ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 31,298
- 13,085
- 136
Lol no he’s saying brycejones was being sarcastic.It's not in the Constitution. Sorry I confused you with more in formation than that.
Lol no he’s saying brycejones was being sarcastic.It's not in the Constitution. Sorry I confused you with more in formation than that.
Wow, sorry, it took a couple minutes. Then I reread the post I was responding to. Is it 4:20 yet.It's not in the Constitution. Sorry I confused you with more in formation than that.
Pretty sure he just forgot to put in the /sI almost missed that. I was like wow, that’s quite the miss for brycejones.
I already smacked my forehead a few times.Lol no he’s saying brycejones was being sarcastic.
Brah, it's been 4:20 for 3 days already.Wow, sorry, it took a couple minutes. Then I reread the post I was responding to. Is it 4:20 yet.
Right. I'm biased and you're not....Democrats tried to do it because the courts said it was okay when Republicans do it. Rules only apply to Democrats once again. Your takeaway is biased as usual.
But should it be done? I say no, regardless of party.
Sure, but Republicans are doing it and the courts are approving it, while simultaneously rejecting Democrats when they do it. You don't see a problem with that?Right. I'm biased and you're not....
Nowhere did I say that it was OK for the Republicans to do it.
You didn’t exactly lead with that opinion…….Nowhere did I say that it was OK for the Republicans to do it.
At the federal level? If yes, then I’ve been advocating that for a while now as have others on this board. The people clearly aren’t being represented right now.I would support going back to the original counting on the house. more districts means that more people are directly represented and will have more sway over the person and their positions. is there any group advocating for that change right now?
what ! have heard a lot here is making the senate proportional and getting rid of the EC, and I will never support that.At the federal level? If yes, then I’ve been advocating that for a while now as have others on this board. The people clearly aren’t being represented right now.
Why do you oppose changes to the Senate and the EC?what ! have heard a lot here is making the senate proportional and getting rid of the EC, and I will never support that.
a larger house would be more as the system was meant to be though.
I support expanding the house, not the senate. The senate was designed to slow things down. I do however think the filibuster should ended.what ! have heard a lot here is making the senate proportional and getting rid of the EC, and I will never support that.
a larger house would be more as the system was meant to be though.
Maine and Nebraska already have proportional EC delegates, need moreThere's no way the Republicans will go for removing the EC. It would result in them not wining the Presidency again. Since it would take an amendment to remove the EC, it's not going to pass without their support. The work around though is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, though I can see that being challenged and stuck down by the current SC.
democrats would rather not have this, it opens it up too much to 3rd parties. neither R or D want more than the 2 parties to ever be viable. its a big problem in our system. things like the pres. debate commission for instance. if any other party gets even close, they move the goal posts.Maine and Nebraska already have proportional EC delegates, need more
![]()
Which States Split Their Electoral Votes? - Electoral Vote Map
Which states split their electoral votes? Most states allocate electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis, but Maine and Nebraska are different.electoralvotemap.com
I disagree and Bernie sanders says hi.democrats would rather not have this, it opens it up too much to 3rd parties. neither R or D want more than the 2 parties to ever be viable. its a big problem in our system. things like the pres. debate commission for instance. if any other party gets even close, they move the goal posts.
I am for proportional Ec delegates and ranked choice voting.
Silly example, given that Sanders was a one-off independent that had to switch D to be taken seriously.I disagree and Bernie sanders says hi.
One of many.I would support going back to the original counting on the house. more districts means that more people are directly represented and will have more sway over the person and their positions. is there any group advocating for that change right now?
I do agree with ranked choice and I’m pretty sure some democratic states are already doing that so again, I disagree that democrats only want two parties.Silly example, given that Sanders was a one-off independent that had to switch D to be taken seriously.
Ranked choice is the answer.
This only works if all 50 states do it. Can't have California split its EC votes 60/40 while Texas sends all Rs.Maine and Nebraska already have proportional EC delegates, need more
![]()
Which States Split Their Electoral Votes? - Electoral Vote Map
Which states split their electoral votes? Most states allocate electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis, but Maine and Nebraska are different.electoralvotemap.com