• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How does everyone choose what digital camera they are gonna buy?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I'm gonna have to side with Ornery. I LOVE my DSC-F717 and the image quality is top notch. And the low-light shooting opportunities afforded by Night-Framing and Night-Shot are unmatcheable.

As for MS, I used to be on the bash MS bandwagon, but I picked up my 512MB MS Pro for $70 shipped a month and a half ago. I got another 512MB MS Stick Pro on black Friday for $34 with no rebates from Circuit City (I also bought 8 more and hawked them on eBay for $40 profit a piece, but that's another story😛).

In fact, I love Sony's image quality and ease of use so much that I'm going to upgrade to a DSC-V3 as soon as I can find a hot deal on one

 
Also Ornery, pretty much the only con from steves digicams was the gripability of the camer with the flash up, whats your take on this? And do any B&M stores still carry this camera. I do think my local sears has it, but doesn't look like any place else does. I will likely buy online since I get disocunts at a few places online, but want to feel the camera in my hands first.
 
Originally posted by: Ornery
I'm going to upgrade to a DSC-V3...

You are a sick SOB, Brandon! 😛

Hell, I made a cool $320 just selling those 8 Memory Sticks on eBay 😛 I sell my DSC-F717 and I'm home free 😛
 
Originally posted by: coolred
Also Ornery, pretty much the only con from steves digicams was the gripability of the camer with the flash up, whats your take on this? And do any B&M stores still carry this camera. I do think my local sears has it, but doesn't look like any place else does. I will likely buy online since I get disocunts at a few places online, but want to feel the camera in my hands first.
The bitch of it is, if you're holding the camera where the flash pops up, it won't be able to pop up, and you'll have to move your finger. You'll do that twice, and that will be the end of it. You won't put your finger in the way anymore.

Good lord, buy it from your local Sears. You may even want to take them up on their "Protection Agreement". It's 20% of the cost, which is steep, but if it breaks for ANY reason, they replace it. Drop it down the stairs, and they'll give you a new one. Step on it the very next week, and they give you another... over and over you can replace it. When the warranty period is about to expire, and you happen to break it, they replace it with the current model if that one is discontinued, which it will be. That will likely be the V3 that Brandon is drooling over. All yours for coughing up about $60.00 more today at your local Sears.

Edit: Man, I gotta get my Ebay shlt together! :Q
 
Yeah the low light thing is really catching my attention, since when I bought my camcorder I bought one that had some issues with low light situations. I figured it wouldn't matter since I would most likely be using it in well lit rooms. Well man that thing really sucks unless there are like 5 100 watt bulbs in the room going. I am sure the canon digicams and others aren't like that. But I am alos recalling the birthday party I was just at, and how they turn th elights off when they light the candles, so again the sony feature would be nice.

Tami, I am not saying that I need 5MP(it would be nice though)but I would assume the 5MP canon would be a bit more expensive then the sony. Again though I was not complaining about the canon you suggested. But look at it this way. Lets say you were looking to buy a car and I told you to buy a tiny compact, but you also knew you could get a slightly larger midsized that maybe had more power and better gas mileage for the same price. Sure if size is the only factor then you would want the compact, but if the other factors are factors then you may consider the other car. I just wanted to know what I got fromt he canon since it was the same price yet less advanced statistically then the sony. Apparently size is the only benefit. And again size is nice, but not my main factor in buying a camera.

My girlfriend does not require the smallest camera available. Compared to her current 35mm camera the sony is barely bigger in any dimension except depth where I admit it is about an inch deeper. I will ask her and definately take her with me when I check out the cameras, but I am almost 99% sure that she would accept something the size of the sony. But I will get her opinion before buying. But if I tell her she can have a small camera or one that works really good in low light, i think she will opt for th elow light
 
You can't compare a camcorder to a digital camera. The low light problem is a matter of being able to focus with the digital camera. With the camcorder, it's a matter of grainyness.

