How is Mr Obama destroying the US?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
Like the Medicare prescription drug bill? Illegal wiretapping? No child left behind?

The Medicare bill was a bone we threw to shut you old farts up. Didn't work. Wiretapping is to keep you safe. Did work. No child left behind is a continuation of a very bad policy, government sponsered schooling. If we had our way, we would eliminate all government involvement in schooling.


Like the never ending "war" in Iraq? What heritage have you taught your fellow Americans exactly?

A war would have been unnecessary but for the weakness of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives. Our solution was to use intercontinental missiles carrying nuclear warheads on the afternoon of 9/11.
 
Last edited:

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
The Medicare bill was a bone we threw to you to shut you old farts up. Didn't work. Wiretapping is to keep you safe. Did work. No child left behind is a continuation of a very bad policy, government sponsered schooling. If we had our way, we would eliminate all government involvement in schooling.




A war would have been unnecessary but for the weakness of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives. Our solution was to use intercontinental missiles carrying nuclear warheads on the afternoon of 9/11.

duuuude... dan brown is going to put you in his next novel if you aren't careful...
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
While speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama mispronounced the word "Corpsman" as "corpse-man.

3x! From a teleprompter!

There shouldn't be a national prayer breakfast in the first place.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
A war would have been unnecessary but for the weakness of Liberals/Democrats/Heathens and Progressives. Our solution was to use intercontinental missiles carrying nuclear warheads on the afternoon of 9/11.

How very churchy of you to propose killing of (mostly, lets say 95%) innocents in order to hit a minority of "bad guys" (other 5%). Is that what Jesus would do? Kill innocents by the thousands with a magical fireball from heaven?

Also, I'd like to know where exactly these nuclear missiles were going to be targeted at?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Obama was in a place that offered prayer to God on-behalf of the United States of America.

That was the single greatest positive event for this Nation this year.

Doesn't matter where it's held. It should not be a government function in any way, shape, or form.
 

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
How very churchy of you to propose killing of (mostly, lets say 95%) innocents in order to hit a minority of "bad guys" (other 5%). Is that what Jesus would do? Kill innocents by the thousands with a magical fireball from heaven?

Also, I'd like to know where exactly these nuclear missiles were going to be targeted at?

Under our plan, the missiles would have been targeted at Baghdad. The goal being to complete level and destroy all property within the City limits.

The tragedy of war is the necessity to kill good and the heathens. Are you saying no innocent people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were any innocent people saved as a result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Which Nation's innocents were saved?

Think about it.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Judging from your previous posts, you and others are not genuinely interested in an answer to the question. Instead, you are waiting for some to take the bait so you can brand them "tea baggers", "neocon Bush lovers", "inbred Southern gun-toting hicks", etc.

The reason why many people think this way has been explained a million times over in just about every P&N thread. You're just looking to stir the pot.

LOL... And stir he did! :awe:
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Under our plan, the missiles would have been targeted at Baghdad. The goal being to complete level and destroy all property within the City limits.

The tragedy of war is the necessity to kill good and the heathens. Are you saying no innocent people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were any innocent people saved as a result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Which Nation's innocents were saved?

Think about it.

Hey idiot. Iraq wasn't behind 9/11. You think about it.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Under our plan, the missiles would have been targeted at Baghdad. The goal being to complete level and destroy all property within the City limits.

The tragedy of war is the necessity to kill good and the heathens. Are you saying no innocent people were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Were any innocent people saved as a result of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Which Nation's innocents were saved?

Think about it.

First, Baghdad had NOTHING to do with 9/11. That's been proven.

Second, You didn't answer my question. Would Jesus have killed innocent people with a ball of fire from heaven shortly after 9/11 as you propose the USA should have done? If you purport youself to be a christian, isn't the whole point to live your live in the manner that Jesus did? I don't recall Jesus going to war with anyone.

Do you think Jesus cares about nations? Why would it matter which nations' innocents were killed in WW2, if all people are god's children?
 
Last edited:

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
religious loon alert!


Religiousloon.png
 

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
Second, You didn't answer my question. Would Jesus have killed innocent people with a ball of fire from heaven shortly after 9/11 as you propose the USA should have done? If you purport youself to be a christian, isn't the whole point to live your live in the manner that Jesus did? I don't recall Jesus going to war with anyone.

Do you think Jesus cares about nations? Why would it matter which nations' innocents were killed in WW2, if all people are god's children?

You brought Jesus into this, not me.

That said, I'll answer you.

God has demanded that we turn the other cheek. Why is that?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
You brought Jesus into this, not me.

That said, I'll answer you.

God has demanded that we turn the other cheek. Why is that?

Nice attempt to dodge my question.

Answer me directly. Don't answer my question with a question.

1. Would Jesus have killed innocent people with a ball of fire from heaven shortly after 9/11 as you propose the USA should have done?
2. If you purport youself to be a christian, isn't the whole point to live your live in the manner that Jesus did?

3. Do you think Jesus cares about / makes a distinction between nations?
4. Why would it matter which nations' innocents were killed in WW2, if all people are god's children?
 
Last edited:

Avvocato Effetti

Senior member
Nov 27, 2009
408
0
0
1. Would Jesus have killed innocent people with a ball of fire from heaven shortly after 9/11 as you propose the USA should have done?

How do I know Jesus would approve of this solution? Because that's what I would do if it were my decision.


2. If you purport youself to be a christian, isn't the whole point to live your live in the manner that Jesus did?

I can't answer that because I have agreed not to proselytize. PM me if you want a direct, uncensored, answer.

3. Do you think Jesus cares about / makes a distinction
between nations?

Yes. God calls them Sheep Nations and Goat Nations.

4. Why would it matter which nations' innocents were killed in WW2, if all people are god's children?

Yes. Re-read above.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Here is the first good example as to why innocent US Soldiers have to die instead of innocent Iraqis'.




And here in the second example.

Hey idiot. Iraq wasn't behind 9/11. We didn't need to shoot a nuke or invade. Get it through your thick head. Go pray for a brain FFS.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
Would you stand up in a room full of Gold Star Mothers and say that?

We have the power to destroy our enemies with the push of a button, why not use it.

Yes, I certainly would. Their sons made their choices. They died for their choices. Tragic.

They were NOT, however, innocent. Not by any stretch of the term.

----

The reason we don't use the one-button-solution because it kills 20x as many innocent civilians as it kills bad guys. Not to mention the international tension and backlash that would follow.

And even that situation (international tension and backlash) is mild in comparison to the scenario where: Russia sees ICBM's flying and assumes we're attacking them with our ICBM's, causing them to launch a full pre-emptive counterstrike on the USA.
 
Last edited: