How is Mr Obama destroying the US?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
that's not what a moral nation does.

Because of the thinking of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives, good leaders are forced to fight wars in a way that is not correct.

The most merciful way to fight a war is with maximum destruction in the shortest time possible.

It's the same way in a street fight.

If you aren't going to do it that way, don't do it at all.
 

colonel

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2001
1,786
21
81
you should it be on trial for treason to your motherland for "wishing" your president a dark future.
 

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
Because of the thinking of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives, good leaders are forced to fight wars in a way that is not correct.

The most merciful way to fight a war is with maximum destruction in the shortest time possible.

It's the same way in a street fight.

If you aren't going to do it that way, don't do it at all.

Wait, what?

Did you just compare complex global issues to a brawl in the street? Your effective solution to the problem is to basically nuke everybody?

Really?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
1. Would Jesus have killed innocent people with a ball of fire from heaven shortly after 9/11 as you propose the USA should have done?
How do I know Jesus would approve of this solution? Because that's what I would do if it were my decision.

So if you decided to anally rape little boys with duct-taped hamsters wrapped in sandpaper, does that mean that Jesus would approve of that too?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Because of the thinking of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives, good leaders are forced to fight wars in a way that is not correct.

The most merciful way to fight a war is with maximum destruction in the shortest time possible.


It's the same way in a street fight.

If you aren't going to do it that way, don't do it at all.

Who exactly determined that this is the "correct" way to fight a war, and what exactly gives them the authority to determine "correctness"?
 

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
Wait, what?

Did you just compare complex global issues to a brawl in the street? Your effective solution to the problem is to basically nuke everybody?

Really?

Did you miss the "don't do it" part of my answer?


So if you decided to anally rape little boys with duct-taped hamsters wrapped in sandpaper, does that mean that Jesus would approve of that too?

You sir, are a hideous trouble maker.

Wait. Are you a U.S. Citizen?

Yes.

Who exactly determined that this is the "correct" way to fight a war?

God.
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,710
136
Because of the thinking of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives, good leaders are forced to fight wars in a way that is not correct.

The most merciful way to fight a war is with maximum destruction in the shortest time possible.

It's the same way in a street fight.

If you aren't going to do it that way, don't do it at all.

that's how the Romans fought and we all know how that ended.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
You sir, are a hideous trouble maker.
No, I was just trying to illustrate to you this fact: Your logic is circular. You purport to live your life like Jesus did. Then you say that because you are doing that, anything you decide (in this case killing 50,000+ innocent people) would be acceptable to Jesus during his life. That does not compute with me (nor should it with anyone).

Hence my question about anally raping little boys with duct-taped hamsters wrapped in sandpaper. It was designed to take your argument to the extreme to show you the fallacy of your argument. Obviously Jesus wouldn't approve of that. But if you decided to do that, your logic would say that he would agree with your decision, and approve of that.

You need to discard this false logic, as it's just leading you astray. Either live your life like Jesus did, or don't. Don't try and play both sides off the middle.

Personally, I think you are just too weak to admit to yourself that your thoughts/reasoning/suggested actions are NOT anywhere close to what Jesus would have done. But that's just my guess.

If you are a US Citizen, why do you want our President (and therefore, likely, our country) to fail? Please be specific and give lots of examples.

When? Where? Who did he tell?
 
Last edited:

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
No, I was just trying to illustrate to you this fact: Your logic is circular. You purport to live your life like Jesus did. Then you say that because you are doing that, anything you decide (in this case killing 50,000+ innocent people) would be acceptable to Jesus during his life.

If you have read any of my posting history, you would know that I discount the use of logic when seeking truth. Remember that the mission of my brother, Jesus, was different than my mission.
If you are a US Citizen, why do you want our President (and therefore, likely, our country) to fail? Please be specific and give lots of examples.

I want the policies that obama advocates to fail. Example, universal health care.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
If you have read any of my posting history, you would know that I discount the use of logic when seeking truth. Remember that the mission of my brother, Jesus, was different than my mission.


I want the policies that obama advocates to fail. Example, universal health care.

What was Jesus' mission? Be specific.

What is your mission? Be specific.

Where and when did God decide that "The most merciful way to fight a war is with maximum destruction in the shortest time possible", and who did he tell? Be specific.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
I want the policies that obama advocates to fail. Example, universal health care.

Why would you deny healthcare to the poor, based on their inability to pay?

The bible's take on how we should treat the poor: http://www.zompist.com/meetthepoor.html
Lev. 19:19ff. Now when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very corners of your field, neither shall you gather the gleanings of your harvest. Nor shall you glean your vineyard, nor shall you gather the fallen fruit of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the needy and for the stranger. I am the LORD your God.

Deut. 15:7. If there is a poor man among you, one of your brothers, in any of the towns of the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart, nor close your hand to your poor brother; but you shall freely open your hand to him, and generously lend him sufficient for his need in whatever he lacks.

Prov. 19:17. He who is gracious to a poor man lends to the LORD, and He will repay him for his good deed.

Prov. 14:31. He who oppresses the poor reproaches his Maker, but he who is gracious to the needy honors Him.
 
Last edited:

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
What was Jesus' mission? Be specific.

What is your mission? Be specific.

Jesus' mission was to go to the Cross and become King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

My mission is to be that King and Lord and to speak the good news.

There is much I can't say here because I have been ordered not to proselytize.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
Under our plan, the missiles would have been targeted at Baghdad. The goal being to complete level and destroy all property within the City limits.
The tragedy of war is the necessity to kill good and the heathens. Are you saying no innocent people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were any innocent people saved as a result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Which Nation's innocents were saved?
Think about it.
Another devotee of Arnaud-Amaury? Be careful in your assumption that a God of Love would claim your soul as his...