Most digital cameras have some kind of focus assist light to help out. Once the camera can focus, it WILL take a good picture, unless you don't use the flash. Trouble is getting it to lock that focus in the first place. The Hologram Autofocus Assist NEVER fails, and it works quickly without having to zoom wider, turn up lights, or find some "contrasty" portion of your subject.
 
Originally posted by: aceO07
Originally posted by: NFS4
I just made these two shots in pitch-black darkness with Night-Framing and Night-Shot:

NIGHT_SHOT.jpg
NIGHT_FRAMING.jpg

I assume that Night Shot is using some sort of camera light (AF assist?).

What is Night Framing? Long exposure or flash?

As if this cool laser pattern weren't enough, Sony has once again included the NightFraming/NightShot mode in the Cyber-shot DSC-V3. Rather than permanently filter it out as other camera manufacturers do both of these features take advantage of the tendency of digital cameras to pick up infrared light. For normal photographs you want to filter this light out, because it distorts color rendition, but Sony got clever and mounted their IR filter on a moveable frame. Press the NightFraming/NightShot button and you'll hear a loud click. That's the IR filter moving out of the way. NightFraming is a useful tool, making the V3 more capable than even film cameras, because with this camera you can literally see in the dark, yet still capture a full color image. First the camera shows you a green monochrome image with an eerie glow at the center. This is from the infrared beam the camera is projecting (it appears as a dim red glow from the front of the camera). With this assistance, you can frame your shot fairly well. It really only illuminates the center of the frame with the camera at wide angle, but it's enough to see what's where before you take your shot. Then you press the shutter and the camera goes back to color mode, indicated with a click as the IR filter moves back into place. Now a laser pattern is projected to focus. Once focus is achieved, the IR sensor moves back out of place so you can continue to frame your shot with IR assistance. Finally, you press the shutter and the IR filter moves back into place, the shutter is tripped, and the flash fires, yielding a full-color shot with no IR signal to degrade performance. All this sounds like a lot of trouble, but the camera handles it automatically. It can be surprisingly useful in common low light situations like amusement parks or indoors at night.

Not quite as useful but still a lot of fun on the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-V3 is the Night Shot mode. You won't hear any clicking in this mode except when you turn it on and off. Here, the IR filter moves out of the way during both viewing and capture. The resulting images are green monochrome (in some of my test shots, red does tend to show through a bit). This mode's usefulness is clear, for taking pictures in darkness or near darkness without disturbing the subject with focus assist beams or flashes. As I mentioned, the IR beam does glow a faint red, so anyone conscious of your presence will catch you--or else freak out and think you're giving them a truly evil eye--but it would be perfect for catching a sleeping child. NightShot mode can also be used for video, so you can also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that your spouse snores, for example. We're told this mode does not actually see through clothing, as has sometimes been reported, so no one need worry that you're ogling them electronically.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/V3/V3A.HTM
 
Buy it from sears you say, I suppose I can do that, its only a few bucks more expensive there. Although at cructhfield I get a 50gift card with it that I could use to buy a bigger memory stick. Will have to check into that service plan thing though, that sounds good. especially considering how many times I have seen her drop her cell phone. ALthough never seen her drop the camera. I see the 60 dollar plan only covers it for a year. SO if i happened to break it in that time frame, wouldn't it still be covered by the 1 year warranty on it?


Nice shots NFS4
 
My girlfriend got me an Olympus D-580 for Christmas. We celebrated early. 🙂

gbasp

So far, I think it's a great camera. Fits my needs perfectly as I didn't need anything really uber. Simple to use and takes pretty great pictures.

And someday when it finishes uploading (on dialup 🙁): yawn
 
Here are two of the first pics I ever took with my Canon EOS-20D DSLR. Mind you, these are also some of the first pics I've taken with a SLR/DSLR period!

(I bought the EOS-20D with 17-85mm IS lens Kit from B&H for $1999.99.)

ISO 800
Shutter 1/6 sec (IS on!)
Aperature Value 7.6
F-Stop 14
Focal length 38mm

Test Shot 1
(Size reduction of original. No other alterations.)
Test Shot 1 Crop
(Crop of original. No other alterations.)

ISO 200
Shutter 1/13 sec (IS on!)
Aperature Value 5.0
F-Stop 5.6
Focal length 75mm

Test Shot 2
(Size reduction of original. No other alterations.)
Test Shot 2 Crop
(Crop of original. No other alterations.)


(Special thanks to DeviousTrap for making this picture hosting possible!)
 
Originally posted by: coolred
Originally posted by: EmperorIQ
for the record, i hate it when people say, "oh that camera is 5MP it must be good"

Who said that?

no one did, but just adding that in, sorry if i insulted anyone.

and for the record again, i posted that comment before i read that you'd prefer 5mp, i wasn't refering to you, just some friends that i have who seem to always think bigger is better
 
read reviews and compare the sample pictures taken by reviewers. Goto store, get a feel for the camera, build etc. Go online and find a good deal. Checkout, Tada!
 
Originally posted by: Ornery
You can't compare a camcorder to a digital camera. The low light problem is a matter of being able to focus with the digital camera. With the camcorder, it's a matter of grainyness.

Most digital cameras have some kind of focus assist light to help out. Once the camera can focus, it WILL take a good picture, unless you don't use the flash. Trouble is getting it to lock that focus in the first place. The Hologram Autofocus Assist NEVER fails, and it works quickly without having to zoom wider, turn up lights, or find some "contrasty" portion of your subject.

That is complete BS. There are many situations in which a P&S digital or film camera will take crappy pictures with the flash. You clearly don't know WTF you are talking about.
 
Originally posted by: EmperorIQ
Originally posted by: coolred
Originally posted by: EmperorIQ
for the record, i hate it when people say, "oh that camera is 5MP it must be good"

Who said that?

no one did, but just adding that in, sorry if i insulted anyone.

and for the record again, i posted that comment before i read that you'd prefer 5mp, i wasn't refering to you, just some friends that i have who seem to always think bigger is better



I wasn't really sayign I would prefer a 5MP camera, and I do suppose I could be one of the people you speak of. I know that a7MP camera with crappy lens and CCD is gonna look worse then a 3MP camera with good optics and everything. But since we are pretty much talking about good cameras here, it would seem to me that more MP would be better.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Ornery
You can't compare a camcorder to a digital camera. The low light problem is a matter of being able to focus with the digital camera. With the camcorder, it's a matter of grainyness.

Most digital cameras have some kind of focus assist light to help out. Once the camera can focus, it WILL take a good picture, unless you don't use the flash. Trouble is getting it to lock that focus in the first place. The Hologram Autofocus Assist NEVER fails, and it works quickly without having to zoom wider, turn up lights, or find some "contrasty" portion of your subject.

That is complete BS. There are many situations in which a P&S digital or film camera will take crappy pictures with the flash. You clearly don't know WTF you are talking about.

Can you elaborate further? I feel you may be right, but at least Ornery is attempting to post useful info. It seems like most everyone else just chimes in with generic this is better comments. He at least says this is better for this and this reason. While I have no reason to doubt what he says, I also have no facts myself to back up what he says. But its still better then "mine is just better"

On another note, thats a cute kid you got there, how old is he?
 
The Nytimes just did a review on digital cams, and particularly small ones under the $300 dollar range....check it out...www.nytimes.com in case you didn't know the website. They as well as I, will recommend Canon. Not to flame the fire, but Canon's take fantastic pictures, nough said!
 
Originally posted by: waldo
The Nytimes just did a review on digital cams, and particularly small ones under the $300 dollar range....check it out...www.nytimes.com in case you didn't know the website. They as well as I, will recommend Canon. Not to flame the fire, but Canon's take fantastic pictures, nough said!

Going to the NY Times for camera reviews is like going to Motor Trend to see what power tools are best.
 
Back
Top