Originally posted by: BannedTroll
Originally posted by: dohyun
Originally posted by: BannedTroll
99% of music has always been bad.
I can assume that either
a: You don't like music
b: You have bad taste in music.
c: Your bored and your posting whatever comes to your mind.
d: all of the above
Sorry, I'm just being honest. These kinds of threads are lame because in reality there is so much good music out there, both old and new.
You're not being honest. You are being an idiot. The percentage is about right. For every one song that is good/ original there are 99 that suck. It has always been that way.
Amused said it best:
"Originally posted by: Amused
99% of new music has ALWAYS sucked. Even when I was a kid (25-30 odd years ago)"
The problem is the sucky stuff is quickly forgotten and everyone pines away for the good old days.
Originally posted by: Taejin
no one's mentioned euro-trance/techno, and asian music is really nice too - Utada Hikaru, Do As Infinity, The Indigo, some earlier songs from BoA, Shinhwa, etc. I kind of like the chinese pop girl-group S.H.E. heh.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: Taejin
no one's mentioned euro-trance/techno, and asian music is really nice too - Utada Hikaru, Do As Infinity, The Indigo, some earlier songs from BoA, Shinhwa, etc. I kind of like the chinese pop girl-group S.H.E. heh.
Lol, the only thing worse than American pop music is asian pop music.
And to the guy above babbling about the 9 out of 10, you said 99% bs please off yourself. Now. I would assume that the op is not being literal when he says 99%, and if you can't figure that out (or are just extremely anal and like to start sh!t) you might have some problems.
Originally posted by: BannedTroll
Ummmm...was the "from any individual standpoint" too much for you to understand? Why do you think people bitch about buying whole albums? Cause most of the songs are filler and suck.
I even gave my definition of "sucks" in this context. Are you saying no music sucks because someone somwhere enjoys it?
2) Now we are getting a little deeper, thinking about what is the meaning of music and what makes it great. Is music supposed to be catchy and liked by everyone (A sides) or it is simply supposed to exist (B sides). Can we say that music sucks even though there is someone out there that likes it? I tend to think so, but before labeling crap music, perhaps we should try and define what is good music first.
Originally posted by: dohyun
Originally posted by: BannedTroll
Originally posted by: dohyun
Originally posted by: BannedTroll
99% of music has always been bad.
I can assume that either
a: You don't like music
b: You have bad taste in music.
c: Your bored and your posting whatever comes to your mind.
d: all of the above
Sorry, I'm just being honest. These kinds of threads are lame because in reality there is so much good music out there, both old and new.
You're not being honest. You are being an idiot. The percentage is about right. For every one song that is good/ original there are 99 that suck. It has always been that way.
Amused said it best:
"Originally posted by: Amused
99% of new music has ALWAYS sucked. Even when I was a kid (25-30 odd years ago)"
The problem is the sucky stuff is quickly forgotten and everyone pines away for the good old days.
Yea thanks for calling me an idiot. And thanks for coming up with percentages that don't make sense. Where is the proof that about 99 percent of music sucks? How would you know that 99 out of every 100 songs suck? How much music have you listen to? All I'm saying is that there are no numbers, no scientific evidence to back that up. And a lot of it is based on personal preference too.
I never said you were an idiot. Your not an idiot if you don't like music. Your not an idiot if you have bad taste in music. You are an idiot if you think that '99 percent of all music sucks'
Originally posted by: dohyun
See, these kinda questions could be really good topics. Instead we have topics about how today's music sucks, and then we have a billion people(hehe) agree with the OP, and life goes on with another pointless thread.
fiery furnaces - blueberry boat Here is an album that is a great example of new music that is good.
I like music that takes awhile to get used to. Music that you have to listen to and listen to until you get it. To me, that always seems to be guaranteed good music. The catchy music out there, which is normally more commercial, is not bad music in my opinion. Its good music, and had I not been exposed to other music, I'd be listening to it, and there would be nothing wrong with that. But the music I search for is what I consider better music. For example, its like comparing Silver to Gold. Silver is really good, but Gold is even better. Had I thought that only silver existed, I would have been content with it. But having found Gold, I can see that there are things even better than silver.
I don't know, I listen to alllllllot of music, and for someone to say that music, new or old, sucks bothers me. These people are getting sick and tired of silver, when in fact there is gold out there. I know my anology is not that great, but thats my 2 cents.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: dohyun
See, these kinda questions could be really good topics. Instead we have topics about how today's music sucks, and then we have a billion people(hehe) agree with the OP, and life goes on with another pointless thread.
fiery furnaces - blueberry boat Here is an album that is a great example of new music that is good.
I like music that takes awhile to get used to. Music that you have to listen to and listen to until you get it. To me, that always seems to be guaranteed good music. The catchy music out there, which is normally more commercial, is not bad music in my opinion. Its good music, and had I not been exposed to other music, I'd be listening to it, and there would be nothing wrong with that. But the music I search for is what I consider better music. For example, its like comparing Silver to Gold. Silver is really good, but Gold is even better. Had I thought that only silver existed, I would have been content with it. But having found Gold, I can see that there are things even better than silver.
I don't know, I listen to alllllllot of music, and for someone to say that music, new or old, sucks bothers me. These people are getting sick and tired of silver, when in fact there is gold out there. I know my anology is not that great, but thats my 2 cents.
Good deal. Art and these forums don't really mesh well, and threads have been made trying to dive a little deeper into music and all that turns up is 99% of the people on here couldn't really care less.
And yeah I do get tired of people bitching about music these days, always trying to compare everything to "the good ol days". I've said it on here countless times before, music is more experimental and creative now than it has ever been. There are countless musicians out there doing some really, really great things. Most of you unfortunately have the attitude that if it is good then it must be popular so I would have heard it already. It just doesn't seem to work that way. You have to actually do a little research of your own, but once you find the good stuff it is all worth it.
Go out and listen to some local bands, not these big name acts with the fancy shows etc. I'm talking about the broke band that no one has ever heard of that puts on the most kick ass show you have ever seen. No lasers, no smoke, stupid fvcking masks, or any of that other stuff that just seems to try and make up for what these big bands lack in actual creative talent.
