Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: Ballatician
Originally posted by: XMan
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: waggy
i think to many look for a reason to call others racist.
I think clueless, self-satisified white guys who have not experienced determined, pervasive and often explicit racism themselves from cops, real estate agents, loud mouthed good ol' boys, mortgage lenders, white g/f's mommas and random other people who can and do cross the street at their approach continue to keep their collective heads up their asses when dealing with the not unreasonable continuing sensitivity of black people to race.
OK, but if that's the case, don't you think that treating the white guys who really could care less if people are fuschia or black or have three eyes like crap is creating a self-fulfilling prophecy?
If they really didn't care then why was him being black used as the only identifier? I'm sure he as some other characteristics.
Deliberately avoiding a prominent distinguishing characteristic seems an awful lot like caring.
When I bought my car, I didn't care that it was red. I still don't care that it's red. But when I describe it, I say that it's a red coupe. Why? Because the color is an easily-visible distinguishing feature.
I have a friend who has very long hair (down to her waist). I don't care how long her hair is, but when I describe her, I say that she's the girl with the very long hair. Why? Because the long hair is an easily-visible distinguishing feature.
Describing someone as "black" is no different than describing someone as "bald", "pale", "freckled", "tall", "short", or "red-headed". It's just a physical characteristic that is likely to help jog someone's memory.
That said, Perk is spot-on about trying to understand the other person's viewpoint and repairing the unintended slight.
ZV