus, you are also intent on getting the last word in, as if that automatically makes you right. Does that about sum it all up in a nut shell, grandpa Moses?

Disinformation (disinfo) is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.
Unlike traditional propaganda techniques designed to engage emotional support, disinformation is designed to manipulate the audience at the rational level by either discrediting conflicting information or supporting false conclusions. A common disinformation tactic is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).
Another technique of concealing facts, or censorship, is also used if the group can affect such control. When channels of information cannot be completely closed, they can be rendered useless by filling them with disinformation, effectively lowering their signal-to-noise ratio and discrediting the opposition by association with many easily disproved false claims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation

Yea, pretty sure I used it right there, Sasquatch.
 
Last edited:

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Not worth the effort. Enjoy your conspiracies.

I bet you would be absolutely thrilled to have a chance to tell Edward Snowden that, too.

A conspiracy is no longer a conspiracy when facts finally prove otherwise. The problem is, all those stubborn people like you out there who have already completely made up their minds about something based on emotion, business, politics and religion. So you calling me bro and sonny boy, and comparing your presumed elderly age and thus greater wisdom to mine, and then bringing up Sasquatch, shows a definite emotional response on your part, not a rational one.

And I have also found that belligerently stubborn people can almost never be convinced otherwise even with facts, unless they personally might benefit from it somehow. Then you will see them change their intractable and wrong positions in a heartbeat. Which is why we all get the amazingly shoddy government and business practices we must so richly deserve.

It's unfortunate that so many people are so falsely proud and arrogant that they will literally go to their graves without admitting they are wrong about something significant, like concerning family issues, even when the truth about their errors is staring them in the face and they stubbornly refuse to admit it.
 
Last edited:

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
I thought this might be relevant as an update posted here:

Yellowstone Volcano Eruption: Report Claims That US Has Contingency Deal With Brazil, Australia

yellowstone-volcano-sa.jpg


If the Yellowstone supervolcano erupts then millions of U.S. citizens could end up in Brazil, Australia, or Argentina.

That’s according to the South African news website Praag, which said that the African National Congress was offered $10 billion a year for 10 years if it would build temporary housing for Americans in case of an eruption.

The potential eruption of the supervolcano, one of the biggest in the world, has been a hot topic ever since videos of animals allegedly fleeing the area before an earthquake were posted online. Although the veracity of the claims haven’t been backed up, dozens of bloggers and others have been trying to figure out what, if anything, is going on.

One of the latest theories is that the U.S. Geological Service and its partners, which keep an eye on the caldera, are hiding data from the public.

The Praag article says that the South African government fears that placing so many Americans in South Africa could dramatically change the country.

“South Africa will not be part of the plan, because there is a risk that millions of white Americans could be sent to South Africa in an emergency situation and that this would pose a risk to black national culture identity,” Dr. Siph Matwetwe, spokesman for the Department of Foreign Affairs, is quoted as saying.

“We have our own challenges, even if there is enough housing and infrastructure available, it will destabilize the country and may even bring back apartheid.”

The gigantic volcano in Yellowstone has erupted three times over the last two million years, covering a huge area of surrounding land. Maps from educational institutions and government officials project that up to 17 states could be fully or partially impacted if the volcano erupted again. The far south of Canada could also get hit, as well as the far north of Mexico.

Scientists aren’t sure when it will erupt next, although many have sought to assure the public that it probably won’t for a while. In reality, the volcano could erupt at any time, though officials would in theory be able to detect an impending eruption and alert Americans to the threat.
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/662...s-has-contingency-deal-with-brazil-australia/

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fpraag.co.za%2F%3Fp%3D23549&edit-text=&act=url

File this tidbit under: Things that make you go Hmmm....

I also found the comments an interesting read.


And this also makes me wonder about a lot of other seemingly disconnected news items that might be related to this inevitable volcanic event if you were aware it was coming and you were trying to connect the dots right back to it.

Such as the notable rise in internet clatter from allegedly unnamed sources high in the government that some sort of national disaster might take place soon. Yet the disaster news bloggers never seem to really nail down what the cause of that natural or man made disaster might be that is supposedly looming menacingly on the horizon.

Not to mention the fact that at least one high ranking government official has also admitted as much, and did so without spilling the beans about any crucial details, like what that natural disaster might actually be they are preparing for.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...s-cyber-attackunprecedented-natural-disaster/

... and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way. So prepare, and bring “a large bottle of Advil.”
Meanwhile, I also found this interesting and possibly relevant. It's a natural disaster hotspots report from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University.

The most obvious glaring omission I can find in this highly detailed global hazard report is relevant geological data relating to the Yellowstone super volcano is noticeably missing from this hazard report under volcanic threat assessments, except for possibly the first earthquake assessment. Surely The World Bank and Columbia University would not have simply overlooked or neglected to add natural disaster hazard assessments about the Yellowstone Super Volcano unless they were advised by someone higher up the food chain to remove or not include Yellowstone data in their otherwise detailed global natural hazard assessment report.

http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc05/papers/pap2325.pdf
 
Last edited:

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Poll: How Long Before The Levee Breaks?

Or, How long before the "Shit Finally Hits the Fan?"

I bet a lot of Rich Religious Republicans thought I made this thread.

I've been posting about "The Tipping Point" in the U.S. coming since at least 2003.

Anyway the Feds know it is close and preparations have already been made and done.

Underground bunkers for the Elite with a shit ton of food are stored.

Although Con Agara has not yet fullfilled all of the orders for the long term food storage.

Citizenry with weapons documented and ready to be targeted.

I've been part of the preparations but not rich or Elite so I do not have a spot secured underground. Not sure I would want one anyway. What kind of life would that be?

Many of the U.S. rich know it's coming fast and have been selling and/or burning their McMansions down or fleeing to other Countries.

The exact date depends on many factors coming together or one event that triggers the Domino effect into full out Chaos, Revolution and War.

It could be on purpose such as WWIII, could be a large scale natural disaster such as Yellowstone eruption or simply enough people losing cheap access to Netflix.

Time will tell.

Good luck to all especially the rich that brought this on.
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86

Heh
That reminded me of a Saskquatch sighting near where I live a little while ago
I just looked it up, watched the video a couple of times
I'm pretty sure I know exactly what the Saskquatch really is, but no one in the comments has it figured
Let's see if anyone can figure it out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkAWMi86wIQ

The Craven Bigfoot Footage

edit- Nope it's not Chuck Testa
 
Last edited:

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
Is this about "the wall coming down"?

And, since we know it's a wall, why not reinforce it or safely demolish it, since we know it is weak?? Why wait for it to come down? Take it down, or just fix it.

I can recommend a few contractors - they are good. None of them use illegal labor either,.. since they were once illegal labor (when they 1st came to this country) and refuse to use undocumented workers.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
Slicksnake is bonafide off his rocker but at the same time there is a total lack of preparedness among the just-in-time reliant average dolt as well. All anyone needs is some 1950's boyscout advice... be prepared. Nothing more and nothing less.
 

Rakehellion

Lifer
Jan 15, 2013
12,181
35
91
Don't you just love posters like yourself and others who make unsubstantiated statements they can't back up because they stubbornly refuse to click on the links already provided to them that will disprove their posts and opinions before they even post? I know I do.


You have crime data from two years. Neither of which are this year.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
As far as you go, most people ask themselves "Is he sane"

Most seem to not think so.

The fact is that most people here are not getting paid under the table as a trolling stooge and a shill just to insult other posters they might not agree with.
 
Last edited:

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Slicksnake is bonafide off his rocker but at the same time there is a total lack of preparedness among the just-in-time reliant average dolt as well. All anyone needs is some 1950's boyscout advice... be prepared. Nothing more and nothing less.

At least you actually contributed to the topic. And I don't even have a rocker, so I guess I'm off it all right.
 
Last edited:

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/congress-learns-emp-could-kill-90-of.html

Yesterday Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee held a hearing about the potential impact of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) bomb over America.

An EMP is caused by the detonation of a high-altitude nuclear bomb which sends a massive surge that fries anything electrical. It destroys anything with a microchip, the entire electric grid, and all vehicles built after the mid-1980s.

McCaul opened the hearing entitled, "Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP): Threat to Critical Infrastructure," saying an EMP would be far more catastrophic than even ground-level nuclear bombs. (watch video below)

"Some would say it’s low probability, but the damage that could be caused in the event of an EMP attack, both by the sun, a solar event, or a man-made attack, would be catastrophic," said McCaul. "We talk a lot about a nuclear bomb in Manhattan, and cybersecurity threat to the power grid in the Northeast, and all of these things would actually probably pale in comparison to the devastation that an EMP attack could perpetrate on Americans."

Dr. Peter Pry, a member of the Congressional EMP Commission, testified that an EMP event whether from a rogue state or the sun could wipe out 90% of America’s population.

"Natural EMP from a geomagnetic super-storm, like the 1859 Carrington Event or 1921 Railroad Storm, and nuclear EMP attack from terrorists or rogue states, as practiced by North Korea during the nuclear crisis of 2013, are both existential threats that could kill 9 of 10 Americans through starvation, disease, and societal collapse," Pry told the committee.

The purpose of the hearing was to advance H.R. 3410 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to secure critical infrastructure against electromagnetic pulses, and for other purposes.

The general aim of the resolution is to appropriate funding to research "a comprehensive plan to protect and prepare the critical infrastructure of the American homeland against EMP events."

And please don't hesitate to point out again how bat shit crazy I am, you politically correct trollys. Because obviously I'm just making all these possible disaster scenarios up completely out of thin air with no rational basis for them at all.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/05/17/363020/new-study-were-all-conspiracy-theorists-now/

Are people who think 9/11 was an inside job suffering from pathological delusions?

That is what the mainstream media tell us. But a recent study published in Frontiers of Psychology suggests the contrary. It found that 29 of 30 research subjects - 97% of the sample - turned out to be "9/11 conspiracy theorists." And it concluded that questioning the official version of 9/11, and constructing an alternative explanation, is a sign of psychological health.

The article's title "Thirty shades of truth: conspiracy theories as stories of individuation, not of pathological delusion" summarizes its key finding: People who doubt the mainstream media's version of 9/11 are not deluded. Quite the opposite: They are notable for "individuation," a term coined by Carl Jung which he defined as: "The better and more complete fulfillment of the collective qualities of the human being."

Are 9/11 truthers and other independent-minded skeptics really better and more fulfilled human beings? That is the exact opposite of what mainstream propaganda has been telling us.

Take that all you PC nutters, delusional trolls, and paid shills. :colbert:
 
Last edited: